China Zheshang Bank Co., Ltd
China Zheshang Bank Co., Ltd (2016.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2016.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016.HK | HK$2.40 | +0.00% | 79.5B | 4.71 | HK$0.51 | +7.10% |
| 3968.HK | HK$46.26 | +0.26% | 1.2T | 7.05 | HK$6.56 | +7.15% |
| 1658.HK | HK$5.04 | +0.20% | 605.3B | 6.00 | HK$0.84 | +5.12% |
| 2388.HK | HK$48.16 | +1.95% | 509.2B | 12.71 | HK$3.79 | +4.75% |
| 0998.HK | HK$7.61 | -1.17% | 423.5B | 5.51 | HK$1.38 | +5.61% |
| 0011.HK | HK$154.30 | +0.00% | 289B | 20.25 | HK$7.62 | +1.69% |
| 6818.HK | HK$3.02 | -0.33% | 178.4B | 4.72 | HK$0.64 | +6.95% |
| 1988.HK | HK$3.46 | +0.29% | 151.5B | 5.01 | HK$0.69 | +6.28% |
| 3618.HK | HK$6.70 | -1.18% | 76.1B | 5.54 | HK$1.21 | +5.13% |
| 3698.HK | HK$5.02 | -0.40% | 69.7B | 4.02 | HK$1.25 | +4.58% |
Stock Comparison
2016.HK vs 3968.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 3968.HK has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 3968.HK trades at HK$46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 3968.HK's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3968.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 3968.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 3968.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1658.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1658.HK has a market cap of 605.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1658.HK trades at HK$5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1658.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1658.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1658.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 2388.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 2388.HK has a market cap of 509.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 2388.HK trades at HK$48.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 2388.HK's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2388.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 2388.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 2388.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 0998.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 0998.HK has a market cap of 423.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 0998.HK trades at HK$7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 0998.HK's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0998.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 0998.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 0998.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 0011.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 0011.HK has a market cap of 289B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 0011.HK trades at HK$154.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 0011.HK's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0011.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 0011.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 6818.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 6818.HK has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 6818.HK trades at HK$3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 6818.HK's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6818.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 6818.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 6818.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1988.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1988.HK has a market cap of 151.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1988.HK trades at HK$3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1988.HK's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1988.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1988.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 3618.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 3618.HK has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 3618.HK trades at HK$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 3618.HK's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 3618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 3618.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 3698.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 3698.HK has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 3698.HK trades at HK$5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 3698.HK's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3698.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 3698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 3698.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 0023.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 0023.HK has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 0023.HK trades at HK$14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 0023.HK's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0023.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 0023.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1963.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1963.HK has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1963.HK trades at HK$8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1963.HK's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1963.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1963.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1963.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 3866.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 3866.HK has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 3866.HK trades at HK$4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 3866.HK's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3866.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 3866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 3866.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 9889.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 9889.HK has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 9889.HK trades at HK$3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 9889.HK's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9889.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 9889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 9889.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1551.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1551.HK has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1551.HK trades at HK$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1551.HK's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1551.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1551.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1551.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 0416.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 0416.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 0416.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 0416.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0416.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0416.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 0416.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 2356.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 2356.HK has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 2356.HK trades at HK$13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 2356.HK's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2356.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 2356.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 2356.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 9677.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 9677.HK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 9677.HK trades at HK$2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 9677.HK's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9677.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 9677.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 9677.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 6199.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 6199.HK has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 6199.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 6199.HK's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6199.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 6199.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 6199.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 9668.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 9668.HK has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 9668.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 9668.HK's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9668.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 9668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 9668.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 2066.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 2066.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 2066.HK trades at HK$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 2066.HK's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2066.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 2066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 2066.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1578.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1578.HK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1578.HK trades at HK$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1578.HK's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1578.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1578.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1578.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 6196.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 6196.HK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 6196.HK trades at HK$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 6196.HK's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6196.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6196.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 6196.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 0440.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 0440.HK has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 0440.HK trades at HK$42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 0440.HK's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0440.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 0440.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 0440.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1216.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1216.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1216.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1216.HK's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1216.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1216.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1216.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 2558.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 2558.HK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 2558.HK trades at HK$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 2558.HK's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2558.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 2558.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 2558.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1983.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1983.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1983.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1983.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1983.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1983.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1983.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 6190.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 6190.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 6190.HK trades at HK$2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 6190.HK's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6190.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6190.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 6190.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 2139.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 2139.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 2139.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 2139.HK's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2139.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 2139.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 2139.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1916.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1916.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1916.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1916.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1916.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1916.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1916.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 6138.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 6138.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 6138.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 6138.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6138.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 6138.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 6138.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 6122.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 6122.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 6122.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 6122.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6122.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 6122.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 0626.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 0626.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 0626.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 0626.HK's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0626.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0626.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 0626.HK's competition here
2016.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison May 2026
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 79.5B. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$2.40, while 1111.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.Check 1111.HK's competition here