BMO Equal Weight Global Base Metals Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZMT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMT.TO | CA$129.93 | +1.62% | 41.4M | N/A | N/A | +0.17% |
| BLK.NE | CA$24.50 | +0.95% | 195.6B | 22.96 | CA$1.07 | +2.29% |
| BN.TO | CA$60.51 | +1.10% | 135.2B | 29.78 | CA$2.03 | +0.59% |
| BAM.TO | CA$63.62 | +1.78% | 101.6B | 27.54 | CA$2.31 | +4.05% |
| VFV.TO | CA$188.37 | +0.55% | 33.6B | 27.55 | CA$6.84 | +0.84% |
| XIU.TO | CA$51.81 | +0.12% | 22.9B | 19.45 | CA$2.66 | +2.17% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$42.82 | -0.42% | 20.4B | 2.69 | CA$15.90 | N/A |
| IGM.TO | CA$79.18 | +3.13% | 18.4B | 16.56 | CA$4.78 | +2.98% |
| PSLV.TO | CA$26.77 | +1.71% | 17B | 1.42 | CA$18.87 | N/A |
| VEQT.TO | CA$61.36 | +0.41% | 14.8B | 21.88 | CA$2.80 | +1.24% |
Stock Comparison
ZMT.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 195.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BLK.NE trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
ZMT.TO vs BN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BN.TO trades at CA$60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BAM.TO trades at CA$63.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VFV.TO trades at CA$188.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XIU.TO trades at CA$51.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while IGM.TO trades at CA$79.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BNC.TO trades at CA$42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BNC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZAG.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZAG.TO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZAG.TO trades at CA$13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZAG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CEF.TO trades at CA$57.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$47.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FBAL.NE Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FBAL.NE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FBAL.NE trades at CA$15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBAL.NE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBAL.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FBAL.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FBAL.NE's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$106.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VAB.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VAB.TO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VAB.TO trades at CA$23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and VAB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.17).Check VAB.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PMEI-UN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PMEI-UN.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PMEI-UN.TO trades at CA$8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMEI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to PMEI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PMEI-UN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VSP.TO trades at CA$117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$61.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while TPE.TO trades at CA$30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while HXT.TO trades at CA$92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FGRO.NE Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FGRO.NE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FGRO.NE trades at CA$18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGRO.NE's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGRO.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FGRO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FGRO.NE's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XAW.TO trades at CA$58.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs SII.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while SII.TO trades at CA$159.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XGD.TO trades at CA$47.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XGD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CGL.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CGL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CGL.TO trades at CA$30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CGL.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check EIT-UN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$64.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XDV.TO trades at CA$47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$51.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs LUNR.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, LUNR.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while LUNR.TO trades at CA$18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUNR.TO's P/E ratio is -1898.00. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUNR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to LUNR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check LUNR.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FCNS.NE Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FCNS.NE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FCNS.NE trades at CA$12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNS.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNS.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FCNS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FCNS.NE's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CYB.TO trades at CA$91.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while NREA.TO trades at CA$29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check NREA.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while UNC.TO trades at CA$15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs GCG-A.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, GCG-A.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while GCG-A.TO trades at CA$67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCG-A.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCG-A.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to GCG-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check GCG-A.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XEG.TO trades at CA$23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs GCG.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, GCG.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while GCG.TO trades at CA$67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to GCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check GCG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VSB.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs BTCC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BTCC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BTCC.TO trades at CA$10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTCC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to BTCC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BTCC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs QQC-F.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, QQC-F.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while QQC-F.TO trades at CA$232.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQC-F.TO's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC-F.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to QQC-F.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check QQC-F.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZCM.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZCM.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZCM.TO trades at CA$15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZCM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check RIIN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PFIA.TO trades at CA$10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PFIA.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DFN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, DFN.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while DFN.TO trades at CA$8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFN.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to DFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DFN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs AGF-B.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, AGF-B.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while AGF-B.TO trades at CA$20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGF-B.TO's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGF-B.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to AGF-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check AGF-B.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs EVT.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while EVT.TO trades at CA$23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check EVT.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs QAH.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, QAH.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while QAH.TO trades at CA$241.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QAH.TO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to QAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check QAH.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PFLS.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PFLS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PFLS.TO trades at CA$23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFLS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFLS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and PFLS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.17).Check PFLS.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XRE.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XRE.TO trades at CA$17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XRE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZWH.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZWH.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZWH.TO trades at CA$26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZWH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZWH.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CGI.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CGI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CGI.TO trades at CA$52.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGI.TO's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGI.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CGI.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs WXM.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, WXM.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while WXM.TO trades at CA$51.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WXM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WXM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to WXM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check WXM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CVG.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CVG.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CVG.TO trades at CA$77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CVG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CVG.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs PDC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, PDC.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while PDC.TO trades at CA$49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDC.TO's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to PDC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check PDC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs WSRI.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, WSRI.TO has a market cap of 988.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while WSRI.TO trades at CA$50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRI.TO's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to WSRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check WSRI.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HCAL.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, HCAL.TO has a market cap of 976.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while HCAL.TO trades at CA$49.