Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while RPRX trades at $57.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check RPRX's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while CORT trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 326.37. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to CORT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check CORT's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while LQDA trades at $91.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is 650.21. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LQDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check LQDA's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while KNSA trades at $76.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 85.03. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check KNSA's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TRLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while TRLV trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas TRLV's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TRLV's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to TRLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check TRLV's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HROWL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while HROWL trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas HROWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HROWL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to HROWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check HROWL's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HROWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while HROWM trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas HROWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HROWM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to HROWM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check HROWM's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LTGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while LTGO trades at $18.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LTGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LTGO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to LTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check LTGO's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CUVL has a market cap of 339.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while CUVL trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CUVL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CUVL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is similarly volatile compared to CUVL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check CUVL's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LFMD has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while LFMD trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LFMD's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LFMD's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to LFMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check LFMD's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LFMDP has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while LFMDP trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LFMDP's P/E ratio is -724.19. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LFMDP's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is similarly volatile compared to LFMDP. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check LFMDP's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CIRC has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while CIRC trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CIRC's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CIRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to CIRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check CIRC's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RAD has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while RAD trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas RAD's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RAD's ROE of +2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to RAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check RAD's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GLTO has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while GLTO trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas GLTO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GLTO's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to GLTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check GLTO's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while SCYX trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check SCYX's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NSRX has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while NSRX trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas NSRX's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NSRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to NSRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check NSRX's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SDEV has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while SDEV trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas SDEV's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SDEV's ROE of +7.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to SDEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check SDEV's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CNSY has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while CNSY trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CNSY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CNSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to CNSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check CNSY's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BFRI has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while BFRI trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas BFRI's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BFRI's ROE of -4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to BFRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check BFRI's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CJJD has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while CJJD trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CJJD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CJJD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to CJJD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check CJJD's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SSY has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while SSY trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas SSY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SSY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to SSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check SSY's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, POM has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while POM trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas POM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to POM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to POM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check POM's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while PAVS trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check PAVS's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while HKPD trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HKPD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check HKPD's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AIXC has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while AIXC trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas AIXC's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AIXC's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to AIXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check AIXC's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MDVL has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while MDVL trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas MDVL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MDVL's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to MDVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check MDVL's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ATNFW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while ATNFW trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas ATNFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ATNFW's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to ATNFW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check ATNFW's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BGMSP has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while BGMSP trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas BGMSP's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BGMSP's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to BGMSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check BGMSP's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BGMS has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while BGMS trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas BGMS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BGMS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to BGMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check BGMS's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AZNH has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while AZNH trades at $53.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas AZNH's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AZNH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to AZNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check AZNH's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LFLYW has a market cap of 299.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while LFLYW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LFLYW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LFLYW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is similarly volatile compared to LFLYW. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check LFLYW's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SBFMW has a market cap of 175.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while SBFMW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas SBFMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SBFMW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to SBFMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check SBFMW's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ESRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while ESRX trades at $92.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas ESRX's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ESRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is similarly volatile compared to ESRX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check ESRX's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, POZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while POZN trades at $5.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas POZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to POZN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to POZN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check POZN's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OREX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while OREX trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas OREX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to OREX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to OREX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check OREX's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IPXL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while IPXL trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas IPXL's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IPXL's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to IPXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check IPXL's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CPD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while CPD trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CPD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is less volatile compared to CPD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check CPD's competition here

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBA) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBA stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SHPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WBA is priced at $11.98 on the NASDAQ, while SHPG trades at $179.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas SHPG's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, WBA's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SHPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WBA is similarly volatile compared to SHPG. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBA.Check SHPG's competition here