Jiangxi Bank Co., Ltd. (1916.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1916.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1916.HK | HK$0.63 | -1.56% | 3.9B | 5.33 | HK$0.12 | +6.50% |
| 3968.HK | HK$48.42 | -2.97% | 1.3T | 7.52 | HK$6.60 | +6.67% |
| 1658.HK | HK$5.04 | -2.51% | 624.5B | 6.19 | HK$0.84 | +4.97% |
| 2388.HK | HK$48.10 | -1.11% | 517.4B | 12.91 | HK$3.79 | +1.78% |
| 0998.HK | HK$7.50 | -2.98% | 425.7B | 5.50 | HK$1.39 | +5.59% |
| 0011.HK | HK$154.30 | +0.00% | 289B | 20.25 | HK$7.62 | +1.69% |
| 6818.HK | HK$3.34 | -2.62% | 200.3B | 5.22 | HK$0.65 | +6.19% |
| 1988.HK | HK$3.50 | -2.51% | 156.7B | 5.19 | HK$0.69 | +6.07% |
| 2016.HK | HK$2.34 | -4.49% | 79.8B | 4.73 | HK$0.51 | +6.25% |
| 3618.HK | HK$6.40 | -3.32% | 74.6B | 5.43 | HK$1.21 | +5.49% |
Stock Comparison
1916.HK vs 3968.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3968.HK has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 3968.HK trades at HK$48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 3968.HK's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3968.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 3968.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3968.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1658.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1658.HK has a market cap of 624.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1658.HK trades at HK$5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1658.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1658.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1658.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2388.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2388.HK has a market cap of 517.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 2388.HK trades at HK$48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 2388.HK's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2388.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2388.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2388.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0998.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0998.HK has a market cap of 425.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 0998.HK trades at HK$7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 0998.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0998.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 0998.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0998.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0011.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0011.HK has a market cap of 289B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 0011.HK trades at HK$154.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 0011.HK's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0011.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0011.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6818.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6818.HK has a market cap of 200.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 6818.HK trades at HK$3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 6818.HK's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6818.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 6818.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6818.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1988.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1988.HK has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1988.HK trades at HK$3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1988.HK's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1988.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1988.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1988.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2016.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2016.HK has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 2016.HK trades at HK$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 2016.HK's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2016.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2016.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2016.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3618.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3618.HK has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 3618.HK trades at HK$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 3618.HK's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 3618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3618.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3698.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3698.HK has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 3698.HK trades at HK$4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 3698.HK's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3698.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 3698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3698.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1963.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1963.HK has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1963.HK trades at HK$8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1963.HK's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1963.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1963.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1963.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0023.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0023.HK has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 0023.HK trades at HK$13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 0023.HK's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0023.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 0023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0023.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3866.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3866.HK has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 3866.HK trades at HK$4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 3866.HK's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3866.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 3866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3866.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9889.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9889.HK has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 9889.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 9889.HK's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9889.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 9889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9889.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1551.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1551.HK has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1551.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1551.HK's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1551.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1551.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1551.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0416.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0416.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 0416.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 0416.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0416.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0416.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0416.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2356.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2356.HK has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 2356.HK trades at HK$12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 2356.HK's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2356.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2356.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2356.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9677.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9677.HK has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 9677.HK trades at HK$2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 9677.HK's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9677.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 9677.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9677.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6199.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6199.HK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 6199.HK trades at HK$1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 6199.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6199.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6199.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6199.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2066.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2066.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 2066.HK trades at HK$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 2066.HK's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2066.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2066.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0440.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0440.HK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 0440.HK trades at HK$40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 0440.HK's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0440.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 0440.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0440.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1578.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1578.HK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1578.HK trades at HK$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1578.HK's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1578.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1578.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1578.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6196.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6196.HK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 6196.HK trades at HK$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 6196.HK's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6196.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 6196.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6196.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9668.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9668.HK has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 9668.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 9668.HK's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9668.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 9668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9668.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1216.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1216.HK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1216.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1216.HK's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1216.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1216.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1216.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2558.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2558.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 2558.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 2558.HK's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2558.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2558.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2558.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6190.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6190.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 6190.HK trades at HK$2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 6190.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6190.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6190.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6190.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1983.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1983.HK has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1983.HK trades at HK$2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1983.HK's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1983.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1983.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1983.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2139.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2139.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 2139.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 2139.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2139.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2139.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2139.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6138.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6138.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 6138.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 6138.HK's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6138.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK and 6138.HK have similar daily volatility (1.60).Check 6138.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6122.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6122.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 6122.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 6122.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6122.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 6122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6122.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0626.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0626.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 0626.HK trades at HK$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 0626.HK's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0626.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 0626.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0626.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison June 2026
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.63, while 1111.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1111.HK's competition here