WPP plc

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while OMC trades at $77.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while IPG trades at $26.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MGNI trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 104.32. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MDCA trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while STGW trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -521.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while IAS trades at $8.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ZD trades at $32.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CRTO trades at $23.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CMPR trades at $48.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while EEX trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 526.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while QNST trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1651.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while BOMN trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while DLX trades at $16.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 568.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CCO trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ADV trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 474.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while SDM trades at $17.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 295.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CTV trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while NCMI trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -26.26. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 421.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while BOC trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 455.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while QUOT trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while TRMR trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 351.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while NEXN trades at $11.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ADTH trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while WIMI trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CDLX trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 135.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while QMMM trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while TZOO trades at $11.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while TSQ trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ATY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MCHX trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ICLK trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while INUV trades at $5.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while STCN trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while VSME trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while XNET trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -99.80. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XNET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ABLV trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while FLNT trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ACCS trades at $11.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MCTR trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while GSMG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MOXC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while SWAG trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MOBQ trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while HAO trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while STFS trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 182.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while HHS trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while STRN trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CHR trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while EDHL trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 78.88. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ISIG trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while TNMG trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while DRCT trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while LDWY trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while DMS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while BAOS trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ADVWW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while CNET trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MGOL trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while STRNW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 497.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 340K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while SRAX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 228.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while SWAGW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $29.21, while TRKA trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.82, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.