Able Energy, Inc.
Able Energy, Inc. (ABLE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABLE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABLE | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 3K | -0.00 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| JXHLY | $9.85 | -3.48% | 14.4B | 213.50 | $0.05 | +2.42% |
| JXHGF | $5.27 | +0.00% | 14.2B | 175.73 | $0.03 | +3.09% |
| NTOIY | $8.32 | +6.14% | 12.6B | -58.46 | -$0.14 | +5.36% |
| NTOIF | $16.08 | +2.62% | 12.4B | -57.43 | -$0.28 | +5.50% |
| KLYCY | $10.07 | +0.00% | 8.7B | 10.49 | $0.96 | +4.28% |
| KUNUF | $0.99 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 9.90 | $0.10 | +4.38% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOF | $6.35 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 11.98 | $0.53 | +0.03% |
| IDKOY | $12.30 | -6.39% | 7.5B | 11.83 | $1.04 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
ABLE vs JXHLY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while JXHLY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 213.50. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check JXHLY's competition here
ABLE vs JXHGF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while JXHGF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 175.73. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check JXHGF's competition here
ABLE vs NTOIY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while NTOIY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -58.46. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check NTOIY's competition here
ABLE vs NTOIF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while NTOIF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -57.43. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check NTOIF's competition here
ABLE vs KLYCY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while KLYCY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check KLYCY's competition here
ABLE vs KUNUF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while KUNUF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check KUNUF's competition here
ABLE vs SAAFY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check SAAFY's competition here
ABLE vs IDKOF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while IDKOF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check IDKOF's competition here
ABLE vs IDKOY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while IDKOY trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check IDKOY's competition here
ABLE vs DCCPY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while DCCPY trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check DCCPY's competition here
ABLE vs DCCPF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while DCCPF trades at $62.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check DCCPF's competition here
ABLE vs MOHCY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check MOHCY's competition here
ABLE vs PKIUF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while PKIUF trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check PKIUF's competition here
ABLE vs PNADF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to PNADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check PNADF's competition here
ABLE vs SHIIY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check SHIIY's competition here
ABLE vs CTXAY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while CTXAY trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check CTXAY's competition here
ABLE vs CTXAF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check CTXAF's competition here
ABLE vs RBSFY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while RBSFY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check RBSFY's competition here
ABLE vs RUBSF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while RUBSF trades at $32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check RUBSF's competition here
ABLE vs MOHCF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check MOHCF's competition here
ABLE vs TOIPF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check TOIPF's competition here
ABLE vs TOIPY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check TOIPY's competition here
ABLE vs PKCPY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check PKCPY's competition here
ABLE vs FJLLF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check FJLLF's competition here
ABLE vs OILRF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while OILRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check OILRF's competition here
ABLE vs TPHIF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to TPHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check TPHIF's competition here
ABLE vs IRPSY Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 510.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while IRPSY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check IRPSY's competition here
ABLE vs CAOLF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to CAOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check CAOLF's competition here
ABLE vs NZRFF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while NZRFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check NZRFF's competition here
ABLE vs FGPRB Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while FGPRB trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check FGPRB's competition here
ABLE vs REGX Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to REGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check REGX's competition here
ABLE vs CLSZF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while CLSZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check CLSZF's competition here
ABLE vs FGPR Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while FGPR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to FGPR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check FGPR's competition here
ABLE vs BDCO Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while BDCO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check BDCO's competition here
ABLE vs ISRJF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check ISRJF's competition here
ABLE vs QREE Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check QREE's competition here
ABLE vs LCNTU Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check LCNTU's competition here
ABLE vs SRNW Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while SRNW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check SRNW's competition here
ABLE vs WTLC Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to WTLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check WTLC's competition here
ABLE vs BERI Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 146.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while BERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check BERI's competition here
ABLE vs DVFI Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to DVFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check DVFI's competition here
ABLE vs IAHL Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to IAHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check IAHL's competition here
ABLE vs LNKE Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to LNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check LNKE's competition here
ABLE vs TOAOF Comparison August 2025
ABLE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLE stands at 3K. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLE is priced at $0.00, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, ABLE's ROE is N/A, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLE is more volatile compared to TOAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLE.Check TOAOF's competition here