Bank of America Corporation
Bank of America Corporation (BAC-PN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAC-PN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAC-PN | $20.27 | -0.15% | 152.7B | 5.77 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| JPM-PC | $25.43 | +0.00% | 830.5B | 1.89 | $13.48 | +1.78% |
| JPM | $298.28 | -0.11% | 828.9B | 15.30 | $19.50 | +1.78% |
| JPM-PD | $24.93 | -0.32% | 827.2B | 1.85 | $13.48 | +1.78% |
| BAC-PL | $1,220.00 | +0.08% | 459.4B | 347.18 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BAC-PE | $21.45 | +0.57% | 367B | 6.10 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BML-PH | $20.50 | +0.27% | 365.9B | 5.83 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BML-PL | $20.76 | +0.10% | 365.4B | 5.91 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BML-PG | $20.65 | +0.15% | 365B | 5.87 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BAC-PB | $25.24 | +0.12% | 364.6B | 7.17 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
BAC-PN vs JPM-PC Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 830.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM-PC trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM-PC's competition here
BAC-PN vs JPM Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 828.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM trades at $298.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM's competition here
BAC-PN vs JPM-PD Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 827.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM-PD trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM-PD's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PL Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 459.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PL trades at $1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 347.18. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PL's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PE Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 367B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PE trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PE's competition here
BAC-PN vs BML-PH Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 365.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BML-PH trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BML-PH's competition here
BAC-PN vs BML-PL Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 365.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BML-PL trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BML-PL's competition here
BAC-PN vs BML-PG Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 365B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BML-PG trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BML-PG's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PB Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PB trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN and BAC-PB have similar daily volatility (0.44).Check BAC-PB's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PK Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 364.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PK trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PK's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 363.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC trades at $48.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC's competition here
BAC-PN vs BML-PJ Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 361B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BML-PJ trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BML-PJ's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PL Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 273.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PL trades at $1,186.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 245.64. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PL's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PC Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 273.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PC trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.72. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PC's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 270.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC trades at $83.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC's competition here
BAC-PN vs HSBC Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 225.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while HSBC trades at $64.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check HSBC's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PQ Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PY Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 191.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PY trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PY's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PR Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PR's competition here
BAC-PN vs RY Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 184B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while RY trades at $130.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check RY's competition here
BAC-PN vs C Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while C trades at $95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas C's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check C's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PM Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 163.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PM trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PM's competition here
BAC-PN vs MUFG Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 162.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while MUFG trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check MUFG's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PS Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PS trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PS's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PO Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PO trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PO's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PQ Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
BAC-PN vs SAN Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while SAN trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check SAN's competition here
BAC-PN vs TD Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while TD trades at $74.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check TD's competition here
BAC-PN vs BAC-PP Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BAC-PP trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BAC-PP's competition here
BAC-PN vs C-PJ Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN and C-PJ have similar daily volatility (0.44).Check C-PJ's competition here
BAC-PN vs UBS Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while UBS trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check UBS's competition here
BAC-PN vs RY-PT Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check RY-PT's competition here
BAC-PN vs BBVA Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BBVA trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BBVA's competition here
BAC-PN vs BMO Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BMO trades at $113.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BMO's competition here
BAC-PN vs BNS Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BNS trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BNS's competition here
BAC-PN vs ING Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while ING trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check ING's competition here
BAC-PN vs CM Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while CM trades at $73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check CM's competition here
BAC-PN vs BCS Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while BCS trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check BCS's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PZ Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PA Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PA trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PA's competition here
BAC-PN vs SMFG Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while SMFG trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check SMFG's competition here
BAC-PN vs NU Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while NU trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check NU's competition here
BAC-PN vs NWG Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while NWG trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check NWG's competition here
BAC-PN vs WFC-PD Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WFC-PD trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WFC-PD's competition here
BAC-PN vs JPM-PJ Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
BAC-PN vs JPM-PL Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM-PL trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM-PL's competition here
BAC-PN vs JPM-PK Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM-PK trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM-PK's competition here
BAC-PN vs JPM-PM Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while JPM-PM trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check JPM-PM's competition here
BAC-PN vs C-PK Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check C-PK's competition here
BAC-PN vs EWBC Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while EWBC trades at $103.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check EWBC's competition here
BAC-PN vs CS Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check CS's competition here
BAC-PN vs NTB Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while NTB trades at $44.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check NTB's competition here
BAC-PN vs TANNL Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check TANNL's competition here
BAC-PN vs FRC-PL Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check FRC-PL's competition here
BAC-PN vs WBK Comparison July 2025
BAC-PN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PN stands at 152.7B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PN is priced at $20.27, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PN's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PN is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PN.Check WBK's competition here