Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while DLR trades at $176.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 49.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while DLR-PK trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PK's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while BXP trades at $62.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BXP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while VNO-PL trades at $18.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PL's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while VNO-PM trades at $17.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PM's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while DLR-PL trades at $20.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PL's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while HPP-PC trades at $14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -120.32. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP-PC's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while VNO trades at $29.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while SLG-PI trades at $22.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG-PI's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CUZ trades at $24.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 99.83. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CUZ's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while KRC trades at $32.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check KRC's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CDP trades at $31.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CDP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while VNO-PN trades at $18.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PN's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while VNO-PO trades at $15.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PO's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while SLG trades at $39.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while HIW trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HIW's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CLI trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CLI's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while DEI trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEI's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while OGCP trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OGCP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while FISK trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FISK's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while ESBA trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ESBA's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while WRE trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check WRE's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while PGRE trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PGRE's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while DEA trades at $23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 80.47. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEA's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while PDM trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PDM's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while JBGS trades at $15.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check JBGS's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CXP trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CXP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while PSTL trades at $19.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PSTL's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while BDN trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BDN's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while HPP trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO-PA's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CIO trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while OPINL trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPINL's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while NLOP trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NLOP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while ELME trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ELME's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while EQC trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while ONL trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ONL's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while FSP trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FSP's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while NYC trades at $9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NYC's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while OPI trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPI's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CMCT trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCT's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC-PD's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while OFC trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OFC's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DTLA-P's competition here

ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $53.40, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.36, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCTP's competition here