Niu Technologies
Niu Technologies (0O9.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0O9.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0O9.F | €3.24 | -3.28% | 229.3M | -82.25 | -€0.04 | N/A |
| TL0.DE | €345.70 | -0.39% | 1.3T | 375.76 | €0.92 | N/A |
| TOM.MU | €18.47 | -2.66% | 240.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.07% |
| TOM.SG | €18.34 | -2.08% | 239.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.07% |
| TOM.F | €18.35 | -1.45% | 239.4B | 11.85 | €1.55 | +3.00% |
| TOM.DU | €18.29 | -2.08% | 238.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.10% |
| BY6.F | €10.81 | +0.79% | 102B | 63.68 | €0.17 | +1.46% |
| 8GM.DE | €63.53 | -0.58% | 57.4B | 22.53 | €2.82 | +0.85% |
| MBG.DE | €54.85 | -0.72% | 52.5B | 8.46 | €6.48 | +7.84% |
| 2FE.DE | €289.60 | -0.99% | 51.3B | 32.36 | €8.95 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
0O9.F vs TL0.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while TL0.DE trades at €345.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 375.76. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TL0.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs TOM.MU Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, TOM.MU has a market cap of 240.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while TOM.MU trades at €18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas TOM.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOM.MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.MU's competition here
0O9.F vs TOM.SG Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 239.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while TOM.SG trades at €18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.SG's competition here
0O9.F vs TOM.F Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 239.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while TOM.F trades at €18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.F's competition here
0O9.F vs TOM.DU Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 238.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while TOM.DU trades at €18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check TOM.DU's competition here
0O9.F vs BY6.F Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while BY6.F trades at €10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 63.68. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check BY6.F's competition here
0O9.F vs 8GM.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while 8GM.DE trades at €63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check 8GM.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs MBG.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while MBG.DE trades at €54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check MBG.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs 2FE.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while 2FE.DE trades at €289.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check 2FE.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs BMW3.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while BMW3.DE trades at €81.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs BMW.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while BMW.DE trades at €81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check BMW.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs VOW3.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while VOW3.DE trades at €89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs VOW.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while VOW.DE trades at €90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check VOW.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs FMC1.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while FMC1.DE trades at €10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs P911.HM Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while P911.HM trades at €37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check P911.HM's competition here
0O9.F vs P911.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while P911.DE trades at €37.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check P911.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs 8TI.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while 8TI.DE trades at €5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs N3IA.F Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while N3IA.F trades at €5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -9.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check N3IA.F's competition here
0O9.F vs PAH3.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while PAH3.DE trades at €32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check PAH3.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs RNL.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while RNL.DE trades at €28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check RNL.DE's competition here
0O9.F vs PMAG.DE Comparison March 2026
0O9.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0O9.F stands at 229.3M. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0O9.F is priced at €3.24, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0O9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -82.25, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0O9.F's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of +4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0O9.F is more volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0O9.F.Check PMAG.DE's competition here