Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $82.19 | +0.17% | 14.2B | -632.38 | -$0.13 | +6.38% |
| DLR-PJ | $21.19 | -0.28% | 61.1B | 4.40 | $4.83 | +2.74% |
| DLR-PK | $23.46 | -0.38% | 60.5B | 4.85 | $4.83 | +2.74% |
| DLR | $177.91 | -1.17% | 59.9B | 46.56 | $3.82 | +2.74% |
| BXP | $71.80 | +1.50% | 11.4B | -2393.33 | -$0.03 | +5.44% |
| VNO-PM | $17.35 | +0.41% | 7.8B | 26.96 | $0.64 | +1.85% |
| VNO-PL | $17.82 | +0.11% | 7.7B | 27.67 | $0.64 | +1.85% |
| VNO | $39.93 | +0.96% | 7.7B | 76.79 | $0.52 | +1.85% |
| DLR-PL | $20.68 | +0.32% | 7B | 4.28 | $4.83 | +2.74% |
| CUZ | $27.78 | +0.11% | 4.7B | 84.17 | $0.33 | +4.61% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs DLR-PJ Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DLR-PJ trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PJ's competition here
ARE vs DLR-PK Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DLR-PK trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PK's competition here
ARE vs DLR Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DLR trades at $177.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 46.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR's competition here
ARE vs BXP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while BXP trades at $71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is -2393.33. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BXP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while VNO-PM trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PM's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while VNO-PL trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PL's competition here
ARE vs VNO Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while VNO trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 76.79. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO's competition here
ARE vs DLR-PL Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DLR-PL trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PL's competition here
ARE vs CUZ Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CUZ trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 84.17. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CUZ's competition here
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while SLG-PI trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG-PI's competition here
ARE vs KRC Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while KRC trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check KRC's competition here
ARE vs SLG Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while SLG trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -110.27. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while VNO-PN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PN's competition here
ARE vs HIW Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while HIW trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HIW's competition here
ARE vs CDP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CDP trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CDP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while VNO-PO trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PO's competition here
ARE vs DEI Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DEI trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEI's competition here
ARE vs OGCP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while OGCP trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OGCP's competition here
ARE vs FISK Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while FISK trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FISK's competition here
ARE vs ESBA Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while ESBA trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ESBA's competition here
ARE vs CLI Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CLI's competition here
ARE vs WRE Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check WRE's competition here
ARE vs JBGS Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while JBGS trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check JBGS's competition here
ARE vs ELME Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while ELME trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -99.62. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ELME's competition here
ARE vs PGRE Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while PGRE trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PGRE's competition here
ARE vs DEA Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DEA trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEA's competition here
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 999.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CIO-PA trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO-PA's competition here
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while HPP-PC trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -118.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP-PC's competition here
ARE vs HPP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 953.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while HPP trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP's competition here
ARE vs PDM Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 934.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while PDM trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PDM's competition here
ARE vs BDN Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while BDN trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BDN's competition here
ARE vs CXP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CXP's competition here
ARE vs NLOP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 495.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while NLOP trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NLOP's competition here
ARE vs PSTL Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while PSTL trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 51.37. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PSTL's competition here
ARE vs CIO Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CIO trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO's competition here
ARE vs FSP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while FSP trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FSP's competition here
ARE vs EQC Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC's competition here
ARE vs ONL Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while ONL trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ONL's competition here
ARE vs NYC Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while NYC trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NYC's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NYC's competition here
ARE vs OPI Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while OPI trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPI's competition here
ARE vs OPINL Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while OPINL trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPINL's competition here
ARE vs CMCT Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CMCT trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCT's competition here
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC-PD's competition here
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DTLA-P's competition here
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCTP's competition here
ARE vs OFC Comparison July 2025
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 14.2B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $82.19, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -632.38, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OFC's competition here