NIBE Industrier AB (publ)
NIBE Industrier AB (publ) (NIABY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NIABY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIABY | $4.80 | +1.05% | 9.6B | 36.54 | $0.13 | +0.66% |
| CODGF | $91.40 | +0.38% | 46.6B | 13.89 | $6.80 | +2.66% |
| CODYY | $18.23 | -4.10% | 45.1B | 13.47 | $1.36 | +2.77% |
| DKILF | $140.65 | +9.01% | 41.4B | 24.09 | $5.87 | +1.59% |
| DKILY | $13.38 | +2.02% | 39.5B | 22.87 | $0.59 | +8.18% |
| GBERF | $667.25 | -3.23% | 22.7B | 30.33 | $22.73 | +1.55% |
| GBERY | $68.24 | +0.34% | 22.5B | 29.72 | $2.29 | +1.44% |
| KGSPF | $93.66 | -0.15% | 16.9B | 21.85 | $4.31 | +0.69% |
| KGSPY | $93.09 | +1.66% | 16.9B | 21.73 | $4.32 | +0.52% |
| BLHWF | $778.22 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 40.98 | $18.99 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
NIABY vs CODGF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while CODGF trades at $91.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and CODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODGF's competition here
NIABY vs CODYY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while CODYY trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check CODYY's competition here
NIABY vs DKILF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while DKILF trades at $140.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check DKILF's competition here
NIABY vs DKILY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while DKILY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check DKILY's competition here
NIABY vs GBERF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GBERF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while GBERF trades at $667.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas GBERF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBERF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and GBERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBERF's competition here
NIABY vs GBERY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GBERY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while GBERY trades at $68.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas GBERY's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBERY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to GBERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check GBERY's competition here
NIABY vs KGSPF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while KGSPF trades at $93.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check KGSPF's competition here
NIABY vs KGSPY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while KGSPY trades at $93.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check KGSPY's competition here
NIABY vs BLHWF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BLHWF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while BLHWF trades at $778.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BLHWF's P/E ratio is 40.98. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLHWF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to BLHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check BLHWF's competition here
NIABY vs NDRBF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while NDRBF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and NDRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDRBF's competition here
NIABY vs RKWAF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and RKWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKWAF's competition here
NIABY vs TOTDY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while TOTDY trades at $33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 223.27. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check TOTDY's competition here
NIABY vs FGSGF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while FGSGF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and FGSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGSGF's competition here
NIABY vs SNWAF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while SNWAF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and SNWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNWAF's competition here
NIABY vs RKWBF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while RKWBF trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check RKWBF's competition here
NIABY vs JSGCF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and JSGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSGCF's competition here
NIABY vs JSGRY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while JSGRY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check JSGRY's competition here
NIABY vs CSRLF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check CSRLF's competition here
NIABY vs UPNRY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check UPNRY's competition here
NIABY vs UPNRF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and UPNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPNRF's competition here
NIABY vs TVPKF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while TVPKF trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -42.89. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and TVPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVPKF's competition here
NIABY vs TPRKY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while TPRKY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check TPRKY's competition here
NIABY vs RLLWF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while RLLWF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to RLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check RLLWF's competition here
NIABY vs FBOHY Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FBOHY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while FBOHY trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas FBOHY's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBOHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to FBOHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check FBOHY's competition here
NIABY vs FBOHF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FBOHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while FBOHF trades at $839.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas FBOHF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBOHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to FBOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check FBOHF's competition here
NIABY vs VLUTF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 912.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and VLUTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLUTF's competition here
NIABY vs LPUSF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and LPUSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPUSF's competition here
NIABY vs NRTZF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while NRTZF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check NRTZF's competition here
NIABY vs MCCK Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while MCCK trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and MCCK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCCK's competition here
NIABY vs SCWTF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SCWTF has a market cap of 519.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while SCWTF trades at $362.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas SCWTF's P/E ratio is -44.24. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCWTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and SCWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCWTF's competition here
NIABY vs PLSNF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and PLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLSNF's competition here
NIABY vs ECELF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while ECELF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and ECELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECELF's competition here
NIABY vs BURCB Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BURCB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and BURCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BURCB's competition here
NIABY vs BURCA Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while BURCA trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BURCA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check BURCA's competition here
NIABY vs LGNC Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while LGNC trades at $320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and LGNC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGNC's competition here
NIABY vs WHWRF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIABY.Check WHWRF's competition here
NIABY vs OATN Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while OATN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OATN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and OATN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OATN's competition here
NIABY vs UPIPF Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and UPIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPIPF's competition here
NIABY vs ZHUD Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while ZHUD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and ZHUD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZHUD's competition here
NIABY vs LPPI Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and LPPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPPI's competition here
NIABY vs AFIIQ Comparison April 2026
NIABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIABY stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NIABY is priced at $4.80, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIABY currently has a P/E ratio of 36.54, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIABY and AFIIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFIIQ's competition here