Financial 15 Split Corp (FTN-PA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FTN-PA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTN-PA.TO | CA$10.74 | -0.09% | 930M | 2.80 | CA$3.84 | +10.25% |
| BLK.NE | CA$27.32 | -0.98% | 218.1B | 25.60 | CA$1.07 | +2.05% |
| BN.TO | CA$61.17 | -1.72% | 136.6B | 30.10 | CA$2.03 | +0.59% |
| BAM.TO | CA$67.71 | -2.72% | 108.1B | 29.31 | CA$2.31 | +3.83% |
| VFV.TO | CA$185.25 | -1.27% | 33.2B | 27.09 | CA$6.84 | +0.85% |
| XIU.TO | CA$52.83 | -0.28% | 23.9B | 19.84 | CA$2.66 | +2.14% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$42.48 | +0.76% | 20.2B | 2.67 | CA$15.90 | N/A |
| IGM.TO | CA$84.89 | -1.12% | 19.7B | 17.76 | CA$4.78 | +2.78% |
| PSLV.TO | CA$25.31 | +0.72% | 16.1B | 1.34 | CA$18.87 | N/A |
| VEQT.TO | CA$60.45 | -0.90% | 15.5B | 21.56 | CA$2.80 | +1.26% |
Stock Comparison
FTN-PA.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 218.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BLK.NE trades at CA$27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs BN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BN.TO trades at CA$61.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BAM.TO trades at CA$67.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VFV.TO trades at CA$185.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XIU.TO trades at CA$52.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while IGM.TO trades at CA$84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$60.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BNC.TO trades at CA$43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BNC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZAG.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZAG.TO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZAG.TO trades at CA$13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZAG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZAG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ZAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZAG.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$46.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CEF.TO trades at CA$55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FBAL.NE Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FBAL.NE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FBAL.NE trades at CA$15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FBAL.NE's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FBAL.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FBAL.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FBAL.NE's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$107.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VAB.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VAB.TO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VAB.TO trades at CA$22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VAB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to VAB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VAB.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PMEI-UN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PMEI-UN.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PMEI-UN.TO trades at CA$9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PMEI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PMEI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to PMEI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PMEI-UN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VSP.TO trades at CA$117.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while TPE.TO trades at CA$30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HXT.TO trades at CA$94.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FGRO.NE Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FGRO.NE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FGRO.NE trades at CA$18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FGRO.NE's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FGRO.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FGRO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FGRO.NE's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XAW.TO trades at CA$57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs SII.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while SII.TO trades at CA$145.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check EIT-UN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CGL.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CGL.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CGL.TO trades at CA$30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CGL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CGL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to CGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CGL.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XGD.TO trades at CA$44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XGD.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XDV.TO trades at CA$48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$73.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$63.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$53.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FCNS.NE Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FCNS.NE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FCNS.NE trades at CA$12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCNS.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCNS.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FCNS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FCNS.NE's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs LUNR.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, LUNR.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while LUNR.TO trades at CA$18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LUNR.TO's P/E ratio is -1818.00. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LUNR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to LUNR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check LUNR.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while NREA.TO trades at CA$29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check NREA.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CYB.TO trades at CA$88.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XEG.TO trades at CA$26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while UNC.TO trades at CA$14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs GCG-A.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, GCG-A.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while GCG-A.TO trades at CA$67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GCG-A.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GCG-A.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to GCG-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check GCG-A.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VSB.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs GCG.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, GCG.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while GCG.TO trades at CA$67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GCG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GCG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to GCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check GCG.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs BTCC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BTCC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BTCC.TO trades at CA$11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BTCC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BTCC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to BTCC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BTCC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check RIIN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZCM.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZCM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZCM.TO trades at CA$15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZCM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZCM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ZCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZCM.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs AGF-B.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, AGF-B.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while AGF-B.TO trades at CA$22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AGF-B.TO's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AGF-B.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to AGF-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check AGF-B.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs DFN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, DFN.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while DFN.TO trades at CA$9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DFN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DFN.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to DFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check DFN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs QQC-F.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, QQC-F.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while QQC-F.TO trades at CA$219.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QQC-F.TO's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QQC-F.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to QQC-F.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check QQC-F.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PFIA.TO trades at CA$10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PFIA.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs EVT.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while EVT.TO trades at CA$23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check EVT.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PFLS.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PFLS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PFLS.TO trades at CA$22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PFLS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PFLS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to PFLS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PFLS.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XRE.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XRE.TO trades at CA$17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XRE.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs QAH.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, QAH.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while QAH.TO trades at CA$240.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QAH.TO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to QAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check QAH.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZWH.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZWH.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZWH.TO trades at CA$26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZWH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZWH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ZWH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZWH.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HCAL.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HCAL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HCAL.TO trades at CA$51.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HCAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HCAL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to HCAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HCAL.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CGI.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CGI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CGI.TO trades at CA$51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CGI.TO's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CGI.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to CGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CGI.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs PDC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, PDC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while PDC.TO trades at CA$50.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PDC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PDC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to PDC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check PDC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CVG.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CVG.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CVG.TO trades at CA$77.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CVG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CVG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to CVG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CVG.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs WXM.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, WXM.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while WXM.TO trades at CA$49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WXM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WXM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to WXM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check WXM.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs WSRI.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, WSRI.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while WSRI.TO trades at CA$50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WSRI.TO's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WSRI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to WSRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check WSRI.