Autoliv, Inc.
Autoliv, Inc. ALV Peers
See (ALV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALV | $105.25 | -0.35% | 8.1B | 12.15 | $8.66 | +2.64% |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $67.17 | +0.79% | 14.6B | 10.78 | $6.23 | N/A |
| MBLY | $16.15 | -4.32% | 13.1B | -4.39 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| MGA | $37.25 | +1.72% | 10.5B | 9.29 | $4.01 | +5.14% |
| LKQ | $39.28 | +0.49% | 10.1B | 14.60 | $2.69 | +3.05% |
| ALSN | $101.05 | -2.42% | 8.5B | 11.70 | $8.64 | +1.02% |
| BWA | $32.62 | +0.99% | 7.2B | 22.97 | $1.42 | +1.35% |
| GNTX | $21.64 | +1.07% | 4.9B | 12.65 | $1.71 | +2.21% |
| LEA | $90.44 | +2.23% | 4.8B | 10.57 | $8.56 | +3.39% |
Stock Comparison
ALV vs APTV-PA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs APTV Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while APTV trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MBLY Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MBLY trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MGA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MGA trades at $37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs LKQ Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while LKQ trades at $39.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs ALSN Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while ALSN trades at $101.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs BWA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while BWA trades at $32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs GNTX Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while GNTX trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs LEA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while LEA trades at $90.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MOD Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MOD trades at $90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs DORM Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while DORM trades at $127.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs BC-PB Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs BC-PA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while BC-PA trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs GT Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while GT trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs HSAI Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while HSAI trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2027.00. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs DAN Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while DAN trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -72.21. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs QS Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while QS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs VC Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while VC trades at $84.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs GTX Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while GTX trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs PHIN Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while PHIN trades at $43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs ADNT Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while ADNT trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs AEVA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while AEVA trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs FOXF Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while FOXF trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs XPEL Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while XPEL trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs THRM Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 857.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while THRM trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs SMP Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 664M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while SMP trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs PLOW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 661M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while PLOW trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs ECX Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 558.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while ECX trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs GTXAP Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MLR Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 524.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MLR trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MNRO Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 517.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MNRO trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -78.45. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs AXL Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 504.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while AXL trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs ALLG Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs CPS Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 393.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while CPS trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs SES Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 379.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while SES trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs HYLN Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while HYLN trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs HLLY Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 257.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while HLLY trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs HLLY-WT Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs STRT Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 229.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while STRT trades at $55.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MPAA Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 190.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MPAA trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs INVZ Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while INVZ trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs INVZW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs SRI Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while SRI trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs XL Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs LAZR Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while LAZR trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs CAAS Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while CAAS trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs KNDI Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while KNDI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs GGR Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while GGR trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs CVGI Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while CVGI trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs WPRT Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while WPRT trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MKDWW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs SYPR Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while SYPR trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MKDW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MKDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs ECXWW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs NCNCW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs NCNC Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs WKSP Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while WKSP trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs AMV Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs LIDR Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while LIDR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs LIDRW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs SUP Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while SUP trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs INEO Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while INEO trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs FRSX Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while FRSX trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs SAG Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs CREV Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while CREV trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs GGROW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs UFAB Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs WKSPW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs CREVW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 124.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs HYZNW Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs HZN Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs RMO Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs VNE Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.
ALV vs MTOR Comparison
ALV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALV stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALV is priced at $105.25, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALV currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, ALV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALV is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALV.