World Houseware (Holdings) Limited
World Houseware (Holdings) Limited (WHWRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WHWRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHWRF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 39.6M | -1.00 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| CODGF | $114.45 | +0.00% | 56.9B | 17.58 | $6.51 | +2.00% |
| CODYY | $21.24 | -8.13% | 52.7B | 16.32 | $1.30 | +2.35% |
| DKILF | $131.62 | +12.72% | 38.4B | 21.45 | $6.12 | +1.71% |
| DKILY | $12.52 | +2.12% | 36.6B | 20.51 | $0.61 | +1.32% |
| GBERY | $75.47 | -2.01% | 25.1B | 33.82 | $2.24 | +2.03% |
| GBERF | $770.00 | +6.94% | 24.4B | 34.41 | $22.38 | +2.01% |
| KGSPF | $80.60 | -6.84% | 15B | 19.60 | $4.21 | +0.75% |
| KGSPY | $80.16 | -3.43% | 14.7B | 19.26 | $4.18 | +0.84% |
| BLHWF | $963.02 | +0.00% | 11.8B | 55.57 | $17.33 | +1.20% |
Stock Comparison
WHWRF vs CODGF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while CODGF trades at $114.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to CODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check CODGF's competition here
WHWRF vs CODYY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while CODYY trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check CODYY's competition here
WHWRF vs DKILF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while DKILF trades at $131.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check DKILF's competition here
WHWRF vs DKILY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while DKILY trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check DKILY's competition here
WHWRF vs GBERY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GBERY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while GBERY trades at $75.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GBERY's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GBERY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to GBERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check GBERY's competition here
WHWRF vs GBERF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GBERF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while GBERF trades at $770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GBERF's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GBERF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to GBERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check GBERF's competition here
WHWRF vs KGSPF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while KGSPF trades at $80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check KGSPF's competition here
WHWRF vs KGSPY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while KGSPY trades at $80.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check KGSPY's competition here
WHWRF vs BLHWF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BLHWF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while BLHWF trades at $963.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BLHWF's P/E ratio is 55.57. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BLHWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to BLHWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check BLHWF's competition here
WHWRF vs NIABY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NIABY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while NIABY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NIABY's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NIABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to NIABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check NIABY's competition here
WHWRF vs NDRBF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while NDRBF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to NDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check NDRBF's competition here
WHWRF vs RKWAF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is less volatile compared to RKWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check RKWAF's competition here
WHWRF vs RKWBF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while RKWBF trades at $45.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is less volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check RKWBF's competition here
WHWRF vs TOTDY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while TOTDY trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check TOTDY's competition here
WHWRF vs FGSGF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while FGSGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to FGSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check FGSGF's competition here
WHWRF vs JSGRY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while JSGRY trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check JSGRY's competition here
WHWRF vs JSGCF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to JSGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check JSGCF's competition here
WHWRF vs SNWAF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while SNWAF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to SNWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check SNWAF's competition here
WHWRF vs CSRLF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check CSRLF's competition here
WHWRF vs UPNRY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check UPNRY's competition here
WHWRF vs UPNRF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to UPNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check UPNRF's competition here
WHWRF vs RLLWF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while RLLWF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to RLLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check RLLWF's competition here
WHWRF vs TPRKY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while TPRKY trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check TPRKY's competition here
WHWRF vs FBOHY Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FBOHY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while FBOHY trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FBOHY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FBOHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to FBOHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check FBOHY's competition here
WHWRF vs TVPKF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while TVPKF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to TVPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check TVPKF's competition here
WHWRF vs FBOHF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FBOHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while FBOHF trades at $840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FBOHF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FBOHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to FBOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check FBOHF's competition here
WHWRF vs SCWTF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SCWTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while SCWTF trades at $768.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SCWTF's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to SCWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check SCWTF's competition here
WHWRF vs VLUTF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 910.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to VLUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check VLUTF's competition here
WHWRF vs LPUSF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to LPUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check LPUSF's competition here
WHWRF vs NRTZF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while NRTZF trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check NRTZF's competition here
WHWRF vs PLSNF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to PLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check PLSNF's competition here
WHWRF vs MCCK Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while MCCK trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check MCCK's competition here
WHWRF vs ECELF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while ECELF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to ECELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check ECELF's competition here
WHWRF vs BURCB Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BURCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to BURCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check BURCB's competition here
WHWRF vs BURCA Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while BURCA trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BURCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check BURCA's competition here
WHWRF vs LGNC Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while LGNC trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to LGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check LGNC's competition here
WHWRF vs OATN Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while OATN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OATN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to OATN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check OATN's competition here
WHWRF vs UPIPF Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to UPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check UPIPF's competition here
WHWRF vs ZHUD Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 160.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while ZHUD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check ZHUD's competition here
WHWRF vs LPPI Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is more volatile compared to LPPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check LPPI's competition here
WHWRF vs AFIIQ Comparison August 2025
WHWRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHWRF stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WHWRF is priced at $0.05, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHWRF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHWRF is less volatile compared to AFIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHWRF.Check AFIIQ's competition here