Aeva Technologies, Inc.
Aeva Technologies, Inc. AEVA Peers
See (AEVA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEVA | $30.88 | +7.75% | 1.7B | -10.95 | -$2.82 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $72.19 | +0.73% | 15.7B | 11.79 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $18.91 | +4.65% | 15.3B | -5.14 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| MGA | $41.75 | +4.30% | 11.8B | 10.41 | $4.01 | +4.61% |
| LKQ | $38.57 | +1.61% | 10B | 14.33 | $2.69 | +3.10% |
| ALV | $118.34 | +3.25% | 9.1B | 13.66 | $8.66 | +2.36% |
| ALSN | $97.71 | +1.04% | 8.2B | 11.30 | $8.64 | +1.07% |
| BWA | $35.54 | +2.13% | 7.8B | 25.01 | $1.42 | +1.23% |
| LEA | $103.20 | +2.53% | 5.5B | 12.05 | $8.56 | +2.98% |
Stock Comparison
AEVA vs APTV-PA Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs APTV Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while APTV trades at $72.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MBLY Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MBLY trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MGA Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MGA trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs LKQ Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while LKQ trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs ALV Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while ALV trades at $118.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs ALSN Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while ALSN trades at $97.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs BWA Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while BWA trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs LEA Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while LEA trades at $103.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MOD Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MOD trades at $102.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs GNTX Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while GNTX trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs DORM Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while DORM trades at $127.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs QS Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while QS trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs BC-PB Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs BC-PA Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while BC-PA trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs GT Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while GT trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs VC Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while VC trades at $102.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs HSAI Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while HSAI trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2072.00. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs DAN Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while DAN trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs GTX Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while GTX trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs PHIN Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while PHIN trades at $47.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs ADNT Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while ADNT trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs FOXF Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while FOXF trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs XPEL Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while XPEL trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs THRM Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 945.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while THRM trades at $30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs SMP Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 731.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while SMP trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs ECX Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 721M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while ECX trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs PLOW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 715.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while PLOW trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs GTXAP Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MLR Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MLR trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs AXL Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 519.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while AXL trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MNRO Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 498.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MNRO trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -75.59. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs ALLG Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs CPS Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 424M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while CPS trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs SES Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while SES trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs INVZ Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while INVZ trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs STRT Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 279.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while STRT trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs HLLY Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while HLLY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs INVZW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs HYLN Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while HYLN trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MPAA Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MPAA trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -12.48. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs SRI Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while SRI trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs HLLY-WT Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs XL Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs LAZR Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while LAZR trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs CAAS Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while CAAS trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs KNDI Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while KNDI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs GGR Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while GGR trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs CVGI Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while CVGI trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs WPRT Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while WPRT trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs SYPR Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while SYPR trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MKDWW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MKDW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MKDW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs ECXWW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while ECXWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs NCNCW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs NCNC Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs LIDRW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs LIDR Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while LIDR trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs AMV Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs WKSP Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while WKSP trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs INEO Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while INEO trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs SAG Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs FRSX Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while FRSX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs SUP Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs GGROW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs CREV Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while CREV trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs UFAB Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs WKSPW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs CREVW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 139.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs HYZNW Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs VNE Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs RMO Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs HZN Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.
AEVA vs MTOR Comparison
AEVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEVA is priced at $30.88, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVA currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, AEVA's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVA is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVA.