Westward Gold Inc.
Westward Gold Inc. (WG.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WG.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WG.CN | CA$0.13 | -3.70% | 23.7M | -13.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$92.56 | +7.17% | 101.7B | 12.12 | CA$7.64 | +1.61% |
| AEM.TO | CA$185.42 | +7.34% | 93.1B | 22.75 | CA$8.15 | +1.30% |
| WPM.TO | CA$135.03 | +6.27% | 61.3B | 71.82 | CA$1.88 | +0.70% |
| ABX.TO | CA$31.06 | +5.40% | 53.4B | 17.07 | CA$1.82 | +2.42% |
| FNV.TO | CA$235.64 | +5.69% | 45.4B | 53.07 | CA$4.44 | +0.92% |
| K.TO | CA$25.03 | +11.99% | 30.7B | 14.64 | CA$1.71 | +0.75% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$69.12 | +6.37% | 16.7B | 22.51 | CA$3.07 | +3.36% |
| AGI.TO | CA$36.16 | +5.61% | 15.2B | 32.00 | CA$1.13 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
WG.CN vs NGT.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NGT.TO trades at CA$92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NGT.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs AEM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AEM.TO trades at CA$185.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AEM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs WPM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while WPM.TO trades at CA$135.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 71.82. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check WPM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ABX.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ABX.TO trades at CA$31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ABX.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs FNV.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while FNV.TO trades at CA$235.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 53.07. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check FNV.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs K.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while K.TO trades at CA$25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check K.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs NCM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NCM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs LUG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while LUG.TO trades at CA$69.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check LUG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs AGI.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AGI.TO trades at CA$36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AGI.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs EDV.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while EDV.TO trades at CA$45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check EDV.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs OR.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while OR.TO trades at CA$40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 168.96. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OR.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs YRI.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check YRI.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs BTO.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BTO.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs EQX.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check EQX.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ELD.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ELD.TO trades at CA$31.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ELD.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs IMG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while IMG.TO trades at CA$10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check IMG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs NGD.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NGD.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs OGC.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while OGC.TO trades at CA$19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OGC.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs OLA.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while OLA.TO trades at CA$13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 35.66. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OLA.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs PRU.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check PRU.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SSL.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SSL.TO trades at CA$13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 97.07. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SSL.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs DPM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while DPM.TO trades at CA$23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check DPM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SSRM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs KNT.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while KNT.TO trades at CA$15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check KNT.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs TXG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while TXG.TO trades at CA$41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check TXG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs NG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NG.TO trades at CA$7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -22.08. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs CEE.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEE.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ORA.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ORA.TO trades at CA$33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -18.89. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ORA.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs WDO.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while WDO.TO trades at CA$17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check WDO.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs CXB.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CXB.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SEA.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SEA.TO trades at CA$22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -151.20. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SEA.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs WGX.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check WGX.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs AAUC.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs CG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CG.TO trades at CA$10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs OSK.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OSK.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SBB.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SBB.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs RUP.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -170.67. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check RUP.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs KRR.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check KRR.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs CNL.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CNL.TO trades at CA$13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -19.86. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CNL.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ASE.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ASE.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs MSA.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 767.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MSA.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs GTWO.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 733M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -76.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs AR.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AR.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs IAU.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 632.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check IAU.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ORE.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ORE.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs GAU.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 520.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.20. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GAU.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs MND.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MND.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs PRB.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 454.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check PRB.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SGD.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGD.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs MOZ.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ITH.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -57.67. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ITH.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs FDR.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check FDR.V's competition here
WG.CN vs JAG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while JAG.TO trades at CA$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check JAG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs STGO.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check STGO.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SBI.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SBI.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs GOLD.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs DNG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check DNG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs FF.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check FF.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs VGZ.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs LGD.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check LGD.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs G.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while G.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check G.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs BSX.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BSX.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs TNX.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check TNX.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs ELO.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ELO.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs COG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check COG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs LN.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check LN.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs NEXG.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NEXG.V's competition here
WG.CN vs STLR.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check STLR.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs XTG.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 102.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check XTG.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs MAW.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MAW.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs CBR.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CBR.V's competition here
WG.CN vs GHRT.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GHRT.V's competition here
WG.CN vs SANU.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SANU.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs CCM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CCM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SIG.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SIG.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs ESM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ESM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs BLLG.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs RISE.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check RISE.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs CGC.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CGC.V's competition here
WG.CN vs VEIN.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VEIN.V's competition here
WG.CN vs TML.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TML.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs HMR.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check HMR.V's competition here
WG.CN vs USGD.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check USGD.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs ME.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ME.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs NOM.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NOM.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs GTCH.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs NHK.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NHK.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs BNN.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BNN.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs NVO.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NVO.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs VLC.V Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN and VLC.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLC.V's competition here
WG.CN vs AMM.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AMM.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs AUOZ.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs VGCX.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs SGNL.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs GRC.TO Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GRC.TO's competition here
WG.CN vs HWG.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check HWG.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs QIM.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check QIM.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs IRV.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check IRV.CN's competition here
WG.CN vs CTOC.CN Comparison August 2025
WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CTOC.CN's competition here