WPP plc
WPP plc WPP Peers
See (WPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPP | $35.05 | +0.89% | 7.6B | 10.49 | $3.34 | +7.11% |
| OMC | $70.24 | +1.18% | 13.7B | 9.60 | $7.32 | +4.02% |
| IPG | $23.41 | +1.43% | 8.7B | 17.87 | $1.31 | +5.69% |
| MGNI | $18.72 | -0.53% | 2.6B | 85.09 | $0.22 | N/A |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| ZD | $31.43 | -0.91% | 1.3B | 17.96 | $1.75 | N/A |
| IAS | $7.94 | -3.29% | 1.3B | 27.38 | $0.29 | N/A |
| CRTO | $23.61 | -1.25% | 1.3B | 9.68 | $2.44 | N/A |
| STGW | $4.45 | +3.49% | 1.2B | -445.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CMPR | $42.91 | +0.68% | 1.1B | 7.36 | $5.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WPP vs OMC Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while OMC trades at $70.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs IPG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while IPG trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MGNI Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MGNI trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 85.09. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MDCA Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ZD Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ZD trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs IAS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while IAS trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CRTO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CRTO trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STGW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while STGW trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -445.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CMPR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CMPR trades at $42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs EEX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 963.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while EEX trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 484.50. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs QNST Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 869.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while QNST trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1526.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs BOMN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DLX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 659.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while DLX trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CCO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 556.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CCO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 528.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ADV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs NCMI Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 488.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while NCMI trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CTV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs BOC Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 428.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while BOC trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 462.83. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs QUOT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TRMR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs NEXN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while NEXN trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADTH Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SDM Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 232.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while SDM trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 145.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs EDHL Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while EDHL trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 622.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TZOO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while TZOO trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs WIMI Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while WIMI trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TSQ Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while TSQ trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MCHX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MCHX trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CDLX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CDLX trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ATY Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ICLK Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STCN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MCTR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MCTR trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 181.50. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs XNET Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while XNET trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -86.40. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ABLV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ABLV trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs INUV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while INUV trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ACCS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ACCS trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADTHW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs GSMG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs FLNT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while FLNT trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MOXC Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MOBQ Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MOBQ trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs HHS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while HHS trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SWAG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while SWAG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STRN Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs HAO Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while HAO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs QMMM Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while QMMM trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CHR Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CHR trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TNMG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while TNMG trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STFS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while STFS trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ISIG Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DRCT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while DRCT trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs VSME Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while VSME trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs LDWY Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while LDWY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DMS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DRCTW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs BAOS Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while BAOS trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ADVWW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MGOL Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs CNET Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while CNET trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs STRNW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SRAX Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 980.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while SRAX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TRKAW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ABLVW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 407K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs SWAGW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 346K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs MOBQW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs GSMGW Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs ZDVSV Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs TRKA Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.
WPP vs DMS-WT Comparison
WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $35.05, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.49, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.