Aptiv PLC
Aptiv PLC APTV-PA Peers
See (APTV-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
APTV-PA vs FYGGY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs DNZOY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.36B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while DNZOY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs DNZOF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 34.68B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BRDCF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BRDCF trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BRDCY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.86B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BRDCY trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MGDDF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.40B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MGDDF trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MGDDY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.10B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MGDDY trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CTTAF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.55B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CTTAF trades at $82.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs KNRRY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.49B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while KNRRY trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CTTAY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.28B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CTTAY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs KNBHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while KNBHF trades at $98.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SMTOY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SMTOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs APTV Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12.67B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while APTV trades at $58.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MBLY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MBLY trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PTAIY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PTAIY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PTAIF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HLLGY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HLKHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LKQ Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LKQ trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MGA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 9.35B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MGA trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ASEKY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.09B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ASEKY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ALSN Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ALSN trades at $97.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ASEKF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ALV Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ALV trades at $93.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BWA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BWA trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NGKSF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PLLIF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PLLIF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SFFLY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SFFLY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GNTX Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GNTX trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NGKSY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NGKSY trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MOD Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MOD trades at $90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LEA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LEA trades at $86.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs KOTMF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while KOTMF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs YORUF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs YORUY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FESTF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BRBOY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs DORM Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while DORM trades at $122.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BC-PB Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs KOTMY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while KOTMY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SCFLF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GT Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GT trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BC-PA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BC-PA trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs BRBOF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while BRBOF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs STAEY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MNTHY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MNTHY trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SMTUF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs STAEF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs TDBOF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VLEEY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VLEEY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NHKGF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VTSCF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MNTHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GTX Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GTX trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HSAI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HSAI trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -156.91. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LIMAF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LIMAF trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NPSKF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VC trades at $80.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs QS Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while QS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NPSKY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NPSKY trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs DAN Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while DAN trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -60.83. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs TGOSY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ARBFF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs JELCF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NKRKY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NKRKY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -34.90. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VLEEF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VLEEF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs JEHLY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MBUMY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MBUMY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MBUMF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GMPUF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PHIN Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PHIN trades at $41.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs UNIEF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GUDDY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NTXVF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NTXVF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FURCF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PASTF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NIFCY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ADNT Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ADNT trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -630.50. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NKRKF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.88M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -36.61. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs TIANF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs XPEL Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 924.41M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while XPEL trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GUDHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 868.57M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FOXF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 840.09M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FOXF trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 125.88. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SFHLF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 826.18M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SFHLF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs THRM Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 793.71M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while THRM trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ATNNF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ABDDF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FAURY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 623.92M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SMP Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 620.52M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SMP trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PLOW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 588.55M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PLOW trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GTXAP Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.94M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FCVFF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AEVA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 503.91M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AEVA trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ALLG Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.92M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ECX Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 493.65M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ECX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AXL Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 489.90M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AXL trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MLR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 481.98M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MLR trades at $42.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CPS Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 446.60M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CPS trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs TCISF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MRETF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 414.40M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MRETF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRETF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NMAKF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 403.30M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NMAKF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SAEOF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VTSCY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MNRO Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 399.82M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MNRO trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PWRHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs XNGIF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while XNGIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ELLRY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 304.13M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs EGKLF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SES Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 297.44M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SES trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NPSGF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HYLN Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 271.61M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HYLN trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HLLY-WT Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 261.50M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NPSGY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 256.79M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HLLY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 244.86M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HLLY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs IOCJY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AKBIF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.27M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MPAA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 177.82M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MPAA trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs EXCOF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 174.32M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while EXCOF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LAZR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 169.75M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LAZR trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs WLMTF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.91M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs XL Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.38M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AMGRF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HWAFF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs KGAUF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 150.54M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs STRT Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 146.86M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while STRT trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SCTH Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs INVZ Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 139.27M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while INVZ trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs INVZW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 128.79M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while INVZW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SRI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 122.25M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SRI trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CAAS Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 120.68M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CAAS trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs KNDI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 95.22M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while