Embotelladora Andina S.A.
Embotelladora Andina S.A. AKO-A Peers
See (AKO-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKO-A | $20.06 | -4.42% | 3.55B | 13.03 | $1.54 | N/A |
| KO | $72.02 | +0.57% | 309.99B | 27.91 | $2.58 | +2.73% |
| PEP | $131.98 | +0.37% | 180.96B | 19.41 | $6.80 | +4.10% |
| MNST | $62.86 | +0.85% | 61.30B | 41.36 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KDP | $33.82 | +0.83% | 45.93B | 30.75 | $1.10 | +2.68% |
| CCEP | $88.30 | +0.56% | 40.69B | 25.67 | $3.44 | +2.54% |
| PRMB | $32.35 | +0.59% | 12.18B | -294.09 | -$0.11 | +3.69% |
| COKE | $1,175.86 | +1.15% | 10.25B | 18.32 | $64.17 | +0.68% |
| CELH | $39.39 | +0.87% | 10.15B | 119.36 | $0.33 | N/A |
| FIZZ | $44.88 | +1.01% | 4.20B | 22.55 | $1.99 | +7.24% |
Stock Comparison
AKO-A vs KO Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 309.99B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while KO trades at $72.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs PEP Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 180.96B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while PEP trades at $131.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs MNST Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 61.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while MNST trades at $62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs KDP Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 45.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while KDP trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs CCEP Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 40.69B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while CCEP trades at $88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs PRMB Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while PRMB trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -294.09. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs COKE Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while COKE trades at $1,175.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs CELH Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 10.15B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while CELH trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 119.36. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs FIZZ Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while FIZZ trades at $44.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs PRMW Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs AKO-B Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while AKO-B trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs COCO Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while COCO trades at $35.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs KOF Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while KOF trades at $92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs OTLY Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 291.80M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while OTLY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs ZVIA Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 199.19M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while ZVIA trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs REED Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 52.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while REED trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs SHOT Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 40.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while SHOT trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs BRFH Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 39.48M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while BRFH trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.
AKO-A vs WTER Comparison
AKO-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-A stands at 3.55B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 582646.00. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-A is priced at $20.06, while WTER trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.03, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AKO-A's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-A is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-A.