Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. ARE Peers
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $72.63 | -1.01% | 12.6B | 95.57 | $0.76 | +7.26% |
| DLR-PJ | $21.06 | +1.01% | 59.3B | 4.34 | $4.83 | +2.82% |
| DLR | $174.33 | +1.73% | 58.7B | 162.88 | $1.07 | +2.82% |
| DLR-PK | $22.95 | -1.54% | 58.2B | 4.77 | $4.83 | +2.82% |
| BXP | $67.47 | -1.65% | 10.7B | -2248.00 | -$0.03 | +5.82% |
| VNO-PM | $16.55 | -2.93% | 7.5B | 25.73 | $0.64 | +1.94% |
| VNO-PL | $17.09 | -3.77% | 7.4B | 26.51 | $0.64 | +1.94% |
| VNO | $38.24 | -0.13% | 7.3B | 73.54 | $0.52 | +1.94% |
| DLR-PL | $19.98 | -0.35% | 6.8B | 4.15 | $4.83 | +2.82% |
| SLG | $61.90 | +0.24% | 5B | -147.33 | -$0.42 | +4.97% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs DLR-PJ Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DLR-PJ trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DLR Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DLR trades at $174.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 162.88. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DLR-PK Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DLR-PK trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs BXP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while BXP trades at $67.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is -2248.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while VNO-PM trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while VNO-PL trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while VNO trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 73.54. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DLR-PL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DLR-PL trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs SLG Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while SLG trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -147.33. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CUZ Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CUZ trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 90.94. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while SLG-PI trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs KRC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while KRC trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs HIW Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while HIW trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while VNO-PN trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CDP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CDP trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while VNO-PO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DEI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DEI trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 46.97. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OGCP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while OGCP trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs FISK Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while FISK trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs ESBA Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while ESBA trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CLI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs WRE Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs ELME Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while ELME trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -99.31. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs PGRE Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while PGRE trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs JBGS Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while JBGS trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DEA Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 996M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DEA trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 54.10. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 967.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while HPP-PC trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs HPP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while HPP trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs PDM Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 906.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while PDM trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 783.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CIO-PA trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs BDN Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 742M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while BDN trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CXP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs NLOP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 482.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while NLOP trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs PSTL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 350.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while PSTL trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 52.57. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CIO Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CIO trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs FSP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while FSP trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs EQC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs ONL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while ONL trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs NYC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while NYC trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYC's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OPI Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while OPI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OPINL Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while OPINL trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CMCT Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CMCT trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs OFC Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $72.63, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 95.57, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.