Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Ltd.
Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Ltd. (ABLBL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABLBL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABLBL.NS | ₹97.42 | -3.64% | 118.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TRENT.BO | ₹3,490.40 | -1.18% | 1.2T | 75.63 | ₹46.15 | +0.14% |
| TRENT.NS | ₹3,487.80 | -1.30% | 1.2T | 75.71 | ₹46.07 | +0.14% |
| METROBRAND.BO | ₹930.70 | -2.09% | 253.6B | 65.27 | ₹14.26 | +0.59% |
| MANYAVAR.NS | ₹342.40 | -2.99% | 83.2B | 22.98 | ₹14.90 | +2.34% |
| V2RETAIL.NS | ₹1,927.90 | -3.08% | 70.3B | 44.88 | ₹42.96 | N/A |
| V2RETAIL.BO | ₹1,925.40 | -3.08% | 70.2B | 44.87 | ₹42.91 | N/A |
| STYLEBAAZA.NS | ₹245.65 | -8.53% | 18.3B | 27.82 | ₹8.83 | N/A |
| KALAMANDIR.BO | ₹100.85 | +1.20% | 14.9B | 12.19 | ₹8.27 | +1.00% |
| KALAMANDIR.NS | ₹100.34 | +1.16% | 14.8B | 12.13 | ₹8.27 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
ABLBL.NS vs TRENT.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, TRENT.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while TRENT.BO trades at ₹3,490.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRENT.BO's P/E ratio is 75.63. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRENT.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check TRENT.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs TRENT.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, TRENT.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while TRENT.NS trades at ₹3,487.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRENT.NS's P/E ratio is 75.71. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRENT.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check TRENT.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs METROBRAND.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, METROBRAND.BO has a market cap of 253.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while METROBRAND.BO trades at ₹930.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METROBRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to METROBRAND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check METROBRAND.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MANYAVAR.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.NS has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while MANYAVAR.NS trades at ₹342.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANYAVAR.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANYAVAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MANYAVAR.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs V2RETAIL.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.NS has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while V2RETAIL.NS trades at ₹1,927.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V2RETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.88. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to V2RETAIL.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to V2RETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs V2RETAIL.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.BO has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while V2RETAIL.BO trades at ₹1,925.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V2RETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to V2RETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs STYLEBAAZA.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, STYLEBAAZA.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while STYLEBAAZA.NS trades at ₹245.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STYLEBAAZA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check STYLEBAAZA.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while KALAMANDIR.BO trades at ₹100.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KALAMANDIR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KALAMANDIR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while KALAMANDIR.NS trades at ₹100.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KALAMANDIR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KALAMANDIR.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs GOCOLORS.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while GOCOLORS.BO trades at ₹265.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOCOLORS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOCOLORS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check GOCOLORS.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MUFTI.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, MUFTI.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while MUFTI.NS trades at ₹78.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUFTI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUFTI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MUFTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MUFTI.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs SSDL.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, SSDL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while SSDL.NS trades at ₹57.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSDL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSDL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to SSDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check SSDL.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs GTNTEX.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, GTNTEX.NS has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while GTNTEX.NS trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to GTNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check GTNTEX.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs HEADSUP.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, HEADSUP.NS has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while HEADSUP.NS trades at ₹6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEADSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HEADSUP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check HEADSUP.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs HEADSUP.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, HEADSUP.BO has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while HEADSUP.BO trades at ₹6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEADSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HEADSUP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check HEADSUP.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs SUULD.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, SUULD.NS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while SUULD.NS trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUULD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUULD.NS's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to SUULD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check SUULD.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MAFIA.BO Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, MAFIA.BO has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while MAFIA.BO trades at ₹6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MAFIA.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs TMRVL.NS Comparison March 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 118.5B. In comparison, TMRVL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹97.42, while TMRVL.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMRVL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMRVL.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to TMRVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check TMRVL.NS's competition here