Niu Technologies

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 918.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while TL0.DE trades at €284.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 199.06. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TL0.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while TOM.SG trades at €16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.SG's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 213.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while TOM.DU trades at €16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.DU's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 212.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while TOM.F trades at €16.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.F's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while BY6.F trades at €12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check BY6.F's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while 2FE.DE trades at €397.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check 2FE.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while BMW.DE trades at €88.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check BMW.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while MBG.DE trades at €53.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check MBG.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while BMW3.DE trades at €81.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check BMW3.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while VOW.DE trades at €101.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check VOW.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while VOW3.DE trades at €98.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check VOW3.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while 8GM.DE trades at €47.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check 8GM.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while P911.HM trades at €45.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check P911.HM's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while P911.DE trades at €45.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check P911.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while FMC1.DE trades at €9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check FMC1.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while 8TI.DE trades at €8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check 8TI.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while PAH3.DE trades at €36.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check PAH3.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while RNL.DE trades at €32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check RNL.DE's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while N3IA.F trades at €3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check N3IA.F's competition here

0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 299.7M. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €4.34, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -19.55, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check PMAG.DE's competition here