Yorbeau Resources Inc.
Yorbeau Resources Inc. YRB.TO Peers
See (YRB.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YRB.TO | $0.04 | N/A | 18.46M | 2.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | $73.00 | +0.05% | 81.25B | 11.91 | $6.13 | +1.90% |
| AEM.TO | $158.99 | -0.82% | 80.38B | 24.24 | $6.56 | +1.00% |
| WPM.TO | $117.28 | -0.81% | 53.21B | 61.73 | $1.90 | +0.74% |
| ABX.TO | $25.89 | -0.88% | 44.52B | 14.07 | $1.84 | +2.14% |
| FNV.TO | $227.36 | -1.00% | 43.79B | 50.75 | $4.48 | +0.89% |
| K.TO | $20.11 | -0.98% | 24.74B | 14.68 | $1.37 | +0.83% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $35.64 | -1.63% | 14.99B | 40.97 | $0.87 | +0.28% |
| LUG.TO | $61.60 | -0.88% | 14.81B | 19.87 | $3.10 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
YRB.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 81.25B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NGT.TO trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 80.38B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while AEM.TO trades at $158.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 53.21B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while WPM.TO trades at $117.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 44.52B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ABX.TO trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 43.79B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while FNV.TO trades at $227.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 50.75. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs K.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 24.74B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while K.TO trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.99B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while AGI.TO trades at $35.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 14.81B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while LUG.TO trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.90B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while EDV.TO trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -69.51. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.46B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while OR.TO trades at $34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 143.63. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while BTO.TO trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while AAUC.TO trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ELD.TO trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while IMG.TO trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NGD.TO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while OLA.TO trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while PRU.TO trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while OGC.TO trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while EQX.TO trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while TXG.TO trades at $43.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while DPM.TO trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SSL.TO trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 84.36. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while KNT.TO trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SSRM.TO trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YRB.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while WDO.TO trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CXB.TO trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while WGX.TO trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ORA.TO trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CG.TO trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NG.TO trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -25.05. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SEA.TO trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -112.47. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CNL.TO trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -22.06. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while RUP.TO trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -168.33. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 752.72M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while GTWO.TO trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -78.25. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 719.37M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while MSA.TO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 615.63M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ORE.TO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 595.92M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while IAU.TO trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 586.34M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ASE.CN trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 483.46M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while GAU.TO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 469.10M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while PRB.TO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 468.58M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while MND.TO trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 448.06M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while FDR.V trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YRB.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 259.36M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while JAG.TO trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -29.73. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 258.80M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SBI.TO trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 245.30M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ITH.TO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -39.33. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 227.54M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while STGO.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 210.34M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 207.79M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 197.12M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while DNG.TO trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 172.95M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while FF.TO trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 136.29M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while LGD.TO trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 128.46M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SANU.CN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 107.71M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NEXG.V trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 106.68M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while LN.TO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 103.06M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while GHRT.V trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 101.33M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CBR.V trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 98.01M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while BSX.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 92.95M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while XTG.TO trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 92.27M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ELO.TO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 87.38M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while STLR.TO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs G.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 85.95M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while G.TO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 79.98M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SIG.CN trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 71.25M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 69.94M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CCM.TO trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO and CCM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YRB.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YRB.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 61.75M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CGC.V trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 60.00M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while HMR.V trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 51.50M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while VEIN.V trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YRB.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 44.07M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while ESM.TO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 42.72M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while USGD.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.69M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NVO.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO and VLC.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YRB.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 30.19M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while AMM.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 29.10M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 25.47M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while GRC.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 22.60M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while VAU.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 18.73M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while PME.TO trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 17.88M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 16.62M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while HWG.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.
YRB.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
YRB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YRB.TO stands at 18.46M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 15.72M. Regarding current trading prices, YRB.TO is priced at $0.04, while NOM.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YRB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, YRB.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YRB.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YRB.TO.