Ardmore Shipping Corporation
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASC | $15.75 | +3.48% | 642.2M | 17.89 | $0.88 | +1.97% |
| KEX | $135.92 | +0.82% | 7.3B | 21.45 | $6.34 | N/A |
| MATX | $166.39 | +0.90% | 5.2B | 12.04 | $13.82 | +0.85% |
| HAFN | $7.91 | +3.53% | 4B | 11.81 | $0.67 | +6.87% |
| ZIM | $26.30 | +1.35% | 3.2B | 6.61 | $3.98 | +7.62% |
| CMRE-PC | $26.75 | +1.33% | 3B | 7.20 | $3.72 | +2.65% |
| CMBT | $12.90 | +2.95% | 3B | 18.43 | $0.70 | +0.54% |
| SBLK | $24.32 | +2.83% | 2.8B | 33.32 | $0.73 | +2.40% |
| SB-PD | $26.58 | +0.30% | 2.7B | 17.63 | $1.51 | +3.04% |
| SB-PC | $26.00 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 17.24 | $1.51 | +3.04% |
Stock Comparison
ASC vs KEX Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while KEX trades at $135.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check KEX's competition here
ASC vs MATX Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while MATX trades at $166.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check MATX's competition here
ASC vs HAFN Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while HAFN trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check HAFN's competition here
ASC vs ZIM Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while ZIM trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check ZIM's competition here
ASC vs CMRE-PC Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
ASC vs CMBT Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMBT trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMBT's competition here
ASC vs SBLK Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SBLK trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SBLK's competition here
ASC vs SB-PD Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SB-PD trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SB-PD's competition here
ASC vs SB-PC Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SB-PC trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SB-PC's competition here
ASC vs BWLP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while BWLP trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check BWLP's competition here
ASC vs DAC Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while DAC trades at $115.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check DAC's competition here
ASC vs CDLR Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CDLR trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CDLR's competition here
ASC vs CMRE Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMRE trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMRE's competition here
ASC vs NMM Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NMM trades at $69.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NMM's competition here
ASC vs ECO Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while ECO trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check ECO's competition here
ASC vs GOGL Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GOGL's competition here
ASC vs SFL Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SFL trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is -54.60. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SFL's competition here
ASC vs CMRE-PD Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMRE-PD trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
ASC vs GSL Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GSL trades at $38.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GSL's competition here
ASC vs CMRE-PB Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
ASC vs NAT Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NAT trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 102.67. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NAT's competition here
ASC vs SBBA Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SBBA's competition here
ASC vs CCEC Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CCEC trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CCEC's competition here
ASC vs GNK Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GNK trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is -241.70. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GNK's competition here
ASC vs CMRE-PE Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
ASC vs CPLP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CPLP's competition here
ASC vs GSL-PB Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 956.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GSL-PB trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GSL-PB's competition here
ASC vs SB Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 675.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SB trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SB's competition here
ASC vs HSHP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 657.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while HSHP trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check HSHP's competition here
ASC vs CLCO Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CLCO's competition here
ASC vs PANL Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 476.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while PANL trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check PANL's competition here
ASC vs ESEA Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 471.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while ESEA trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check ESEA's competition here
ASC vs NETI Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NETI's competition here
ASC vs CMDB Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 423.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CMDB trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CMDB's competition here
ASC vs GASS Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 354.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GASS trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GASS's competition here
ASC vs KNOP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while KNOP trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check KNOP's competition here
ASC vs DSX Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while DSX trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check DSX's competition here
ASC vs SHIP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 295.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SHIP trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SHIP's competition here
ASC vs OP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while OP trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check OP's competition here
ASC vs SMHI Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SMHI trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SMHI's competition here
ASC vs ESEAV Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check ESEAV's competition here
ASC vs DSX-PB Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while DSX-PB trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check DSX-PB's competition here
ASC vs TORO Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while TORO trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check TORO's competition here
ASC vs HTCO Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while HTCO trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check HTCO's competition here
ASC vs EDRY Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while EDRY trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check EDRY's competition here
ASC vs NM Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NM's competition here
ASC vs NM-PH Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NM-PH's competition here
ASC vs GLBS Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GLBS trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -29.62. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GLBS's competition here
ASC vs HMR Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while HMR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMR's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check HMR's competition here
ASC vs PXSAP Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check PXSAP's competition here
ASC vs PXS Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while PXS trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check PXS's competition here
ASC vs EHLDV Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check EHLDV's competition here
ASC vs NM-PG Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NM-PG's competition here
ASC vs TOROV Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check TOROV's competition here
ASC vs UFG Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while UFG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 83.01. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check UFG's competition here
ASC vs VNTG Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while VNTG trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check VNTG's competition here
ASC vs CACO Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CACO's competition here
ASC vs PSHG Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while PSHG trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check PSHG's competition here
ASC vs EHLD Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while EHLD trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check EHLD's competition here
ASC vs USEA Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while USEA trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check USEA's competition here
ASC vs CTRM Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CTRM trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTRM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CTRM's competition here
ASC vs TOPS Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while TOPS trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check TOPS's competition here
ASC vs SVRN Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SVRN trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SVRN's competition here
ASC vs NCT Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while NCT trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check NCT's competition here
ASC vs CISS Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while CISS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check CISS's competition here
ASC vs ICON Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 425.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while ICON trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check ICON's competition here
ASC vs RUBI Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 270.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while RUBI trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check RUBI's competition here
ASC vs PXSAW Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check PXSAW's competition here
ASC vs SHIPW Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SHIPW's competition here
ASC vs GSLD Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GSLD's competition here
ASC vs RLOG Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check RLOG's competition here
ASC vs SBLKZ Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SBLKZ's competition here
ASC vs GNRT Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check GNRT's competition here
ASC vs SHIPZ Comparison April 2026
ASC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASC stands at 642.2M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASC is priced at $15.75, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.89, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ASC's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASC is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASC.Check SHIPZ's competition here