WPP plc

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 26.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PUBGY trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PGPEF trades at $93.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 15.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while OMC trades at $77.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while IPG trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while WPPGF trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DNTUY trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DNTUF trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while JCDXY trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CYGIY trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CYAGF trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MDCA trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while FRRFF trades at $71.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MGNI trades at $12.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 86.86. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while STGW trades at $5.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is 286.50. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CRTO trades at $28.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ZD trades at $31.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while IAS trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while QNST trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -92.45. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 995.55M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CMPR trades at $40.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 898.19M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while EEX trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 450.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while BOMN trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOMN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 677.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DLX trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 534.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NCMI trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -24.39. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 531.39M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CCO trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 487.81M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.89M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CTV trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 471.43M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while BOC trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is -381.75. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.81M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 430.08M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ADV trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 410.73M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while YUGVF trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 351.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.42M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while QUOT trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.68M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TRMR trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 343.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NEXN trades at $10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.25M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.52M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ADTH trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 276.45M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PTMEY trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 227.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SCPPF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 217.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PROM trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 165.42M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TZOO trades at $14.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while KLTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 140.98M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 125.14M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 111.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MCTR trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 365.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 111.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CDLX trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 110.09M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TSQ trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 102.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while EDHL trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.89M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ATY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82.01M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ICLK trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while STCN trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.68M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 64.95M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ABLV trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -21.92. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 64.35M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 61.46M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MCHX trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 56.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while INUV trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 54.93M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while OPESF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 54.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while XNET trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 52.75M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CYPXF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 45.78M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while FLNT trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.37M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 42.13M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while WIMI trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GSMG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 38.90M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while IFUS trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MOXC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 35.74M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GMGZ trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 34.55M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ACCS trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 34.49M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while HHS trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 34.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MOBQ trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.15M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.63M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while EZOO trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 25.42M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while HAO trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.68M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while STRN trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 24.66M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CNFN trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ACHN trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 20.28M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SWAG trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 15.18M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CHR trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 14.31M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SNIPF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 14.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while STFS trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.90M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ISIG trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISIG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 12.48M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while QMMM trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 8.60M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while AATV trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while VSME trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 7.92M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TNMG trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.49M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DMS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 7.46M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SPTY trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DRCT trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while LDWY trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.77M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while INEOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.59M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while UCPA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CNET trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while VYBE trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.41M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MGOL trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while BAOS trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TGNT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while STRNW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while BYOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CMGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DBMM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while FBOP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MMND trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985860.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CEENF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 944503.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PVSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 851053.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 764715.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while LIGA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 614141.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CMGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 597597.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SRAX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 579737.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ABLVW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529804.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of +4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484189.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DMSL trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 339927.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 182213.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SWAGW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 157051.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while SNPW trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 138998.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while WWIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 135773.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MOBQW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 117916.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NWCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76834.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ACTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37413.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NXMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34888.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TRBO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22720.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PRKI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 20969.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while NBDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18377.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while EPGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15108.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while RFII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14086.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GBXI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 12810.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while PSYC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9097.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8450.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while CYGT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4260.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ISML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3864.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while WGEE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 3456.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while GTRL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2361.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while BXNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 2331.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ITKH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while BWAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ADST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while LOGX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while VPSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VPSN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ZULU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ZULU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ZDVSV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, MYRY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while MYRY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, ADTY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while ADTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, DMS-WT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, TRKA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while TRKA trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRKA's ROE of +4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.

WPP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WPP stands at 8.45B. In comparison, LTMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WPP is priced at $39.16, while LTMP trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WPP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, WPP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPP is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPP.