Applied UV, Inc.
Applied UV, Inc. AUVIP Peers
See (AUVIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUVIP | $0.78 | +21.34% | 1.4M | -0.90 | -$0.87 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.62% |
| SN | $87.13 | +6.09% | 12.2B | 27.57 | $3.16 | N/A |
| MHK | $103.09 | +1.64% | 6.4B | 13.48 | $7.65 | N/A |
| WHR | $93.05 | +3.11% | 5.2B | 715.77 | $0.13 | +7.58% |
| PATK | $90.10 | +0.20% | 3B | 21.66 | $4.16 | +2.16% |
| LZB | $38.90 | +1.63% | 1.6B | 13.37 | $2.91 | +2.21% |
| MBC | $10.21 | +1.39% | 1.3B | 13.26 | $0.77 | N/A |
| LEG | $9.43 | +2.06% | 1.3B | -2.52 | -$3.74 | +2.13% |
| TILE | $20.39 | +1.65% | 1.2B | 13.97 | $1.46 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
AUVIP vs TPX Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs SN Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while SN trades at $87.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs MHK Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while MHK trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs WHR Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while WHR trades at $93.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 715.77. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs PATK Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while PATK trades at $90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs LZB Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while LZB trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs MBC Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while MBC trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs LEG Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while LEG trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs TILE Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while TILE trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs MLKN Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while MLKN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs AMWD Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 769.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while AMWD trades at $51.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs ETD Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 692.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while ETD trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs COOK Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 275.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while COOK trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs LOVE Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while LOVE trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs HBB Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 233M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while HBB trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs FLXS Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while FLXS trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs SNBR Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while SNBR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs BSET Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while BSET trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BSET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs VIRC Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while VIRC trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs HOFT Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while HOFT trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs KEQU Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while KEQU trades at $37.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs IRBT Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while IRBT trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs VIOT Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while VIOT trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VIOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs LCUT Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while LCUT trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs PRPL Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while PRPL trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs NTZ Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while NTZ trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs CRWS Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while CRWS trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs NVFY Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while NVFY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs NCL Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while NCL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NCL's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs ATER Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while ATER trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs EFOI Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while EFOI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs FGI Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while FGI trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs AUVI Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs FGIWW Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 423K. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs KBAL Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.
AUVIP vs WEBR Comparison
AUVIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUVIP stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AUVIP is priced at $0.78, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUVIP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUVIP's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AUVIP is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUVIP.