Allego N.V.
Allego N.V. ALLG Peers
See (ALLG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLG | $1.82 | -10.78% | 496.9M | -3.96 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $72.19 | +0.00% | 15.8B | 11.86 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $18.91 | +0.03% | 15.5B | -5.20 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| MGA | $41.75 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 10.38 | $4.01 | +4.61% |
| LKQ | $38.57 | +0.00% | 10B | 14.38 | $2.69 | +3.10% |
| ALV | $118.34 | +0.00% | 9.1B | 13.60 | $8.66 | +2.36% |
| ALSN | $97.71 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 11.33 | $8.64 | +1.06% |
| BWA | $35.54 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 24.87 | $1.42 | +1.25% |
| LEA | $103.20 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 12.10 | $8.56 | +2.97% |
Stock Comparison
ALLG vs APTV-PA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs APTV Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while APTV trades at $72.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MBLY Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MBLY trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MGA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MGA trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs LKQ Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while LKQ trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs ALV Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while ALV trades at $118.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs ALSN Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while ALSN trades at $97.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs BWA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while BWA trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs LEA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while LEA trades at $103.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MOD Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MOD trades at $102.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs GNTX Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while GNTX trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs QS Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while QS trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs DORM Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while DORM trades at $127.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs BC-PB Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs BC-PA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while BC-PA trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs GT Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while GT trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs HSAI Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while HSAI trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2190.00. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs VC Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while VC trades at $102.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs DAN Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while DAN trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -74.25. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs GTX Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while GTX trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs PHIN Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while PHIN trades at $47.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs ADNT Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while ADNT trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs AEVA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while AEVA trades at $30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs FOXF Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while FOXF trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs XPEL Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while XPEL trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs THRM Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 949.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while THRM trades at $30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs SMP Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 734.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while SMP trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs PLOW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 727.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while PLOW trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs ECX Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while ECX trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs GTXAP Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MLR Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MLR trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs AXL Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 519.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while AXL trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MNRO Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 498.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MNRO trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -75.59. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs CPS Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 422.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while CPS trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs SES Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 326.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while SES trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs STRT Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while STRT trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs INVZ Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while INVZ trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs HLLY Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while HLLY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs INVZW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 255.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs HYLN Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while HYLN trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MPAA Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MPAA trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs SRI Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while SRI trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs HLLY-WT Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs XL Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs LAZR Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while LAZR trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs CAAS Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while CAAS trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs KNDI Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while KNDI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs GGR Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while GGR trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs CVGI Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while CVGI trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs WPRT Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while WPRT trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs SYPR Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while SYPR trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -109.50. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MKDW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MKDW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MKDWW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs ECXWW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while ECXWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs LIDR Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while LIDR trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs NCNCW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs NCNC Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs LIDRW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs WKSP Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while WKSP trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs AMV Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs INEO Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while INEO trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs FRSX Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while FRSX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs SAG Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs SUP Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs GGROW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs CREV Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while CREV trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs UFAB Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs WKSPW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs CREVW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 132.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs HYZNW Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs RMO Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs VNE Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs MTOR Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.
ALLG vs HZN Comparison
ALLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLG stands at 496.9M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALLG is priced at $1.82, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.96, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLG's ROE is +4.17%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLG is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLG.