Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 56.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DLR trades at $166.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 158.68. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 55.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DLR-PJ trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 54.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DLR-PK trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while BXP trades at $64.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 719.89. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, NBFJF has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while NBFJF trades at $900.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NBFJF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NBFJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, GECFF has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while GECFF trades at $98.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas GECFF's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GECFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to GECFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while VNO-PL trades at $17.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while VNO-PM trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while VNO trades at $37.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 925.75. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DLR-PL trades at $20.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, JREIF has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while JREIF trades at $740.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas JREIF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JREIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to JREIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CUZ trades at $27.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 84.23. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, KPDCF has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while KPDCF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas KPDCF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPDCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to KPDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while SLG-PI trades at $21.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while SLG trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is 654.41. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, MRVGF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while MRVGF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas MRVGF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRVGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to MRVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while KRC trades at $31.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, IMQCF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while IMQCF trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas IMQCF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMQCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to IMQCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, ORXJF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while ORXJF trades at $1,245.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ORXJF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORXJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ORXJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while VNO-PN trades at $16.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while HIW trades at $29.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CDP trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while VNO-PO trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DWVYF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DWVYF trades at $22.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DWVYF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DWVYF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DWVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, KREVF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while KREVF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas KREVF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KREVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to KREVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DEI trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 108.81. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while OGCP trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while FISK trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while ESBA trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CLI trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while HPP-PC trades at $12.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -103.55. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, GPEAF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while GPEAF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas GPEAF's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPEAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to GPEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, APYRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while APYRF trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas APYRF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to APYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while WRE trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while ELME trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -105.97. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, WKPPF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while WKPPF trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas WKPPF's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WKPPF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to WKPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while JBGS trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 996.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while PGRE trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -14.66. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 944.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DEA trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 806.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while PDM trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 772.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CIO-PA trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 704.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while BDN trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CXP trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, ALSRF has a market cap of 678.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while ALSRF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ALSRF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALSRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ALSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 451.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while NLOP trades at $30.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, NIUWF has a market cap of 447.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while NIUWF trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NIUWF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NIUWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NIUWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 314.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while HPP trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 298.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while PSTL trades at $12.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 197.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CIO trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DRETF has a market cap of 178.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DRETF trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DRETF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRETF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while EQC trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 156.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while FSP trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 112.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while ONL trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, TUERF has a market cap of 77.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while TUERF trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TUERF's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TUERF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to TUERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 29.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while NYC trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, SLTTF has a market cap of 27.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while SLTTF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SLTTF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLTTF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, IVREF has a market cap of 22.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while IVREF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas IVREF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IVREF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to IVREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 22.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while OPINL trades at $8.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 22.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while OPI trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CMCT trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584442.00. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, PRLE has a market cap of 13142.00. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while PRLE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PRLE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRLE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PRLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, DTLA-P comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, CMCTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.72B. In comparison, OFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $73.51, while OFC trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OFC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.