Bank of America Corporation
Bank of America Corporation BAC-PP Peers
See (BAC-PP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAC-PP | $16.98 | +0.00% | 129.4B | 4.89 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| JPM | $289.91 | +0.00% | 807.2B | 14.25 | $20.38 | +1.74% |
| JPM-PD | $24.57 | +0.00% | 797.1B | 1.84 | $13.48 | +1.74% |
| JPM-PC | $25.21 | +0.00% | 785.4B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.74% |
| BAC-PL | $1,213.00 | +0.00% | 454.4B | 343.40 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BAC | $47.32 | +0.00% | 362.8B | 14.38 | $3.35 | +2.16% |
| BML-PG | $20.69 | +0.02% | 360.4B | 5.90 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PH | $20.01 | +0.00% | 357.5B | 5.74 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PL | $20.22 | +0.00% | 357.5B | 5.81 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PJ | $21.65 | +0.00% | 356.3B | 6.20 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
Stock Comparison
BAC-PP vs JPM Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 807.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM trades at $289.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs JPM-PD Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 797.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM-PD trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs JPM-PC Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 785.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM-PC trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PL Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 454.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PL trades at $1,213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 343.40. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 362.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BML-PG Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 360.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BML-PG trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BML-PH Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BML-PH trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BML-PL Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BML-PL trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BML-PJ Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 356.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BML-PJ trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PB Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 348.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PB trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PK Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 344.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PK trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PE Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 343.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PE trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 265.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC trades at $80.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PC Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 258.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PC trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 61.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PL Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 257.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PL trades at $1,174.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 243.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs HSBC Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while HSBC trades at $60.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PQ Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PY Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PY trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs RY Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 186.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while RY trades at $131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PR Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PM Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PM trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs C Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while C trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas C's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs MUFG Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while MUFG trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PN Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PN trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PS Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PS trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PO Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PO trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BAC-PQ Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs TD Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while TD trades at $73.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs SAN Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while SAN trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs C-PJ Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs UBS Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while UBS trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs RY-PT Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs SMFG Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while SMFG trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BBVA Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BBVA trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BMO Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BMO trades at $110.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BNS Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BNS trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs ING Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while ING trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs CM Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while CM trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs NU Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while NU trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs BCS Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while BCS trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PZ Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PA Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PA trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs JPM-PJ Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WFC-PD Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WFC-PD trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs JPM-PL Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM-PL trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs JPM-PK Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM-PK trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs JPM-PM Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while JPM-PM trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs C-PK Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs NWG Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while NWG trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs EWBC Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while EWBC trades at $100.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs CS Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs NTB Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while NTB trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs TANNL Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs FRC-PL Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.
BAC-PP vs WBK Comparison
BAC-PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PP stands at 129.4B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PP is priced at $16.98, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.89, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PP's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PP is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PP.