Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure plc
Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure plc (AY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AY | $21.99 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 87.96 | $0.25 | N/A |
| GEV | $822.38 | -1.47% | 225.3B | 47.02 | $17.66 | +0.15% |
| CEG | $296.25 | +1.57% | 92.1B | 33.77 | $8.73 | +0.53% |
| AXIA | $11.78 | +0.46% | 26.7B | -22.03 | -$0.54 | +10.63% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +3.93% |
| BEP | $32.23 | +2.41% | 9.7B | -127.36 | -$0.25 | +4.68% |
| ENLT | $71.41 | +3.79% | 9.3B | 77.83 | $0.90 | N/A |
| CWEN | $39.67 | +1.30% | 8.1B | 16.86 | $2.35 | +4.47% |
| CWEN-A | $37.06 | +0.79% | 7.8B | 15.74 | $2.35 | +4.47% |
| ORA | $114.90 | -4.29% | 7B | 53.66 | $2.16 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
AY vs GEV Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 225.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while GEV trades at $822.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 47.02. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check GEV's competition here
AY vs CEG Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while CEG trades at $296.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check CEG's competition here
AY vs AXIA Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AXIA has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while AXIA trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas AXIA's P/E ratio is -22.03. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AXIA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to AXIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check AXIA's competition here
AY vs AQNU Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check AQNU's competition here
AY vs BEP Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while BEP trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -127.36. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check BEP's competition here
AY vs ENLT Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ENLT trades at $71.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 77.83. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ENLT's competition here
AY vs CWEN Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while CWEN trades at $39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check CWEN's competition here
AY vs CWEN-A Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while CWEN-A trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check CWEN-A's competition here
AY vs ORA Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ORA trades at $114.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 53.66. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ORA's competition here
AY vs BEP-PA Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while BEP-PA trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -35.66. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check BEP-PA's competition here
AY vs BEPC Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while BEPC trades at $43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -10.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check BEPC's competition here
AY vs AQN Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while AQN trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check AQN's competition here
AY vs EE Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while EE trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check EE's competition here
AY vs SMR Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while SMR trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check SMR's competition here
AY vs SMR-WT Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check SMR-WT's competition here
AY vs FLNC Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while FLNC trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -42.44. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check FLNC's competition here
AY vs RNW Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while RNW trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check RNW's competition here
AY vs NEP Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check NEP's competition here
AY vs AMPS Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMPS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check AMPS's competition here
AY vs NRGV Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while NRGV trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check NRGV's competition here
AY vs ELLO Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 352.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ELLO trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is -365.71. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is more volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ELLO's competition here
AY vs AZRE Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check AZRE's competition here
AY vs NXXT Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while NXXT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check NXXT's competition here
AY vs VGAS Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while VGAS trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check VGAS's competition here
AY vs SUUN Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while SUUN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check SUUN's competition here
AY vs WAVE Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while WAVE trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check WAVE's competition here
AY vs CREG Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while CREG trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check CREG's competition here
AY vs RAIN Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while RAIN trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAIN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check RAIN's competition here
AY vs HLGN-WT Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of +400.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check HLGN-WT's competition here
AY vs HLGN Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while HLGN trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLGN's ROE of +400.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check HLGN's competition here
AY vs HTOO Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while HTOO trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check HTOO's competition here
AY vs RNWWW Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while RNWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is more volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check RNWWW's competition here
AY vs ADN Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ADN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ADN's competition here
AY vs ELIQ Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ELIQ's competition here
AY vs BNRG Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 525.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while BNRG trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check BNRG's competition here
AY vs HTOOW Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while HTOOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check HTOOW's competition here
AY vs ALCE Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 600. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ALCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALCE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is more volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ALCE's competition here
AY vs ADNWW Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 544. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while ADNWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check ADNWW's competition here
AY vs JNS Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, JNS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while JNS trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas JNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to JNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check JNS's competition here
AY vs LFG Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AY is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check LFG's competition here
AY vs GXP Comparison February 2026
AY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AY is priced at $21.99, while GXP trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AY currently has a P/E ratio of 87.96, whereas GXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GXP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AY is less volatile compared to GXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AY.Check GXP's competition here