Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAM.TO | CA$67.85 | +3.49% | 111.1B | 31.71 | CA$2.14 | +3.81% |
| BLK.NE | CA$28.41 | +1.10% | 226.8B | 27.32 | CA$1.04 | +1.96% |
| BN.TO | CA$65.29 | +5.41% | 146.1B | 97.45 | CA$0.67 | +0.55% |
| VFV.TO | CA$182.68 | +0.92% | 30.7B | 29.20 | CA$6.26 | +0.86% |
| XIC.TO | CA$54.73 | +0.64% | 28.9B | 19.59 | CA$2.79 | +2.07% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$112.78 | +0.93% | 23.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.77% |
| PSLV.TO | CA$37.02 | -5.20% | 23.6B | 1.78 | CA$20.83 | N/A |
| PHYS.TO | CA$48.42 | -0.45% | 23.1B | 3.80 | CA$12.73 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$50.30 | +0.90% | 22.3B | 19.32 | CA$2.60 | +2.26% |
| XEF.TO | CA$50.10 | -0.18% | 20.3B | 18.53 | CA$2.70 | +2.25% |
Stock Comparison
BAM.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 226.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while BLK.NE trades at CA$28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
BAM.TO vs BN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while BN.TO trades at CA$65.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 97.45. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VFV.TO trades at CA$182.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XIC.TO trades at CA$54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XIC.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$112.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZSP.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XIU.TO trades at CA$50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XEF.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XEF.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while IGM.TO trades at CA$78.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VUN.TO trades at CA$136.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VUN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$43.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XEQT.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$45.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZCN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VCN.TO trades at CA$69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VCN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XSP.TO trades at CA$75.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XSP.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$59.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CEF.TO trades at CA$69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZEA.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XUS.TO trades at CA$63.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XUS.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XBB.TO trades at CA$27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XBB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VIU.TO trades at CA$48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VIU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$112.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FBAL.NE Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FBAL.NE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FBAL.NE trades at CA$15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FBAL.NE's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FBAL.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FBAL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FBAL.NE's competition here
BAM.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VDY.TO trades at CA$72.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VDY.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CASH.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs PMEI-UN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, PMEI-UN.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while PMEI-UN.TO trades at CA$9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas PMEI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PMEI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PMEI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check PMEI-UN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while QUU.TO trades at CA$297.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check QUU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$58.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XSEM.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while TTP.TO trades at CA$39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check TTP.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VSP.TO trades at CA$117.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while TPU.TO trades at CA$58.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check TPU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$66.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZEB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while HXS.TO trades at CA$106.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check HXS.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZMMK.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XDIV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while HXT.TO trades at CA$89.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while TPE.TO trades at CA$29.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs SII.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while SII.TO trades at CA$187.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XGRO.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XUU.TO trades at CA$75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XUU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XEC.TO trades at CA$44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XEC.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$100.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZUE.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FGRO.NE Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FGRO.NE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FGRO.NE trades at CA$18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FGRO.NE's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FGRO.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FGRO.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FGRO.NE's competition here
BAM.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XQQ.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZWB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XAW.TO trades at CA$56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VEE.TO trades at CA$49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VEE.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XEI.TO trades at CA$38.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XEI.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VCE.TO trades at CA$73.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VCE.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VXC.TO trades at CA$81.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VXC.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$44.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -67.03. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check BBUC.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XBAL.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while QCN.TO trades at CA$209.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check QCN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check MNY.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XFH.TO trades at CA$41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XFH.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs HISA.NE Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, HISA.NE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while HISA.NE trades at CA$50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas HISA.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HISA.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HISA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check HISA.NE's competition here
BAM.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CMR.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$200.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZQQ.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XDV.TO trades at CA$44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while VGG.TO trades at CA$107.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check VGG.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$62.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZEM.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CACB.TO trades at CA$19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CACB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZNQ.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZNQ.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZNQ.TO trades at CA$131.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZNQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZNQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZNQ.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZWC.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check HXCN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XFN.TO trades at CA$85.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XFN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZWU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FCIV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FCIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FCIV.TO trades at CA$51.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FCIV.TO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FCIV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs DCU.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check DCU.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FCNS.NE Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FCNS.NE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FCNS.NE trades at CA$12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FCNS.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCNS.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCNS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FCNS.NE's competition here
BAM.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XGB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CYB.TO trades at CA$92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$118.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check HSAV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XEG.TO trades at CA$27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check CBIL.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XIN.TO trades at CA$45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XIN.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZDM.TO trades at CA$37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZDM.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ISIF.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while UNC.TO trades at CA$15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check ZDV.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs GCG-A.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, GCG-A.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while GCG-A.TO trades at CA$67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas GCG-A.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GCG-A.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to GCG-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check GCG-A.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs FCIQ.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, FCIQ.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while FCIQ.TO trades at CA$46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas FCIQ.TO's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCIQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCIQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check FCIQ.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check XSH.TO's competition here
BAM.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison May 2026
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 111.1B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$67.85, while EQL.TO trades at CA$42.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.71, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.Check EQL.TO's competition here