Travis Perkins plc
Travis Perkins plc (TPRKY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TPRKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPRKY | $6.82 | -2.19% | 1.4B | -6.00 | -$1.13 | +2.35% |
| DKILY | $15.25 | -4.87% | 44.6B | 25.39 | $0.60 | +7.68% |
| CODYY | $17.54 | +1.98% | 43.1B | 12.97 | $1.35 | +2.89% |
| CODGF | $87.20 | +1.44% | 43B | 12.86 | $6.78 | +2.88% |
| DKILF | $152.07 | -4.77% | 42.6B | 24.40 | $5.96 | +1.52% |
| KGSPF | $86.01 | +1.56% | 15.5B | 19.91 | $4.32 | +0.76% |
| KGSPY | $85.78 | +0.88% | 15.5B | 19.95 | $4.30 | +0.75% |
| NIABY | $4.48 | -1.10% | 9B | 37.33 | $0.12 | +0.70% |
| NDRBF | $4.10 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 25.62 | $0.16 | +0.76% |
| TOTDY | $43.91 | -2.10% | 7.3B | 28.49 | $1.54 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
TPRKY vs DKILY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while DKILY trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check DKILY's competition here
TPRKY vs CODYY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while CODYY trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check CODYY's competition here
TPRKY vs CODGF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while CODGF trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and CODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODGF's competition here
TPRKY vs DKILF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while DKILF trades at $152.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check DKILF's competition here
TPRKY vs KGSPF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while KGSPF trades at $86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and KGSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGSPF's competition here
TPRKY vs KGSPY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while KGSPY trades at $85.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check KGSPY's competition here
TPRKY vs NIABY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NIABY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while NIABY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NIABY's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NIABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to NIABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check NIABY's competition here
TPRKY vs NDRBF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while NDRBF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and NDRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDRBF's competition here
TPRKY vs TOTDY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while TOTDY trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check TOTDY's competition here
TPRKY vs RKWAF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and RKWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKWAF's competition here
TPRKY vs FGSGF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while FGSGF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and FGSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGSGF's competition here
TPRKY vs SNWAF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while SNWAF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and SNWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNWAF's competition here
TPRKY vs RKWBF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while RKWBF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check RKWBF's competition here
TPRKY vs JSGCF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and JSGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSGCF's competition here
TPRKY vs JSGRY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while JSGRY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and JSGRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSGRY's competition here
TPRKY vs CSRLF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check CSRLF's competition here
TPRKY vs UPNRY Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check UPNRY's competition here
TPRKY vs UPNRF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and UPNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPNRF's competition here
TPRKY vs RLLWF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while RLLWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and RLLWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLLWF's competition here
TPRKY vs TVPKF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while TVPKF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and TVPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVPKF's competition here
TPRKY vs VLUTF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 912.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and VLUTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLUTF's competition here
TPRKY vs LPUSF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and LPUSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPUSF's competition here
TPRKY vs MCCK Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 550.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while MCCK trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check MCCK's competition here
TPRKY vs NRTZF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 524.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while NRTZF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and NRTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRTZF's competition here
TPRKY vs PLSNF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and PLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLSNF's competition here
TPRKY vs ECELF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while ECELF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and ECELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECELF's competition here
TPRKY vs BURCB Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BURCB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and BURCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BURCB's competition here
TPRKY vs BURCA Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while BURCA trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BURCA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check BURCA's competition here
TPRKY vs LGNC Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while LGNC trades at $320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and LGNC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGNC's competition here
TPRKY vs WHWRF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check WHWRF's competition here
TPRKY vs OATN Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while OATN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OATN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and OATN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OATN's competition here
TPRKY vs UPIPF Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and UPIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPIPF's competition here
TPRKY vs ZHUD Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while ZHUD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check ZHUD's competition here
TPRKY vs LPPI Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY and LPPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPPI's competition here
TPRKY vs AFIIQ Comparison May 2026
TPRKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPRKY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TPRKY is priced at $6.82, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPRKY currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPRKY's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TPRKY is less volatile compared to AFIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPRKY.Check AFIIQ's competition here