BMO Equal Weight Global Base Metals Hedged to CAD Index ETF
BMO Equal Weight Global Base Metals Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZMT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMT.TO | CA$138.13 | +7.14% | 43.4M | N/A | N/A | +0.16% |
| TEC.TO | CA$58.12 | +3.14% | 4.7B | 36.31 | CA$1.58 | +0.12% |
| IGAF.TO | CA$17.38 | +1.70% | 3.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.16% |
| XGD.TO | CA$57.86 | +11.21% | 3.2B | 18.69 | CA$2.99 | +0.57% |
| TGED.TO | CA$32.79 | +3.05% | 1.7B | 34.08 | CA$0.96 | +3.40% |
| CIF.TO | CA$71.27 | -1.42% | 1.3B | 17.08 | CA$4.23 | +1.75% |
| DXG.TO | CA$85.58 | +0.93% | 898.8M | 38.96 | CA$2.24 | N/A |
| TQGD.TO | CA$24.05 | +1.01% | 684.8M | 16.16 | CA$1.49 | +2.82% |
| XDG.TO | CA$31.25 | -0.13% | 683.9M | 19.52 | CA$1.62 | +2.86% |
| FSF.TO | CA$34.58 | -0.12% | 566.2M | N/A | N/A | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
ZMT.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while TEC.TO trades at CA$58.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TEC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while IGAF.TO trades at CA$17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to IGAF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check IGAF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XGD.TO trades at CA$57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XGD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while TGED.TO trades at CA$32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TGED.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CIF.TO trades at CA$71.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CIF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 898.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while DXG.TO trades at CA$85.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DXG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 684.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while TQGD.TO trades at CA$24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TQGD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 683.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XDG.TO trades at CA$31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XDG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 566.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while FSF.TO trades at CA$34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FSF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 502.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XHC.TO trades at CA$65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XHC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 447.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CINF.TO trades at CA$34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CINF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 379.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while VMO.TO trades at CA$93.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VMO.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 358.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while ZGD.TO trades at CA$322.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZGD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at CA$12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check 0P0001ED1S.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CWW.TO trades at CA$65.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CWW.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while ZWG.TO trades at CA$34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZWG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CGR.TO trades at CA$33.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CGR.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs COW.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 251.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while COW.TO trades at CA$73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check COW.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while GDV.TO trades at CA$13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check GDV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CYH.TO trades at CA$26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CYH.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at CA$23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check 0P0001ODDT.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while LIFE.TO trades at CA$16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check LIFE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XDGH.TO trades at CA$30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XDGH.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XGI.TO trades at CA$71.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to XGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XGI.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while PMNT.TO trades at CA$18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to PMNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PMNT.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while TGRE.TO trades at CA$15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TGRE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CGLO.TO trades at CA$31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CGLO.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at CA$20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check 0P0001NDFE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while ONEQ.TO trades at CA$54.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ONEQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ONEQ.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XCD.TO trades at CA$58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XCD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while GIQG.TO trades at CA$35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to GIQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check GIQG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while ESGG.TO trades at CA$60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ESGG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while TGGR.TO trades at CA$32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TGGR.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while VVO.TO trades at CA$41.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VVO.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while HGGG.TO trades at CA$98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to HGGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HGGG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while DXN.TO trades at CA$26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DXN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at CA$52.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check 0P0001N8LS.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while PINV.TO trades at CA$33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to PINV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PINV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while MIVG.TO trades at CA$38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check MIVG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while VAH.TO trades at CA$28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VAH.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while XMY.TO trades at CA$33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XMY.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while CGAA.TO trades at CA$31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CGAA.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while RWU.TO trades at CA$20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to RWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check RWU.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while VLQ.TO trades at CA$32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to VLQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VLQ.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while FLGD.TO trades at CA$29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to FLGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FLGD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while RIG.TO trades at CA$18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to RIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check RIG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while HRA.TO trades at CA$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HRA.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while RLD.TO trades at CA$24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to RLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check RLD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while EATS.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -26.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check EATS.CN's competition here
ZMT.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while SHZ.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to SHZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check SHZ.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while DFD.TO trades at CA$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to DFD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DFD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while LONG.TO trades at CA$40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to LONG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check LONG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while HLTH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to HLTH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HLTH.CN's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while DFE.TO trades at CA$17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to DFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DFE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while RLE.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check RLE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while HGM.TO trades at CA$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to HGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HGM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 54K. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while SOL.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check SOL.CN's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PXG.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PXG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while PXG.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to PXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PXG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PSY.TO Comparison May 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PSY.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$138.13, while PSY.TO trades at CA$30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to PSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PSY.TO's competition here