Embotelladora Andina S.A.
Embotelladora Andina S.A. (AKO-B) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AKO-B) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKO-B | $22.27 | +0.54% | 3.3B | 14.48 | $1.53 | +1.11% |
| KO | $69.17 | +0.10% | 297.8B | 24.53 | $2.82 | +2.88% |
| PEP | $143.45 | -0.73% | 196.4B | 26.13 | $5.49 | +3.82% |
| MNST | $60.66 | +0.80% | 59.2B | 39.91 | $1.52 | N/A |
| CCEP | $100.04 | -0.13% | 46.1B | 27.79 | $3.60 | +2.22% |
| KDP | $33.27 | -0.89% | 45.2B | 29.46 | $1.13 | +2.77% |
| KOF | $85.55 | -1.69% | 18B | 23.23 | $3.68 | +3.76% |
| CELH | $46.64 | +0.71% | 12B | 141.36 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $29.00 | +0.97% | 10.9B | -263.73 | -$0.11 | +4.15% |
| COKE | $118.80 | +6.25% | 10.3B | 17.68 | $6.72 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
AKO-B vs KO Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 297.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while KO trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check KO's competition here
AKO-B vs PEP Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 196.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while PEP trades at $143.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check PEP's competition here
AKO-B vs MNST Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while MNST trades at $60.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check MNST's competition here
AKO-B vs CCEP Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while CCEP trades at $100.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check CCEP's competition here
AKO-B vs KDP Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while KDP trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check KDP's competition here
AKO-B vs KOF Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while KOF trades at $85.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check KOF's competition here
AKO-B vs CELH Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while CELH trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 141.36. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check CELH's competition here
AKO-B vs PRMB Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while PRMB trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -263.73. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check PRMB's competition here
AKO-B vs COKE Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while COKE trades at $118.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check COKE's competition here
AKO-B vs FIZZ Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while FIZZ trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check FIZZ's competition here
AKO-B vs PRMW Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check PRMW's competition here
AKO-B vs AKO-A Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while AKO-A trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check AKO-A's competition here
AKO-B vs COCO Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while COCO trades at $37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check COCO's competition here
AKO-B vs OTLY Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 458.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while OTLY trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check OTLY's competition here
AKO-B vs ZVIA Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 217M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while ZVIA trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check ZVIA's competition here
AKO-B vs SHOT Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while SHOT trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -15.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check SHOT's competition here
AKO-B vs REED Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while REED trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check REED's competition here
AKO-B vs BRFH Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while BRFH trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check BRFH's competition here
AKO-B vs WTER Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check WTER's competition here
AKO-B vs NBEV Comparison July 2025
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $22.27, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 14.48, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check NBEV's competition here