WPP plc
WPP plc WPP Peers
See (WPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPP | $40.57 | +1.12% | 8.9B | 12.26 | $3.31 | +6.15% |
| OMC | $74.11 | +0.07% | 14.5B | 10.12 | $7.32 | +3.80% |
| IPG | $24.32 | -0.04% | 9B | 18.71 | $1.30 | +5.46% |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| MGNI | $16.23 | -1.52% | 2.3B | 73.77 | $0.22 | N/A |
| CRTO | $25.48 | -0.16% | 1.4B | 10.44 | $2.44 | N/A |
| ZD | $32.13 | +0.94% | 1.4B | 18.36 | $1.75 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.07 | +0.88% | 1.3B | 27.83 | $0.29 | N/A |
| STGW | $4.84 | -0.41% | 1.3B | -484.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CMPR | $44.06 | +2.66% | 1.1B | 7.56 | $5.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WPP vs OMC Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while OMC trades at $74.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs IPG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while IPG trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MDCA Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MGNI Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MGNI trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 73.77. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CRTO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CRTO trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ZD Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ZD trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs IAS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while IAS trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STGW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while STGW trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -484.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CMPR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CMPR trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs EEX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 918.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while EEX trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 462.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs QNST Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 886.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while QNST trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1557.30. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs BOMN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DLX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while DLX trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CCO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CCO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs NCMI Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 504.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while NCMI trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -28.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CTV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs BOC Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 461.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while BOC trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 498.50. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ADV trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs QUOT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs NEXN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while NEXN trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TRMR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADTH Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TZOO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while TZOO trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SDM Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while SDM trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TSQ Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while TSQ trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CDLX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CDLX trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ATY Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MCTR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MCTR trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 294.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ICLK Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs XNET Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while XNET trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -127.20. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STCN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MCHX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MCHX trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs INUV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while INUV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ABLV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ABLV trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADTHW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs GSMG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ACCS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ACCS trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs FLNT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while FLNT trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MOXC Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MOBQW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MOBQW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MOBQ Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MOBQ trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs HHS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while HHS trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs WIMI Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while WIMI trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs HAO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while HAO trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STRN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs QMMM Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while QMMM trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SWAG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while SWAG trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TNMG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while TNMG trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CHR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CHR trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STFS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while STFS trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ISIG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DRCT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while DRCT trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs LDWY Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while LDWY trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DMS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs VSME Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while VSME trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DRCTW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADVWW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs BAOS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while BAOS trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MGOL Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CNET Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while CNET trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STRNW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ABLVW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 648.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ABLVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TRKAW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of +4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SRAX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 396.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while SRAX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SWAGW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 331.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs GSMGW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ZDVSV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DMS-WT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TRKA Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $40.57, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 12.26, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKA's ROE of +4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.