NIBE Industrier AB (publ)
NIBE Industrier AB (publ) (NIABY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NIABY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIABY | $4.37 | -9.15% | 8.8B | 36.42 | $0.12 | +0.71% |
| DKILY | $14.82 | -2.82% | 43.5B | 25.17 | $0.59 | +7.86% |
| CODGF | $87.20 | +1.44% | 43B | 12.98 | $6.72 | +2.88% |
| DKILF | $146.28 | -3.80% | 41.8B | 24.09 | $5.93 | +1.55% |
| CODYY | $16.97 | -3.63% | 41.8B | 12.67 | $1.34 | +2.98% |
| KGSPY | $82.60 | -3.66% | 15B | 19.29 | $4.30 | +0.77% |
| KGSPF | $82.26 | -4.36% | 14.8B | 19.13 | $4.30 | +0.79% |
| NDRBF | $4.10 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 25.62 | $0.16 | +0.76% |
| RKWAF | $34.70 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 13.24 | $2.62 | N/A |
| TOTDY | $42.01 | -4.33% | 7B | 27.28 | $1.54 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
NIABY vs DKILY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while DKILY trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check DKILY's competition here
NIABY vs CODGF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while CODGF trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to CODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check CODGF's competition here
NIABY vs DKILF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while DKILF trades at $146.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check DKILF's competition here
NIABY vs CODYY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while CODYY trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check CODYY's competition here
NIABY vs KGSPY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while KGSPY trades at $82.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check KGSPY's competition here
NIABY vs KGSPF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while KGSPF trades at $82.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check KGSPF's competition here
NIABY vs NDRBF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while NDRBF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to NDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check NDRBF's competition here
NIABY vs RKWAF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to RKWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check RKWAF's competition here
NIABY vs TOTDY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while TOTDY trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check TOTDY's competition here
NIABY vs SNWAF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while SNWAF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to SNWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check SNWAF's competition here
NIABY vs FGSGF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while FGSGF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to FGSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check FGSGF's competition here
NIABY vs RKWBF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while RKWBF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check RKWBF's competition here
NIABY vs JSGCF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to JSGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check JSGCF's competition here
NIABY vs JSGRY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while JSGRY trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 54.44. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check JSGRY's competition here
NIABY vs CSRLF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check CSRLF's competition here
NIABY vs UPNRY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check UPNRY's competition here
NIABY vs UPNRF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to UPNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check UPNRF's competition here
NIABY vs RLLWF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while RLLWF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to RLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check RLLWF's competition here
NIABY vs TVPKF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while TVPKF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to TVPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check TVPKF's competition here
NIABY vs TPRKY Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while TPRKY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check TPRKY's competition here
NIABY vs VLUTF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 912.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to VLUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check VLUTF's competition here
NIABY vs LPUSF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to LPUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check LPUSF's competition here
NIABY vs MCCK Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 551.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while MCCK trades at $73.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check MCCK's competition here
NIABY vs NRTZF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 524.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while NRTZF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check NRTZF's competition here
NIABY vs PLSNF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to PLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check PLSNF's competition here
NIABY vs ECELF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while ECELF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to ECELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check ECELF's competition here
NIABY vs BURCB Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BURCB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to BURCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check BURCB's competition here
NIABY vs BURCA Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while BURCA trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BURCA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check BURCA's competition here
NIABY vs LGNC Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while LGNC trades at $320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to LGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check LGNC's competition here
NIABY vs WHWRF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check WHWRF's competition here
NIABY vs OATN Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while OATN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OATN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to OATN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check OATN's competition here
NIABY vs UPIPF Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to UPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check UPIPF's competition here
NIABY vs ZHUD Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while ZHUD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check ZHUD's competition here
NIABY vs LPPI Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is more volatile compared to LPPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check LPPI's competition here
NIABY vs AFIIQ Comparison May 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 8.8B. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.37, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.42, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to AFIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check AFIIQ's competition here