Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE&M.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $46.26 | +1.49% | 8.1B | -7.38 | -$6.27 | +8.81% |
| DLR | $195.31 | +0.27% | 68.6B | 51.80 | $3.77 | +2.49% |
| DLR-PK | $22.94 | -0.26% | 54.3B | 4.75 | $4.83 | +2.49% |
| BXP | $59.43 | -0.05% | 9.4B | 29.87 | $1.99 | +5.17% |
| VNO-PM | $17.88 | +0.45% | 7.3B | 27.76 | $0.64 | +2.30% |
| VNO-PL | $17.97 | -0.06% | 7.2B | 27.90 | $0.64 | +2.30% |
| DLR-PL | $20.37 | -0.05% | 7B | 4.21 | $4.83 | +2.49% |
| VNO | $32.16 | +0.37% | 6.1B | 8.81 | $3.65 | +2.30% |
| HPP-PC | $15.69 | +4.95% | 5.9B | -125.65 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| CUZ | $26.76 | +1.94% | 4.4B | -892.33 | -$0.03 | +4.78% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs DLR Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while DLR trades at $195.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 51.80. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR's competition here
ARE vs DLR-PK Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while DLR-PK trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PK's competition here
ARE vs BXP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while BXP trades at $59.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BXP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while VNO-PM trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PM's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while VNO-PL trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PL's competition here
ARE vs DLR-PL Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while DLR-PL trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PL's competition here
ARE vs VNO Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while VNO trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO's competition here
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while HPP-PC trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -125.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP-PC's competition here
ARE vs CUZ Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CUZ trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is -892.33. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CUZ's competition here
ARE vs KRC Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while KRC trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check KRC's competition here
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while SLG-PI trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG-PI's competition here
ARE vs CDP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CDP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CDP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while VNO-PN trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PN's competition here
ARE vs SLG Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while SLG trades at $45.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while VNO-PO trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PO's competition here
ARE vs HIW Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while HIW trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HIW's competition here
ARE vs DEI Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while DEI trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is -72.76. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEI's competition here
ARE vs CLI Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CLI's competition here
ARE vs WRE Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check WRE's competition here
ARE vs OGCP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while OGCP trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OGCP's competition here
ARE vs FISK Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while FISK trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FISK's competition here
ARE vs ESBA Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while ESBA trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ESBA's competition here
ARE vs PGRE Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PGRE's competition here
ARE vs DEA Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while DEA trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEA's competition here
ARE vs PDM Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while PDM trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PDM's competition here
ARE vs JBGS Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 916.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while JBGS trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check JBGS's competition here
ARE vs PSTL Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 817.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while PSTL trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 44.77. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PSTL's competition here
ARE vs CXP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CXP's competition here
ARE vs HPP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 593.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while HPP trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP's competition here
ARE vs BDN Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 538.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while BDN trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BDN's competition here
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO-PA's competition here
ARE vs CIO Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO's competition here
ARE vs OPINL Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPINL's competition here
ARE vs ELME Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while ELME trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ELME's competition here
ARE vs NLOP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while NLOP trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NLOP's competition here
ARE vs EQC Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC's competition here
ARE vs ONL Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 164.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while ONL trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ONL's competition here
ARE vs FSP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while FSP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FSP's competition here
ARE vs NYC Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while NYC trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NYC's competition here
ARE vs OPI Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPI's competition here
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC-PD's competition here
ARE vs CMCT Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 47.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CMCT trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCT's competition here
ARE vs PKY Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PKY's competition here
ARE vs OFC Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OFC's competition here
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCTP's competition here
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison May 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $46.26, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.38, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DTLA-P's competition here