Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE&M.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARE | $54.53 | +1.51% | 9.4B | -6.41 | -$8.44 | +8.68% |
| DLR | $178.57 | +0.19% | 61.7B | 50.31 | $3.57 | +2.71% |
| DLR-PK | $24.06 | -0.25% | 57.2B | 4.99 | $4.83 | +2.71% |
| BXP | $60.40 | +1.50% | 9.6B | 34.65 | $1.74 | +5.57% |
| VNO-PL | $18.27 | -0.68% | 7.3B | 28.36 | $0.64 | +2.58% |
| VNO-PM | $17.77 | -0.17% | 7.2B | 27.64 | $0.64 | +2.58% |
| DLR-PL | $20.96 | -0.19% | 7.2B | 4.34 | $4.83 | +2.71% |
| HPP-PC | $14.40 | -2.04% | 5.5B | -116.13 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $28.53 | +2.24% | 5.5B | 6.81 | $4.20 | +2.58% |
| SLG-PI | $22.23 | +0.09% | 4.1B | 3.31 | $6.77 | +8.16% |
Stock Comparison
ARE vs DLR Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while DLR trades at $178.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 50.31. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR's competition here
ARE vs DLR-PK Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while DLR-PK trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PK's competition here
ARE vs BXP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while BXP trades at $60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BXP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PL Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while VNO-PL trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PL's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PM Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while VNO-PM trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PM's competition here
ARE vs DLR-PL Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while DLR-PL trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DLR-PL's competition here
ARE vs HPP-PC Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while HPP-PC trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -116.13. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP-PC's competition here
ARE vs VNO Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while VNO trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO's competition here
ARE vs SLG-PI Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while SLG-PI trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG-PI's competition here
ARE vs CUZ Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CUZ trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 97.96. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CUZ's competition here
ARE vs KRC Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while KRC trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check KRC's competition here
ARE vs CDP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CDP trades at $32.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CDP's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PN Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while VNO-PN trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PN's competition here
ARE vs VNO-PO Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while VNO-PO trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check VNO-PO's competition here
ARE vs SLG Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while SLG trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check SLG's competition here
ARE vs HIW Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while HIW trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HIW's competition here
ARE vs CLI Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CLI's competition here
ARE vs DEI Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while DEI trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 114.78. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEI's competition here
ARE vs ESBA Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while ESBA trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ESBA's competition here
ARE vs FISK Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while FISK trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FISK's competition here
ARE vs WRE Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check WRE's competition here
ARE vs OGCP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while OGCP trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OGCP's competition here
ARE vs PGRE Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PGRE's competition here
ARE vs DEA Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while DEA trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 77.95. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DEA's competition here
ARE vs PDM Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 963.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while PDM trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PDM's competition here
ARE vs JBGS Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 925M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while JBGS trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check JBGS's competition here
ARE vs CXP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CXP's competition here
ARE vs PSTL Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 675.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while PSTL trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check PSTL's competition here
ARE vs BDN Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while BDN trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check BDN's competition here
ARE vs HPP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while HPP trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check HPP's competition here
ARE vs CIO-PA Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO-PA's competition here
ARE vs CIO Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CIO's competition here
ARE vs OPINL Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPINL's competition here
ARE vs NLOP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 202.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while NLOP trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NLOP's competition here
ARE vs ELME Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while ELME trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ELME's competition here
ARE vs EQC Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC's competition here
ARE vs ONL Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while ONL trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check ONL's competition here
ARE vs FSP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while FSP trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check FSP's competition here
ARE vs NYC Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while NYC trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check NYC's competition here
ARE vs OPI Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OPI's competition here
ARE vs CMCT Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CMCT trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCT's competition here
ARE vs EQC-PD Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check EQC-PD's competition here
ARE vs OFC Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check OFC's competition here
ARE vs DTLA-P Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check DTLA-P's competition here
ARE vs CMCTP Comparison February 2026
ARE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARE stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARE is priced at $54.53, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARE currently has a P/E ratio of -6.41, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARE is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARE.Check CMCTP's competition here