Westward Gold Inc.

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NGT.TO trades at CA$98.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NGT.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while AEM.TO trades at CA$189.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AEM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ABX.TO trades at CA$36.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ABX.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while WPM.TO trades at CA$132.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check WPM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while FNV.TO trades at CA$253.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check FNV.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while K.TO trades at CA$27.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check K.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while LUG.TO trades at CA$80.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check LUG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NCM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while AGI.TO trades at CA$39.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AGI.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while EDV.TO trades at CA$47.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check EDV.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while EQX.TO trades at CA$11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is -62.33. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check EQX.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while OR.TO trades at CA$42.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 73.53. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OR.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check YRI.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BTO.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while IMG.TO trades at CA$12.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check IMG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ELD.TO trades at CA$32.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ELD.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NGD.TO trades at CA$7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NGD.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while OGC.TO trades at CA$23.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OGC.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SSRM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 144.70. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OLA.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check PRU.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SSL.TO trades at CA$15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 88.41. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SSL.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while DPM.TO trades at CA$25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check DPM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while TXG.TO trades at CA$42.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check TXG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NG.TO trades at CA$8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check KNT.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ORA.TO trades at CA$38.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -33.55. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ORA.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CEE.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check WGX.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while WDO.TO trades at CA$17.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check WDO.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CXB.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SEA.TO trades at CA$22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -41.29. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SEA.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CG.TO trades at CA$10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$18.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AAUC.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check OSK.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CNL.TO trades at CA$15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CNL.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SBB.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check KRR.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -168.67. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check RUP.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 965.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while MSA.TO trades at CA$3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MSA.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 847.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while IAU.TO trades at CA$1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check IAU.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 811.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -25.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ASE.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 757.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -78.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GTWO.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 749.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.75. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GAU.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ORE.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AR.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 487.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -21.73. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check PRB.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MND.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SGD.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -63.67. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ITH.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MOZ.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 374.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check STGO.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 368.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -60.17. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check FDR.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while JAG.TO trades at CA$4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check JAG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SBI.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GOLD.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check FF.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check DNG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 190.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VGZ.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check LGD.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check LN.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while G.TO trades at CA$1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check G.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check TNX.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NEXG.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BSX.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check COG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check STLR.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CBR.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ELO.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check XTG.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GHRT.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MAW.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SANU.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BLLG.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CCM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ESM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SIG.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check CGC.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check TML.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VEIN.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check HMR.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GTCH.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check ME.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NOM.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check USGD.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NHK.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check BNN.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, MLM.NE has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while MLM.NE trades at CA$0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MLM.NE's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MLM.NE's ROE of +31.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to MLM.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check MLM.NE's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VLC.V's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check AMM.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check NVO.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check VGCX.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check SGNL.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check QIM.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check GRC.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check HWG.CN's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check YRB.TO's competition here

WG.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WG.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WG.CN is priced at CA$0.12, while PME.TO trades at CA$3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, WG.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WG.CN is more volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WG.CN.Check PME.TO's competition here