Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. ARE Peers
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $70.53 | +1.41% | 12.2B | 92.80 | $0.76 | +7.42% |
| DLR | $176.79 | +0.50% | 59.5B | 165.22 | $1.07 | +2.75% |
| DLR-PK | $23.41 | -0.19% | 58.9B | 4.84 | $4.83 | +2.75% |
| DLR-PJ | $21.13 | -0.59% | 58.3B | 4.37 | $4.83 | +2.75% |
| BXP | $74.12 | +3.22% | 11.7B | -2470.67 | -$0.03 | +5.28% |
| VNO | $40.25 | +2.81% | 7.7B | 77.40 | $0.52 | +1.84% |
| VNO-PL | $17.77 | +0.11% | 7.5B | 27.59 | $0.64 | +1.84% |
| VNO-PM | $17.01 | -0.12% | 7.5B | 26.41 | $0.64 | +1.84% |
| DLR-PL | $20.32 | -0.49% | 6.8B | 4.20 | $4.83 | +2.75% |
| CUZ | $29.39 | +2.46% | 4.9B | 89.05 | $0.33 | +4.35% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs DLR Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DLR trades at $176.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 165.22. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DLR-PK Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DLR-PK trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DLR-PJ Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DLR-PJ trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs BXP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while BXP trades at $74.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is -2470.67. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while VNO trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 77.40. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while VNO-PL trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while VNO-PM trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DLR-PL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DLR-PL trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CUZ Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CUZ trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 89.05. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs SLG Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while SLG trades at $64.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -153.24. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while SLG-PI trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs KRC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while KRC trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs HIW Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while HIW trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while VNO-PN trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CDP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CDP trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while VNO-PO trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DEI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DEI trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OGCP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while OGCP trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs ESBA Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while ESBA trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs FISK Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while FISK trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CLI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while HPP-PC trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -100.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs WRE Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs ELME Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while ELME trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -101.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs PGRE Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while PGRE trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -20.94. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs JBGS Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while JBGS trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DEA Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DEA trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 54.59. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs PDM Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 947.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while PDM trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs BDN Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while BDN trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CIO-PA trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CXP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs NLOP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 466.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while NLOP trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs PSTL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while PSTL trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 50.68. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs HPP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while HPP trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CIO Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CIO trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs FSP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while FSP trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs EQC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs ONL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while ONL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs NYC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while NYC trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYC's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OPINL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while OPINL trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OPI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CMCT Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CMCT trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OFC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $70.53, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 92.80, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.