Embotelladora Andina S.A.
Embotelladora Andina S.A. (AKO-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AKO-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKO-A | $17.67 | -5.89% | 3.1B | 11.55 | $1.53 | +1.11% |
| KO | $68.10 | -1.54% | 293B | 24.15 | $2.82 | +2.88% |
| PEP | $141.57 | -1.31% | 193.8B | 25.79 | $5.49 | +3.82% |
| MNST | $60.21 | -0.74% | 58.7B | 39.61 | $1.52 | N/A |
| CCEP | $98.16 | -1.88% | 45.2B | 27.12 | $3.62 | +2.22% |
| KDP | $32.97 | -0.90% | 44.8B | 29.18 | $1.13 | +2.77% |
| KOF | $83.19 | -2.76% | 17.5B | 22.48 | $3.70 | +3.76% |
| CELH | $46.95 | +0.66% | 12.1B | 142.27 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $28.33 | -2.31% | 10.7B | -257.50 | -$0.11 | +4.15% |
| COKE | $116.19 | -2.20% | 10.1B | 17.32 | $6.71 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
AKO-A vs KO Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while KO trades at $68.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check KO's competition here
AKO-A vs PEP Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while PEP trades at $141.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check PEP's competition here
AKO-A vs MNST Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while MNST trades at $60.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check MNST's competition here
AKO-A vs CCEP Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while CCEP trades at $98.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check CCEP's competition here
AKO-A vs KDP Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while KDP trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check KDP's competition here
AKO-A vs KOF Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while KOF trades at $83.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check KOF's competition here
AKO-A vs CELH Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while CELH trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 142.27. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check CELH's competition here
AKO-A vs PRMB Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while PRMB trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -257.50. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check PRMB's competition here
AKO-A vs COKE Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while COKE trades at $116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check COKE's competition here
AKO-A vs FIZZ Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while FIZZ trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check FIZZ's competition here
AKO-A vs PRMW Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A and PRMW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRMW's competition here
AKO-A vs AKO-B Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while AKO-B trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check AKO-B's competition here
AKO-A vs COCO Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while COCO trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check COCO's competition here
AKO-A vs OTLY Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while OTLY trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check OTLY's competition here
AKO-A vs ZVIA Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while ZVIA trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check ZVIA's competition here
AKO-A vs SHOT Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while SHOT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -15.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check SHOT's competition here
AKO-A vs REED Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while REED trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check REED's competition here
AKO-A vs BRFH Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while BRFH trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check BRFH's competition here
AKO-A vs WTER Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 247.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check WTER's competition here
AKO-A vs NBEV Comparison July 2025
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $17.67, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.Check NBEV's competition here