Reliance Worldwide Corporation Limited
Reliance Worldwide Corporation Limited (RLLWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RLLWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLLWF | $2.22 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 17.08 | $0.13 | +2.03% |
| DKILY | $15.09 | +1.82% | 44.2B | 25.57 | $0.59 | +7.74% |
| CODGF | $87.65 | +0.52% | 43.2B | 13.04 | $6.72 | +2.87% |
| CODYY | $17.39 | +2.47% | 43B | 13.01 | $1.34 | +2.90% |
| DKILF | $143.36 | -1.99% | 42B | 24.18 | $5.93 | +1.48% |
| KGSPY | $84.49 | +2.29% | 15.4B | 19.99 | $4.27 | +0.75% |
| KGSPF | $84.83 | +3.13% | 15.3B | 19.87 | $4.27 | +0.77% |
| NIABY | $4.30 | -1.60% | 8.7B | 33.04 | $0.13 | N/A |
| NDRBF | $4.10 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 25.62 | $0.16 | +0.90% |
| RKWAF | $34.70 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 13.24 | $2.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RLLWF vs DKILY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while DKILY trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check DKILY's competition here
RLLWF vs CODGF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while CODGF trades at $87.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to CODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check CODGF's competition here
RLLWF vs CODYY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while CODYY trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check CODYY's competition here
RLLWF vs DKILF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while DKILF trades at $143.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check DKILF's competition here
RLLWF vs KGSPY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while KGSPY trades at $84.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check KGSPY's competition here
RLLWF vs KGSPF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while KGSPF trades at $84.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check KGSPF's competition here
RLLWF vs NIABY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NIABY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while NIABY trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas NIABY's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to NIABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check NIABY's competition here
RLLWF vs NDRBF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while NDRBF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to NDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check NDRBF's competition here
RLLWF vs RKWAF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to RKWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check RKWAF's competition here
RLLWF vs TOTDY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while TOTDY trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check TOTDY's competition here
RLLWF vs SNWAF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while SNWAF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to SNWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check SNWAF's competition here
RLLWF vs FGSGF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while FGSGF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to FGSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check FGSGF's competition here
RLLWF vs RKWBF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while RKWBF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check RKWBF's competition here
RLLWF vs JSGCF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to JSGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check JSGCF's competition here
RLLWF vs JSGRY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while JSGRY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 56.94. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check JSGRY's competition here
RLLWF vs CSRLF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check CSRLF's competition here
RLLWF vs UPNRY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check UPNRY's competition here
RLLWF vs UPNRF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to UPNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check UPNRF's competition here
RLLWF vs TVPKF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while TVPKF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to TVPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check TVPKF's competition here
RLLWF vs TPRKY Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while TPRKY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check TPRKY's competition here
RLLWF vs VLUTF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 912.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to VLUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check VLUTF's competition here
RLLWF vs LPUSF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to LPUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check LPUSF's competition here
RLLWF vs MCCK Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 551.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while MCCK trades at $73.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check MCCK's competition here
RLLWF vs NRTZF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 524.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while NRTZF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check NRTZF's competition here
RLLWF vs PLSNF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to PLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check PLSNF's competition here
RLLWF vs ECELF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while ECELF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to ECELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check ECELF's competition here
RLLWF vs BURCB Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BURCB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to BURCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check BURCB's competition here
RLLWF vs BURCA Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while BURCA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BURCA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check BURCA's competition here
RLLWF vs LGNC Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while LGNC trades at $320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to LGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check LGNC's competition here
RLLWF vs WHWRF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check WHWRF's competition here
RLLWF vs OATN Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while OATN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OATN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to OATN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check OATN's competition here
RLLWF vs UPIPF Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to UPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check UPIPF's competition here
RLLWF vs ZHUD Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while ZHUD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check ZHUD's competition here
RLLWF vs LPPI Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is more volatile compared to LPPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check LPPI's competition here
RLLWF vs AFIIQ Comparison May 2026
RLLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLLWF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RLLWF is priced at $2.22, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLLWF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RLLWF is less volatile compared to AFIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLLWF.Check AFIIQ's competition here