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FTN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FTN.TO has a market cap of 987.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FTN.TO trades at CA$12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FTN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FTN.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FTN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FTN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs WSRD.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, WSRD.TO has a market cap of 969.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while WSRD.TO trades at CA$34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WSRD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WSRD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to WSRD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check WSRD.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs SEC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, SEC.TO has a market cap of 968.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while SEC.TO trades at CA$400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SEC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SEC.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to SEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check SEC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs TQSM.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, TQSM.TO has a market cap of 964.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while TQSM.TO trades at CA$29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TQSM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TQSM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to TQSM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check TQSM.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VCNS.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VCNS.TO has a market cap of 928.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VCNS.TO trades at CA$32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VCNS.TO's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VCNS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to VCNS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VCNS.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs LBS.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, LBS.TO has a market cap of 909.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while LBS.TO trades at CA$13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LBS.TO's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LBS.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to LBS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check LBS.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HISU-U.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HISU-U.TO has a market cap of 896.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HISU-U.TO trades at CA$100.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HISU-U.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HISU-U.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to HISU-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HISU-U.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZDY.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZDY.TO has a market cap of 882M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZDY.TO trades at CA$57.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZDY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ZDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZDY.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZDI.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZDI.TO has a market cap of 871.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZDI.TO trades at CA$32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ZDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZDI.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FCCV.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FCCV.TO has a market cap of 838.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FCCV.TO trades at CA$23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCCV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCCV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FCCV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FCCV.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs RQP.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, RQP.TO has a market cap of 833.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while RQP.TO trades at CA$18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RQP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RQP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to RQP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check RQP.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZMP.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZMP.TO has a market cap of 815.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZMP.TO trades at CA$14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZMP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZMP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ZMP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZMP.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZEF.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZEF.TO has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZEF.TO trades at CA$12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZEF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ZEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZEF.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs BK-PA.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BK-PA.TO has a market cap of 801.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BK-PA.TO trades at CA$10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BK-PA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BK-PA.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to BK-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BK-PA.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs BK.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, BK.TO has a market cap of 800.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while BK.TO trades at CA$17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BK.TO's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BK.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to BK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check BK.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs VBU.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, VBU.TO has a market cap of 798.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while VBU.TO trades at CA$22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VBU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VBU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to VBU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check VBU.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HYLD-U.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HYLD-U.TO has a market cap of 793M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HYLD-U.TO trades at CA$16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HYLD-U.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HYLD-U.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to HYLD-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HYLD-U.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs 0P0000VGMF.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, 0P0000VGMF.TO has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while 0P0000VGMF.TO trades at CA$17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas 0P0000VGMF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0P0000VGMF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0000VGMF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check 0P0000VGMF.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs TXF.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, TXF.TO has a market cap of 769.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while TXF.TO trades at CA$25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TXF.TO's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to TXF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check TXF.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FFN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FFN.TO has a market cap of 764.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FFN.TO trades at CA$10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FFN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FFN.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to FFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FFN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HULC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HULC.TO has a market cap of 760M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HULC.TO trades at CA$128.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HULC.TO's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HULC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to HULC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HULC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs CLF.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, CLF.TO has a market cap of 754M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while CLF.TO trades at CA$17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CLF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to CLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check CLF.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs QRC.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, QRC.TO has a market cap of 742M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while QRC.TO trades at CA$13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QRC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QRC.TO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to QRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check QRC.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs QMAX.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, QMAX.TO has a market cap of 735.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while QMAX.TO trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to QMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check QMAX.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs HXDM.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, HXDM.TO has a market cap of 732.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while HXDM.TO trades at CA$65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HXDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HXDM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to HXDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check HXDM.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XLB.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XLB.TO has a market cap of 726.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XLB.TO trades at CA$18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XLB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XLB.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs XIT.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, XIT.TO has a market cap of 715.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while XIT.TO trades at CA$70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XIT.TO's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to XIT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check XIT.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs DHT-U.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, DHT-U.TO has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while DHT-U.TO trades at CA$12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DHT-U.TO's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DHT-U.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to DHT-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check DHT-U.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs FCCQ.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, FCCQ.TO has a market cap of 690.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while FCCQ.TO trades at CA$51.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCCQ.TO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCCQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is more volatile compared to FCCQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check FCCQ.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs DHT-UN.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, DHT-UN.TO has a market cap of 682.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while DHT-UN.TO trades at CA$18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DHT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DHT-UN.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to DHT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check DHT-UN.TO's competition here
FTN-PA.TO vs ZRE.TO Comparison July 2026
FTN-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTN-PA.TO stands at 930M. In comparison, ZRE.TO has a market cap of 644.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTN-PA.TO is priced at CA$10.74, while ZRE.TO trades at CA$24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTN-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZRE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTN-PA.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTN-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ZRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTN-PA.TO.Check ZRE.TO's competition here