Jiangxi Bank Co., Ltd.
Jiangxi Bank Co., Ltd. (1916.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1916.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1916.HK | HK$0.71 | +2.90% | 4.2B | 6.36 | HK$0.11 | +5.95% |
| 3968.HK | HK$49.62 | -1.55% | 1.3T | 7.69 | HK$6.55 | +6.57% |
| 1658.HK | HK$5.22 | -1.51% | 581.3B | 6.26 | HK$0.84 | +4.91% |
| 2388.HK | HK$43.78 | -1.00% | 462B | 11.53 | HK$3.79 | +5.24% |
| 0998.HK | HK$8.20 | -1.68% | 460.2B | 5.99 | HK$1.38 | +4.77% |
| 0011.HK | HK$154.30 | +0.00% | 289B | 20.25 | HK$7.62 | +2.53% |
| 6818.HK | HK$3.17 | +0.96% | 196.9B | 4.72 | HK$0.67 | +6.64% |
| 1988.HK | HK$3.68 | -0.27% | 162.4B | 5.15 | HK$0.72 | +5.85% |
| 2016.HK | HK$2.45 | -0.81% | 81.2B | 4.15 | HK$0.59 | +6.95% |
| 3618.HK | HK$7.00 | -2.64% | 80.6B | 5.87 | HK$1.21 | +4.84% |
Stock Comparison
1916.HK vs 3968.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3968.HK has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 3968.HK trades at HK$49.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 3968.HK's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3968.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 3968.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3968.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1658.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1658.HK has a market cap of 581.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1658.HK trades at HK$5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1658.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1658.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1658.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2388.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2388.HK has a market cap of 462B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 2388.HK trades at HK$43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 2388.HK's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2388.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2388.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2388.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0998.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 0998.HK has a market cap of 460.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 0998.HK trades at HK$8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 0998.HK's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0998.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0998.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0998.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0011.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 0011.HK has a market cap of 289B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 0011.HK trades at HK$154.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 0011.HK's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0011.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0011.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6818.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6818.HK has a market cap of 196.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 6818.HK trades at HK$3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 6818.HK's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6818.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6818.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6818.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1988.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1988.HK has a market cap of 162.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1988.HK trades at HK$3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1988.HK's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1988.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1988.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2016.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2016.HK has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 2016.HK trades at HK$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 2016.HK's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2016.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2016.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2016.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3618.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3618.HK has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 3618.HK trades at HK$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 3618.HK's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 3618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3618.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3698.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3698.HK has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 3698.HK trades at HK$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 3698.HK's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3698.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 3698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3698.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1963.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1963.HK has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1963.HK trades at HK$8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1963.HK's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1963.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1963.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1963.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0023.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 0023.HK has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 0023.HK trades at HK$13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 0023.HK's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0023.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0023.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3866.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3866.HK has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 3866.HK trades at HK$4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 3866.HK's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3866.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 3866.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3866.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9889.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9889.HK has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 9889.HK trades at HK$3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 9889.HK's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9889.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 9889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9889.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1551.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1551.HK has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1551.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1551.HK's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1551.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1551.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1551.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0416.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 0416.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 0416.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 0416.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0416.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0416.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0416.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2356.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2356.HK has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 2356.HK trades at HK$12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 2356.HK's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2356.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2356.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2356.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9677.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9677.HK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 9677.HK trades at HK$2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 9677.HK's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9677.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 9677.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9677.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6199.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6199.HK has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 6199.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 6199.HK's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6199.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6199.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6199.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1578.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1578.HK has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1578.HK trades at HK$2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1578.HK's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1578.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1578.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1578.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9668.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9668.HK has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 9668.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 9668.HK's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9668.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 9668.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9668.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2066.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2066.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 2066.HK trades at HK$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 2066.HK's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2066.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2066.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6196.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6196.HK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 6196.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 6196.HK's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6196.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6196.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6196.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0440.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 0440.HK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 0440.HK trades at HK$41.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 0440.HK's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0440.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0440.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0440.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1216.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1216.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1216.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1216.HK's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1216.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1216.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1216.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2558.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2558.HK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 2558.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 2558.HK's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2558.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2558.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2558.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1983.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1983.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1983.HK trades at HK$2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1983.HK's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1983.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1983.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1983.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6190.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6190.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 6190.HK trades at HK$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 6190.HK's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6190.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6190.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6190.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2139.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2139.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 2139.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 2139.HK's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2139.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2139.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2139.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6138.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6138.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 6138.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 6138.HK's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6138.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 6138.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6138.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6122.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6122.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 6122.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 6122.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6122.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 6122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6122.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0626.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 0626.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 0626.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 0626.HK's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0626.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0626.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0626.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison April 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.71, while 1111.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1111.HK's competition here