KNDI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GGROW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SUP Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 75.57M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SUP trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUP's ROE of -213.78%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GGR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 74.43M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GGR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CAOHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MKDW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 48.18M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MKDW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs WPRT Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 47.48M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while WPRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs STSGF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NWFAF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SYPR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 35.62M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SYPR trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LEAT Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LEAT trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CVGI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CVGI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VOAXF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CREVF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ECXWW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.99M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CCEGF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NCNCW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NCNC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AMV Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.83M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMV's ROE of +13.81%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs WKSP Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while WKSP trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs INEO Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 13.32M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while INEO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CMMCF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LIDRW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs LIDR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while LIDR trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SAG Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CREV Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CREV trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ATHHF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs UFMG Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AMTY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AMTY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AFFL Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AFFL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs OPTI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs NFGRF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs UFAB Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SPKTF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CDTI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CDTI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SVTE Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SVTE has a market cap of 885287.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SVTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SVTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVTE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SVTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs GTLA Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, GTLA has a market cap of 590600.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while GTLA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas GTLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to GTLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs WKSPW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575286.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MWWC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MWWC has a market cap of 572891.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MWWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MWWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MWWC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MWWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AGRS Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AGRS has a market cap of 500000.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AGRS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AGRS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AGRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FRSX Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 448060.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FRSX trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs OMTK Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, OMTK has a market cap of 438962.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while OMTK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas OMTK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to OMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CREVW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 182834.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CREVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs TRBD Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, TRBD has a market cap of 100000.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while TRBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas TRBD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRBD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to TRBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs EGTK Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, EGTK has a market cap of 51353.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while EGTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas EGTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to EGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HYZNW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15529.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CAGR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CAGR has a market cap of 9438.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CAGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to CAGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PFTI Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PFTI has a market cap of 6902.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PFTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PFTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PFTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PFTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ADEC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ADEC has a market cap of 6680.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ADEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ADEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ADEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VYDR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VYDR has a market cap of 6230.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VYDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VYDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VYDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VYDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs STCC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, STCC has a market cap of 4728.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while STCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas STCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to STCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs UFABQ Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, UFABQ has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while UFABQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas UFABQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFABQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to UFABQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ODYC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ODYC has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ODYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ODYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODYC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ODYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs DTRO Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, DTRO has a market cap of 3364.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while DTRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas DTRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTRO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to DTRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs AZDDQ Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, AZDDQ has a market cap of 1969.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while AZDDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas AZDDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZDDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to AZDDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs SNSGF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, SNSGF has a market cap of 1618.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while SNSGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas SNSGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNSGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to SNSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs PLNTQ Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, PLNTQ has a market cap of 1578.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while PLNTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas PLNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLNTQ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to PLNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs TXIC Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, TXIC has a market cap of 1453.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while TXIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas TXIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TXIC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to TXIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs CSHEF Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, CSHEF has a market cap of 902.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while CSHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas CSHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSHEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to CSHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs FLES Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, FLES has a market cap of 885.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while FLES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas FLES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLES's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to FLES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs JBZY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, JBZY has a market cap of 834.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while JBZY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas JBZY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to JBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ATCV Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ATCV has a market cap of 711.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ATCV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ATCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATCV's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ATCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ESWW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ESWW has a market cap of 68.00. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ESWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ESWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESWW's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to ESWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MOTUY Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MOTUY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MOTUY trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MOTUY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOTUY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MOTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MKDWW Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MKDWW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs MTOR Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, MTOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs RMO Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, RMO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs ENVS Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, ENVS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while ENVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas ENVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to ENVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs VNE Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, VNE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs USAM Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, USAM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while USAM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas USAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to USAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HLRD Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HLRD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HLRD trades at $417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is less volatile compared to HLRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
APTV-PA vs HZN Comparison
APTV-PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APTV-PA stands at 29.42B. In comparison, HZN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, APTV-PA is priced at $108.66, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APTV-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 92.08, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APTV-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APTV-PA is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APTV-PA.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto-Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.07B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.42% |
| DNZOY | $13.26 | -0.38% | 37.36B | 13.13 | $1.01 | +1.58% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -8.73% | 34.68B | 12.31 | $1.00 | +3.15% |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.42B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| BRDCF | $42.48 | +18.33% | 29.09B | 14.60 | $2.91 | +3.10% |
| BRDCY | $21.07 | -0.28% | 28.86B | 14.73 | $1.43 | +1.70% |
| MGDDF | $37.41 | +4.83% | 26.40B | 3.35 | $11.17 | +3.92% |
| MGDDY | $18.49 | +0.49% | 26.10B | 8.28 | $2.23 | +3.94% |
| CTTAF | $82.73 | +2.07% | 16.55B | 12.53 | $6.60 | +3.01% |
| KNRRY | $25.58 | +1.55% | 16.49B | 32.79 | $0.78 | +0.99% |