Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. ALSN Peers
See (ALSN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALSN | $106.16 | -0.02% | 8.94B | 12.29 | $8.64 | +0.98% |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.42B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $67.32 | -1.38% | 14.66B | 11.00 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $15.72 | -1.50% | 12.76B | -4.27 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| LKQ | $42.32 | -0.56% | 10.92B | 15.73 | $2.69 | +2.84% |
| MGA | $36.62 | -0.19% | 10.32B | 9.13 | $4.01 | +5.27% |
| ALV | $102.03 | +0.08% | 7.89B | 11.78 | $8.66 | +2.71% |
| BWA | $33.06 | -0.81% | 7.26B | 23.28 | $1.42 | +1.33% |
| MOD | $104.08 | -0.43% | 5.47B | 35.04 | $2.97 | N/A |
| GNTX | $23.04 | -0.13% | 5.18B | 13.47 | $1.71 | +2.09% |
Stock Comparison
ALSN vs APTV-PA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs APTV Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while APTV trades at $67.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MBLY Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 12.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MBLY trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs LKQ Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while LKQ trades at $42.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MGA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MGA trades at $36.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs ALV Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 7.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while ALV trades at $102.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs BWA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while BWA trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MOD Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MOD trades at $104.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs GNTX Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while GNTX trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs LEA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while LEA trades at $94.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs DORM Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while DORM trades at $130.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs BC-PB Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs BC-PA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while BC-PA trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs GT Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while GT trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs HSAI Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while HSAI trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -176.91. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs GTX Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while GTX trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs DAN Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while DAN trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs VC Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while VC trades at $85.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs QS Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while QS trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs PHIN Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while PHIN trades at $44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs ADNT Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while ADNT trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs FOXF Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while FOXF trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs XPEL Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while XPEL trades at $37.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs AEVA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 857.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while AEVA trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs THRM Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 854.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while THRM trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs PLOW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 664.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while PLOW trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs SMP Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 654.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while SMP trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs GTXAP Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs AXL Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 536.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while AXL trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MLR Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 535.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MLR trades at $46.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs ALLG Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs ECX Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 487.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while ECX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs CPS Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 413.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while CPS trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MNRO Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 412.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MNRO trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs SES Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 313.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while SES trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs HLLY-WT Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 259.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs HLLY Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 257.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while HLLY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs HYLN Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 233.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while HYLN trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs STRT Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 210.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while STRT trades at $50.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MPAA Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 210.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MPAA trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs LAZR Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 206.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while LAZR trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs INVZ Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 198.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while INVZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs INVZW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 196.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while INVZW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs XL Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs SRI Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 150.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while SRI trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs CAAS Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 122.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while CAAS trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs KNDI Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 103.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while KNDI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs GGR Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 79.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while GGR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs CVGI Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 50.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while CVGI trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs WPRT Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 49.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while WPRT trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs MKDW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 46.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while MKDW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs SYPR Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 37.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while SYPR trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs ECXWW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 25.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while ECXWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs NCNCW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs NCNC Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs AMV Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs LIDRW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 15.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs SUP Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 15.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while SUP trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs WKSP Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 14.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while WKSP trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs LIDR Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 13.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while LIDR trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs SAG Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs INEO Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 9.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while INEO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs CREV Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 6.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while CREV trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs GGROW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 5.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs UFAB Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs WKSPW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575286.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs FRSX Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 379297.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while FRSX trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs CREVW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 139568.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.
ALSN vs HYZNW Comparison
ALSN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSN stands at 8.94B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15529.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALSN is priced at $106.16, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ALSN's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSN is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSN.