AirNet Technology Inc.
AirNet Technology Inc. ANTE Peers
See (ANTE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANTE | $1.08 | +56.98% | 14.8M | -1.09 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| TMUS | $227.59 | -2.03% | 259.1B | 22.30 | $10.23 | +1.72% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $23.19 | +0.39% | 205.7B | 4.53 | $5.12 | +5.77% |
| T | $26.97 | -4.04% | 198.6B | 16.94 | $1.63 | +4.02% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| VZ | $41.75 | -2.03% | 177.1B | 10.00 | $4.20 | +8.02% |
| T-PA | $20.36 | -1.50% | 147.2B | 8.61 | $2.38 | +4.02% |
| T-PC | $19.36 | -1.82% | 139.7B | 8.17 | $2.38 | +4.02% |
| CMCSA | $35.19 | -1.20% | 131.9B | 8.72 | $4.06 | +4.48% |
Stock Comparison
ANTE vs TMUS Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 259.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TMUS trades at $227.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs VZA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TBB Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 205.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TBB trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs T Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 198.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while T trades at $26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TBC Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs VZ Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while VZ trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs T-PA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while T-PA trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs T-PC Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 139.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while T-PC trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CMCSA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CMCSA trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs AMOV Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CHTR Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CHTR trades at $396.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs AMX Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while AMX trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CHT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CHT trades at $44.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs ORAN Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TEF Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TEF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -51.95. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs VOD Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while VOD trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TU Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TU trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs BCE Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while BCE trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 77.65. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs VIV Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while VIV trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs RCI Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while RCI trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TLK Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TLK trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs SJR Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBRDA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBRDA trades at $95.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBRDK Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBRDK trades at $95.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBRDP Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBRDP trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs KT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while KT trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TIMB Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TIMB trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs MBT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs FYBR Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while FYBR trades at $36.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs SKM Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while SKM trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CTDD Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CTDD trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TIGO Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TIGO trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs USM Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while USM trades at $70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -146.93. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs UZF Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while UZF trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs UZE Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while UZE trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs UZD Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while UZD trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TKC Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TKC trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CTBB Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CTBB trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs PHI Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while PHI trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LUMN Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LUMN trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBYKV Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TDS Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TDS trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TDS-PV Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TDS-PV trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TDS-PU Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TDS-PU trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs SNRE Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while SNRE trades at $55.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBTYB Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBTYB trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBTYK Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBTYK trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBTYA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBTYA trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -16.49. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs IRDM Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while IRDM trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs GSAT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while GSAT trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -44.08. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs VEON Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while VEON trades at $49.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs DISH Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TEO Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TEO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 86.40. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CCOI Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CCOI trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs GOGO Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while GOGO trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -386.12. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs IHS Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while IHS trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs ASTSW Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs IDT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while IDT trades at $60.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs RADI Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LILAK Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LILAK trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LILA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LILA trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs ATUS Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while ATUS trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs SHEN Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 816.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while SHEN trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -21.26. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CABO Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 746.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CABO trades at $125.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -36.73. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs RBBN Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 715.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while RBBN trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CNSL Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs ATEX Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while ATEX trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -39.59. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs OOMA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while OOMA trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -66.11. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs WOW Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while WOW trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs HCHC Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs ATNI Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while ATNI trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TV Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 231.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TV trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs RDCM Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while RDCM trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CXDO Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 173.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CXDO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 74.88. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs FNGR Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while FNGR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs MTSL Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs PCLA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while PCLA trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TDI Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TDI trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs SIFY Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while SIFY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs KORE Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while KORE trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs IQST Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while IQST trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs MIMO Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs UCL Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while UCL trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs QTEK Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs QTEKW Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs COMSP Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs COMSW Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs UZA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs STRY Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs PTNR Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs ALSK Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs OIBR-C Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs MIMO-WT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LORL Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TDA Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs TIGOR Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs CBB Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs LBYAV Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.
ANTE vs GTT Comparison
ANTE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANTE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANTE is priced at $1.08, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANTE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANTE's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ANTE is more volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANTE.