Ferrari N.V.
Ferrari N.V. (2FE.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2FE.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2FE.DE | €444.40 | +1.05% | 78.6B | 49.95 | €8.83 | +0.68% |
| TL0.DE | €275.50 | +7.20% | 876B | 188.61 | €1.44 | N/A |
| TOM.SG | €16.10 | -1.82% | 207.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.49% |
| TOM.DU | €16.01 | -1.59% | 207.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.52% |
| TOM.F | €16.23 | +0.32% | 206.7B | 7.58 | €2.09 | +1.57% |
| BY6.F | €14.03 | -2.30% | 107.9B | 7.76 | €1.83 | +1.10% |
| MBG.DE | €54.54 | +0.85% | 53.4B | 6.12 | €9.07 | +7.75% |
| BMW3.DE | €79.50 | -0.19% | 51.7B | 7.72 | €10.58 | +4.83% |
| VOW.DE | €100.70 | +1.10% | 49.2B | 5.52 | €18.56 | +6.34% |
| VOW3.DE | €98.18 | +2.29% | 49.2B | 5.41 | €18.56 | +6.34% |
Stock Comparison
2FE.DE vs TL0.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 876B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while TL0.DE trades at €275.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 188.61. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check TL0.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs TOM.SG Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 207.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while TOM.SG trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check TOM.SG's competition here
2FE.DE vs TOM.DU Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 207.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while TOM.DU trades at €16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check TOM.DU's competition here
2FE.DE vs TOM.F Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 206.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while TOM.F trades at €16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check TOM.F's competition here
2FE.DE vs BY6.F Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while BY6.F trades at €14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check BY6.F's competition here
2FE.DE vs MBG.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while MBG.DE trades at €54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check MBG.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs BMW3.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while BMW3.DE trades at €79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs VOW.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while VOW.DE trades at €100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check VOW.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs VOW3.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while VOW3.DE trades at €98.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs BMW.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while BMW.DE trades at €86.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check BMW.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs 8GM.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while 8GM.DE trades at €45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check 8GM.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs P911.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while P911.DE trades at €44.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check P911.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs P911.HM Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while P911.HM trades at €45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check P911.HM's competition here
2FE.DE vs FMC1.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while FMC1.DE trades at €9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs 8TI.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while 8TI.DE trades at €8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs PAH3.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while PAH3.DE trades at €36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check PAH3.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs RNL.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while RNL.DE trades at €34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check RNL.DE's competition here
2FE.DE vs N3IA.F Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while N3IA.F trades at €4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check N3IA.F's competition here
2FE.DE vs 0O9.F Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while 0O9.F trades at €3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check 0O9.F's competition here
2FE.DE vs PMAG.DE Comparison July 2025
2FE.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2FE.DE stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2FE.DE is priced at €444.40, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2FE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 49.95, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2FE.DE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 2FE.DE is less volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2FE.DE.Check PMAG.DE's competition here