Ziff Davis, Inc.
Ziff Davis, Inc. ZD Peers
See (ZD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZD | $33.30 | +1.49% | 1.4B | 18.92 | $1.76 | N/A |
| OMC | $71.41 | +1.69% | 13.9B | 9.76 | $7.32 | +3.93% |
| IPG | $23.05 | +1.72% | 8.5B | 17.73 | $1.30 | +5.74% |
| WPP | $37.77 | -4.17% | 8.2B | 11.31 | $3.34 | +7.89% |
| MGNI | $17.60 | +0.80% | 2.5B | 80.00 | $0.22 | N/A |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| CRTO | $26.10 | -0.68% | 1.4B | 10.70 | $2.44 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.22 | -0.24% | 1.4B | 28.34 | $0.29 | N/A |
| STGW | $4.49 | +4.66% | 1.2B | -449.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CMPR | $45.25 | +0.27% | 1.1B | 7.76 | $5.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZD vs OMC Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while OMC trades at $71.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs IPG Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while IPG trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs WPP Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while WPP trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MGNI Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MGNI trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MDCA Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CRTO Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CRTO trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs IAS Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while IAS trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs STGW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while STGW trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -449.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CMPR Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CMPR trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs EEX Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 932.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while EEX trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 469.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs QNST Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 914.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while QNST trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1606.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs BOMN Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs DLX Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 665.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while DLX trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CCO Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 568.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CCO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs NCMI Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 489.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while NCMI trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -27.32. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CTV Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs BOC Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while BOC trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 470.83. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ADV Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 421.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ADV trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs QUOT Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs TRMR Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs NEXN Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while NEXN trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ADTH Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs SDM Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while SDM trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 119.83. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs TZOO Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while TZOO trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs EDHL Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while EDHL trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 445.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs TSQ Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while TSQ trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CDLX Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CDLX trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ATY Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MCTR Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MCTR trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 288.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MCHX Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MCHX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ICLK Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs STCN Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs XNET Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while XNET trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -117.60. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs INUV Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while INUV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ABLV Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ABLV trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ADTHW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs GSMG Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs FLNT Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while FLNT trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ACCS Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ACCS trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MOXC Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MOBQ Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MOBQ trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs HHS Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while HHS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs WIMI Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while WIMI trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs HAO Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while HAO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs SWAG Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while SWAG trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MOBQW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MOBQW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs STRN Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs QMMM Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while QMMM trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CHR Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CHR trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs TNMG Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while TNMG trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs STFS Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while STFS trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ISIG Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs DRCT Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while DRCT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs VSME Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while VSME trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs LDWY Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while LDWY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs DMS Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs DRCTW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs BAOS Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while BAOS trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs MGOL Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ADVWW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs CNET Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while CNET trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs STRNW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ABLVW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 865K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs TRKAW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs SWAGW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 385.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs SRAX Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 294.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while SRAX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs GSMGW Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs ZDVSV Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs TRKA Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.
ZD vs DMS-WT Comparison
ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $33.30, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 18.92, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.