
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE&M.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $51.28 | -3.46% | 8.9B | -8.17 | -$6.27 | +7.91% |
| BXP | $62.33 | +0.45% | 9.9B | 31.31 | $1.99 | +4.96% |
| VNO-PM | $17.60 | -0.11% | 7.2B | 27.33 | $0.64 | +2.10% |
| VNO-PL | $17.55 | -0.96% | 7B | 27.25 | $0.64 | +2.10% |
| VNO | $35.21 | +0.83% | 6.6B | 9.65 | $3.65 | +2.10% |
| HPP-PC | $14.50 | -0.96% | 5.5B | -116.94 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| CUZ | $27.69 | -0.22% | 4.6B | -922.50 | -$0.03 | +4.62% |
| KRC | $37.03 | +0.35% | 4.3B | 20.24 | $1.83 | +5.84% |
| SLG-PI | $20.84 | -0.43% | 3.8B | 3.08 | $6.77 | +4.55% |
| CDP | $32.65 | +1.75% | 3.7B | 23.83 | $1.37 | +3.78% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs BXP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while BXP trades at $62.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BXP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while VNO-PM trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PM's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while VNO-PL trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PL's competition here
ARE vs VNO Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while VNO trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO's competition here
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while HPP-PC trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -116.94. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP-PC's competition here
ARE vs CUZ Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CUZ trades at $27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is -922.50. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CUZ's competition here
ARE vs KRC Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while KRC trades at $37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check KRC's competition here
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while SLG-PI trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG-PI's competition here
ARE vs CDP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CDP trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CDP's competition here
ARE vs SLG Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while SLG trades at $47.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -19.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while VNO-PN trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PN's competition here
ARE vs HIW Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while HIW trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 33.59. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HIW's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while VNO-PO trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PO's competition here
ARE vs DEI Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while DEI trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is -71.71. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEI's competition here
ARE vs CLI Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CLI's competition here
ARE vs WRE Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check WRE's competition here
ARE vs FISK Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while FISK trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FISK's competition here
ARE vs PGRE Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PGRE's competition here
ARE vs ESBA Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while ESBA trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ESBA's competition here
ARE vs OGCP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while OGCP trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OGCP's competition here
ARE vs DEA Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while DEA trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 108.59. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEA's competition here
ARE vs PDM Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while PDM trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PDM's competition here
ARE vs JBGS Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 866.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while JBGS trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check JBGS's competition here
ARE vs PSTL Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while PSTL trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 43.71. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PSTL's competition here
ARE vs HPP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while HPP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP's competition here
ARE vs CXP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CXP's competition here
ARE vs BDN Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 550.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while BDN trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BDN's competition here
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO-PA's competition here
ARE vs CIO Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO's competition here
ARE vs OPINL Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPINL's competition here
ARE vs ELME Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 180.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while ELME trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ELME's competition here
ARE vs NLOP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while NLOP trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NLOP's competition here
ARE vs EQC Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC's competition here
ARE vs ONL Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while ONL trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ONL's competition here
ARE vs FSP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while FSP trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FSP's competition here
ARE vs NYC Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while NYC trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NYC's competition here
ARE vs OPI Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPI's competition here
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC-PD's competition here
ARE vs CMCT Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 25.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CMCT trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCT's competition here
ARE vs OFC Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OFC's competition here
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DTLA-P's competition here
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCTP's competition here
ARE vs PKY Comparison June 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $51.28, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.17, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PKY's competition here