Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE&M.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $48.37 | -3.01% | 8.6B | 5.85 | $8.44 | +6.99% |
| BXP | $66.81 | -4.52% | 10.9B | 10.09 | $6.80 | +4.05% |
| VNO-PO | $14.83 | -1.40% | 7.7B | 3.80 | $3.98 | +1.87% |
| VNO-PN | $17.75 | -0.50% | 7.7B | 4.49 | $3.98 | +1.87% |
| VNO | $37.89 | -6.90% | 7.4B | 17.93 | $2.20 | +1.87% |
| VNO-PM | $17.86 | -1.01% | 7.3B | 4.49 | $3.98 | +1.87% |
| VNO-PL | $17.74 | -1.17% | 7.2B | 4.73 | $3.80 | +1.87% |
| HPP-PC | $14.24 | -2.80% | 5.6B | -2.52 | -$5.82 | N/A |
| CUZ | $30.16 | -1.58% | 5.1B | 10.87 | $2.83 | +4.17% |
| KRC | $38.31 | -2.62% | 4.5B | 12.01 | $3.23 | +5.56% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs BXP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while BXP trades at $66.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BXP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while VNO-PO trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PO's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while VNO-PN trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PN's competition here
ARE vs VNO Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while VNO trades at $37.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while VNO-PM trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PM's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while VNO-PL trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PL's competition here
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while HPP-PC trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP-PC's competition here
ARE vs CUZ Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CUZ trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CUZ's competition here
ARE vs KRC Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while KRC trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check KRC's competition here
ARE vs CDP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CDP trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CDP's competition here
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while SLG-PI trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG-PI's competition here
ARE vs SLG Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while SLG trades at $48.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG's competition here
ARE vs HIW Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while HIW trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HIW's competition here
ARE vs DEI Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while DEI trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEI's competition here
ARE vs CLI Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CLI's competition here
ARE vs WRE Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check WRE's competition here
ARE vs PGRE Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PGRE's competition here
ARE vs OPI Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while OPI trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPI's competition here
ARE vs PDM Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while PDM trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PDM's competition here
ARE vs DEA Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while DEA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEA's competition here
ARE vs FISK Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 991.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while FISK trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FISK's competition here
ARE vs OGCP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 964.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while OGCP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OGCP's competition here
ARE vs ESBA Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 923.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while ESBA trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ESBA's competition here
ARE vs HPP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while HPP trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP's competition here
ARE vs CXP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CXP's competition here
ARE vs BDN Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 558.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while BDN trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BDN's competition here
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO-PA's competition here
ARE vs CIO Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO's competition here
ARE vs OPINL Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPINL's competition here
ARE vs EQC Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC's competition here
ARE vs NLOP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while NLOP trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NLOP's competition here
ARE vs ONL Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while ONL trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ONL's competition here
ARE vs ELME Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while ELME trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ELME's competition here
ARE vs FSP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while FSP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FSP's competition here
ARE vs NYC Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while NYC trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NYC's competition here
ARE vs CMCT Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CMCT trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCT's competition here
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC-PD's competition here
ARE vs OFC Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OFC's competition here
ARE vs PKY Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is -16.38. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PKY's competition here
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DTLA-P's competition here
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison July 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $48.37, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.85, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCTP's competition here