Jiangxi Bank Co., Ltd.
Jiangxi Bank Co., Ltd. (1916.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1916.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1916.HK | HK$0.76 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 5.69 | HK$0.13 | +5.63% |
| 3968.HK | HK$50.10 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 7.94 | HK$6.15 | +4.48% |
| 1658.HK | HK$5.78 | +0.00% | 554.3B | 6.43 | HK$0.87 | +5.08% |
| 0998.HK | HK$7.40 | +0.00% | 470.5B | 5.64 | HK$1.29 | +5.34% |
| 2388.HK | HK$36.42 | +0.00% | 382.3B | 9.99 | HK$3.62 | +5.50% |
| 6818.HK | HK$3.75 | +0.00% | 248.6B | 5.35 | HK$0.69 | +5.57% |
| 1988.HK | HK$4.72 | +0.00% | 220.4B | 6.69 | HK$0.68 | +4.62% |
| 0011.HK | HK$113.70 | +0.00% | 213.4B | 14.86 | HK$7.63 | +6.17% |
| 2016.HK | HK$2.79 | +0.00% | 94.9B | 4.88 | HK$0.57 | +6.13% |
| 3618.HK | HK$6.14 | +0.00% | 79.8B | 5.70 | HK$1.08 | +5.36% |
Stock Comparison
1916.HK vs 3968.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 3968.HK has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 3968.HK trades at HK$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 3968.HK's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3968.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 3968.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3968.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1658.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1658.HK has a market cap of 554.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1658.HK trades at HK$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1658.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1658.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1658.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0998.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 0998.HK has a market cap of 470.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0998.HK trades at HK$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 0998.HK's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0998.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0998.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0998.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2388.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 2388.HK has a market cap of 382.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2388.HK trades at HK$36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 2388.HK's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2388.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2388.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2388.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6818.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 6818.HK has a market cap of 248.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6818.HK trades at HK$3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 6818.HK's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6818.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6818.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6818.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1988.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1988.HK has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1988.HK trades at HK$4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1988.HK's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1988.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1988.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0011.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 0011.HK has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0011.HK trades at HK$113.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 0011.HK's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0011.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0011.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2016.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 2016.HK has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2016.HK trades at HK$2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 2016.HK's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2016.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2016.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2016.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3618.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 3618.HK has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 3618.HK trades at HK$6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 3618.HK's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 3618.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3618.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3698.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 3698.HK has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 3698.HK trades at HK$3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 3698.HK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3698.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 3698.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3698.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0023.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 0023.HK has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0023.HK trades at HK$12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 0023.HK's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0023.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0023.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1963.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1963.HK has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1963.HK trades at HK$7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1963.HK's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1963.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1963.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1963.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 3866.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 3866.HK has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 3866.HK trades at HK$4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 3866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3866.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 3866.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 3866.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9889.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 9889.HK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 9889.HK trades at HK$3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 9889.HK's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9889.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 9889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9889.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1551.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1551.HK has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1551.HK trades at HK$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1551.HK's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1551.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1551.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1551.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0416.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 0416.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0416.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 0416.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0416.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0416.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0416.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9668.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 9668.HK has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 9668.HK trades at HK$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 9668.HK's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9668.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 9668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9668.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6196.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 6196.HK has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6196.HK trades at HK$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 6196.HK's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6196.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6196.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6196.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 9677.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 9677.HK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 9677.HK trades at HK$3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 9677.HK's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9677.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 9677.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 9677.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6199.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 6199.HK has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6199.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 6199.HK's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6199.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6199.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6199.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1578.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1578.HK has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1578.HK trades at HK$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1578.HK's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1578.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1578.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1578.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2356.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 2356.HK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2356.HK trades at HK$9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 2356.HK's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2356.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2356.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2356.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1216.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1216.HK has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1216.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1216.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1216.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1216.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1216.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2066.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 2066.HK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2066.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 2066.HK's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2066.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 2066.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2066.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6190.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 6190.HK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6190.HK trades at HK$3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 6190.HK's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6190.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6190.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6190.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0440.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 0440.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0440.HK trades at HK$30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 0440.HK's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0440.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0440.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0440.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2558.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 2558.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2558.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 2558.HK's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2558.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2558.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2558.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1983.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1983.HK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1983.HK trades at HK$2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1983.HK's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1983.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 1983.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1983.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6138.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 6138.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6138.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 6138.HK's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6138.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 6138.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6138.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 2139.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 2139.HK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2139.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 2139.HK's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2139.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 2139.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 2139.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 6122.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 6122.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6122.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 6122.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6122.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is less volatile compared to 6122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 6122.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 0626.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 0626.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0626.HK trades at HK$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 0626.HK's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0626.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 0626.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 0626.HK's competition here
1916.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison August 2025
1916.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1916.HK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1916.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1111.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1916.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.69, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, 1916.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1916.HK is more volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1916.HK.Check 1111.HK's competition here