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HCAL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HCAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HCAL.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs SEC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, SEC.TO has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while SEC.TO trades at CA$401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEC.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to SEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check SEC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs WSRD.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, WSRD.TO has a market cap of 969.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while WSRD.TO trades at CA$34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to WSRD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check WSRD.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TQSM.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, TQSM.TO has a market cap of 967.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while TQSM.TO trades at CA$30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQSM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQSM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TQSM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TQSM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FTN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FTN.TO has a market cap of 916.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FTN.TO trades at CA$11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTN.TO's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTN.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FTN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FTN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZDY.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZDY.TO has a market cap of 904.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZDY.TO trades at CA$58.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZDY.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VCNS.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VCNS.TO has a market cap of 897.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VCNS.TO trades at CA$33.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCNS.TO's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCNS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VCNS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VCNS.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs LBS.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, LBS.TO has a market cap of 872.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while LBS.TO trades at CA$13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBS.TO's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBS.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to LBS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check LBS.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZDI.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZDI.TO has a market cap of 854.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZDI.TO trades at CA$32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZDI.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs TXF.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, TXF.TO has a market cap of 851M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while TXF.TO trades at CA$28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXF.TO's P/E ratio is 39.43. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TXF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check TXF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FCCV.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FCCV.TO has a market cap of 831.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FCCV.TO trades at CA$22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCCV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCCV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FCCV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FCCV.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs RQP.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, RQP.TO has a market cap of 818.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while RQP.TO trades at CA$18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to RQP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check RQP.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HYLD-U.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, HYLD-U.TO has a market cap of 816.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while HYLD-U.TO trades at CA$17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD-U.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD-U.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HYLD-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HYLD-U.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs QMAX.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, QMAX.TO has a market cap of 816.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while QMAX.TO trades at CA$27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to QMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check QMAX.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZMP.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZMP.TO has a market cap of 807.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZMP.TO trades at CA$14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to ZMP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZMP.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZEF.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZEF.TO has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZEF.TO trades at CA$12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to ZEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZEF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs VBU.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, VBU.TO has a market cap of 798.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while VBU.TO trades at CA$22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VBU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check VBU.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs 0P0000VGMF.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, 0P0000VGMF.TO has a market cap of 788.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while 0P0000VGMF.TO trades at CA$17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000VGMF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000VGMF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0000VGMF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check 0P0000VGMF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XLB.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XLB.TO has a market cap of 756.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XLB.TO trades at CA$18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XLB.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs BK-PA.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BK-PA.TO has a market cap of 748.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BK-PA.TO trades at CA$10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BK-PA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BK-PA.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to BK-PA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BK-PA.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs CLF.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, CLF.TO has a market cap of 742.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while CLF.TO trades at CA$17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to CLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check CLF.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HXDM.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, HXDM.TO has a market cap of 741.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while HXDM.TO trades at CA$66.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXDM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HXDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HXDM.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs BK.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, BK.TO has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while BK.TO trades at CA$16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BK.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to BK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check BK.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs XIT.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, XIT.TO has a market cap of 733.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while XIT.TO trades at CA$72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIT.TO's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XIT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check XIT.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FFN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FFN.TO has a market cap of 727.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FFN.TO trades at CA$11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFN.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to FFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FFN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs HULC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, HULC.TO has a market cap of 720.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while HULC.TO trades at CA$130.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HULC.TO's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HULC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HULC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check HULC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DHT-UN.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, DHT-UN.TO has a market cap of 695.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while DHT-UN.TO trades at CA$18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHT-UN.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to DHT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DHT-UN.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs FCCQ.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, FCCQ.TO has a market cap of 686.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while FCCQ.TO trades at CA$51.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCCQ.TO's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCCQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to FCCQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check FCCQ.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs QRC.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, QRC.TO has a market cap of 676.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while QRC.TO trades at CA$13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRC.TO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QRC.TO's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to QRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check QRC.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs DHT-U.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, DHT-U.TO has a market cap of 674.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while DHT-U.TO trades at CA$12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHT-U.TO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHT-U.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is more volatile compared to DHT-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check DHT-U.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs ZRE.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, ZRE.TO has a market cap of 623.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while ZRE.TO trades at CA$24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZRE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check ZRE.TO's competition here
ZMT.TO vs SPPP.TO Comparison July 2026
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 41.4M. In comparison, SPPP.TO has a market cap of 621.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at CA$129.93, while SPPP.TO trades at CA$17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPP.TO's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPP.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to SPPP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.Check SPPP.TO's competition here