Swiss Bar Owner Faces New Fraud Charges in Crans-Montana Fire, June 06

Jessica Moretti, owner of the bar that burned in Crans-Montana on New Year’s Eve, faces a new criminal charge. Swiss police indicted her for document fraud on June 5. The charge centers on a questionable invoice related to the foam that caught fire and killed 41 people. Investigators want to know who bought the foam, when, and from whom.

What the New Charge Involves

Moretti was notified of the fraud charge on Friday, June 5, during questioning by prosecutors. The charge is for “faux dans les titres,” which means falsification of documents. Police focus on an invoice directly connected to the foam that ignited in the bar’s basement. Romain Jordan, an attorney for victims’ families, confirmed the invoice concerns the foam’s source. The document raises critical questions about the material’s origin and purchase details.

Why Investigators Are Skeptical

Early findings showed that fountain candles sparked the foam insulation at the ceiling. The foam then burned rapidly, trapping people inside. Christophe de Galembert, another lawyer for victims’ families, said the invoice raises “very legitimate questions.” He criticized the investigation’s pace, saying authorities have not answered basic questions about who bought the foam, when it was purchased, or which supplier provided it. The Friday hearing took the form of a confrontation between prosecutors, the Morettis, and multiple victim representatives.

The Broader Investigation

The fire on January 1 killed 41 people and remains one of Switzerland’s deadliest incidents. Moretti and her husband were questioned by prosecutors as part of the ongoing probe. The new fraud charge adds to the legal pressure on the couple. Investigators continue to examine financial records and purchase documents tied to the bar’s operations and the materials used inside.

Final Thoughts

Moretti’s new fraud charge signals prosecutors believe she may have falsified records about the foam that caused the fire. The investigation now hinges on proving document tampering alongside the original fire inquiry.

FAQs

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.