Xunlei Limited

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while OMC trades at $75.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check OMC's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while IPG trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check IPG's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while WPP trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check WPP's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MGNI trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MGNI's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MDCA trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MDCA's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while IAS trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check IAS's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ZD trades at $36.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ZD's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CMPR trades at $60.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 101.83. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CMPR's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while STGW trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -556.00. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STGW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check STGW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CRTO trades at $24.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CRTO's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while EEX trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 123.75. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check EEX's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 865.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while DLX trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check DLX's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 839.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while QNST trades at $14.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 184.25. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check QNST's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while BOMN trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check BOMN's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 586.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ADV trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ADV's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 584M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CCO trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CCO's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CTV trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CTV's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 410.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while NCMI trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check NCMI's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while QUOT trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check QUOT's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 386.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while BOC trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 626.25. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check BOC's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while TRMR trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check TRMR's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while SDM trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 206.83. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check SDM's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 316.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while NEXN trades at $9.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check NEXN's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ADTH trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ADTH's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while WIMI trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check WIMI's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while QMMM trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -28.10. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check QMMM's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while TSQ trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSQ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check TSQ's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while TZOO trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check TZOO's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ATY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ATY's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MCHX trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -19.86. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MCHX's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ICLK trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ICLK's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while STCN trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check STCN's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CDLX trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CDLX's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while VSME trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check VSME's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while INUV trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check INUV's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while FLNT trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check FLNT's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ABLV trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ABLV's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ACCS trades at $11.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ACCS's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ADTHW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while GSMG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check GSMG's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ABLVW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ABLVW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MOXC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MOXC's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MOBQ trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MOBQ's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while SWAG trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check SWAG's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while STFS trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STFS's ROE of +10.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check STFS's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while HHS trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check HHS's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MCTR trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 81.00. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MCTR's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while STRN trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check STRN's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while HAO trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check HAO's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ISIG trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ISIG's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while EDHL trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 49.90. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check EDHL's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CHR trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CHR's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while TNMG trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check TNMG's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while DRCT trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check DRCT's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while LDWY trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check LDWY's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while DMS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check DMS's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check DRCTW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while BAOS trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check BAOS's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ADVWW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MGOL trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MGOL's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while CNET trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check CNET's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while SRAX trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check SRAX's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while STRNW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check STRNW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check TRKAW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 502.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while SWAGW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check SWAGW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 143.6K. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check MOBQW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check GSMGW's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while TRKA trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check TRKA's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check ZDVSV's competition here

XNET plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNET stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XNET is priced at $5.05, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNET currently has a P/E ratio of -127.80, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNET's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XNET is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNET.Check DMS-WT's competition here