MegaWatt Lithium and Battery Metals Corp.
MegaWatt Lithium and Battery Metals Corp. (WALRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WALRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALRF | $0.01 | -20.18% | 324.1K | -0.22 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.54 | -8.42% | 129.6B | 11.40 | $2.24 | +4.86% |
| RTNTF | $74.71 | -4.46% | 104B | 10.57 | $7.07 | +3.01% |
| RTPPF | $58.60 | -4.72% | 100.1B | 8.29 | $7.07 | +6.86% |
| GLNCY | $7.96 | -2.57% | 49.3B | -30.58 | -$0.26 | +2.65% |
| GMBXF | $6.37 | -2.29% | 49B | 13.10 | $0.48 | +3.80% |
| GLCNF | $4.00 | -2.20% | 48.2B | -31.23 | -$0.13 | +2.83% |
| FSUMF | $12.10 | +0.83% | 37.2B | 9.60 | $1.26 | +7.61% |
| FSUGY | $23.06 | -1.91% | 35.5B | 9.13 | $2.53 | +7.79% |
| AAUKF | $28.89 | -3.54% | 31.2B | -10.07 | -$2.87 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
WALRF vs BHPLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check BHPLF's competition here
WALRF vs RTNTF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $74.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
WALRF vs RTPPF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check RTPPF's competition here
WALRF vs GLNCY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check GLNCY's competition here
WALRF vs GMBXF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check GMBXF's competition here
WALRF vs GLCNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -31.23. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check GLCNF's competition here
WALRF vs FSUMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check FSUMF's competition here
WALRF vs FSUGY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check FSUGY's competition here
WALRF vs AAUKF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $28.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check AAUKF's competition here
WALRF vs NGLOY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check NGLOY's competition here
WALRF vs CMCLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check CMCLF's competition here
WALRF vs TCKRF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 99.39. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check TCKRF's competition here
WALRF vs IVPAF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check IVPAF's competition here
WALRF vs IPOAF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPOAF's competition here
WALRF vs BOLIF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
WALRF vs BDNNY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $63.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check BDNNY's competition here
WALRF vs JXMNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check JXMNF's competition here
WALRF vs SHTLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
WALRF vs ABML Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ABML's competition here
WALRF vs LYSCF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 172.75. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check LYSCF's competition here
WALRF vs LYSDY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check LYSDY's competition here
WALRF vs STMNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
WALRF vs SMMYY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.20. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check SMMYY's competition here
WALRF vs PUTKY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PUTKY's competition here
WALRF vs PUTKF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
WALRF vs NILSY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
WALRF vs PAEKY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
WALRF vs MALRY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MALRY's competition here
WALRF vs PILBF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PILBF's competition here
WALRF vs MALRF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
WALRF vs FLMMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check FLMMF's competition here
WALRF vs NGXXF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -50.14. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check NGXXF's competition here
WALRF vs IIDDY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
WALRF vs CHZQ Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
WALRF vs IPGDF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check IPGDF's competition here
WALRF vs PTNDY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PTNDY's competition here
WALRF vs MIMTF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MIMTF's competition here
WALRF vs DWMNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
WALRF vs NICMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
WALRF vs AZZVF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
WALRF vs AFBOF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check AFBOF's competition here
WALRF vs ERMAF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 109.60. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ERMAF's competition here
WALRF vs ERMAY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 105.33. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
WALRF vs SOUHY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.77. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check SOUHY's competition here
WALRF vs PTNDF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PTNDF's competition here
WALRF vs ILKAF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and ILKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAF's competition here
WALRF vs TAOFF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check TAOFF's competition here
WALRF vs ILKAY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ILKAY's competition here
WALRF vs DETRF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check DETRF's competition here
WALRF vs ADTLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ADTLF's competition here
WALRF vs ADMLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ADMLF's competition here
WALRF vs LINRF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.40. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check LINRF's competition here
WALRF vs AZRMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
WALRF vs MFRVF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MFRVF's competition here
WALRF vs FMCXF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 986.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check FMCXF's competition here
WALRF vs ATUSF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 974.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ATUSF's competition here
WALRF vs AMVMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 941.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -76.79. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check AMVMF's competition here
WALRF vs STTSY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check STTSY's competition here
WALRF vs AFMJF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 876.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check AFMJF's competition here
WALRF vs ALMTF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ALMTF's competition here
WALRF vs AUSDF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check AUSDF's competition here
WALRF vs CTJHF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check CTJHF's competition here
WALRF vs CREQF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while CREQF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check CREQF's competition here
WALRF vs NCKAF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check NCKAF's competition here
WALRF vs MJDLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MJDLF's competition here
WALRF vs VULNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
WALRF vs BQSSF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 500M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check BQSSF's competition here
WALRF vs FGOVF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -94.05. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check FGOVF's competition here
WALRF vs TTNNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check TTNNF's competition here
WALRF vs PTTMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PTTMF's competition here
WALRF vs OSTTF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check OSTTF's competition here
WALRF vs REEMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 474.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check REEMF's competition here
WALRF vs MCRZF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MCRZF's competition here
WALRF vs PMETF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 453.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PMETF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -93.07. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PMETF's competition here
WALRF vs MNXMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 452.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.25. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MNXMF's competition here
WALRF vs BIRNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check BIRNF's competition here
WALRF vs SLGGF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 424.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check SLGGF's competition here
WALRF vs CGMLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check CGMLF's competition here
WALRF vs KMRPF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check KMRPF's competition here
WALRF vs VTMXF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, VTMXF has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while VTMXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VTMXF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VTMXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and VTMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMXF's competition here
WALRF vs NQMIY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
WALRF vs MLYF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MLYF's competition here
WALRF vs PXMFF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMFF's competition here
WALRF vs MLXEF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MLXEF's competition here
WALRF vs CTJHY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHY's competition here
WALRF vs FWEDF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 342.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check FWEDF's competition here
WALRF vs MCHHF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
WALRF vs ERLFF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.56. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ERLFF's competition here
WALRF vs RTLGF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while RTLGF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check RTLGF's competition here
WALRF vs ARAFF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 320.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check ARAFF's competition here
WALRF vs SVMLF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check SVMLF's competition here
WALRF vs BSSMF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
WALRF vs SRHYY Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SRHYY trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check SRHYY's competition here
WALRF vs PRMNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while PRMNF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check PRMNF's competition here
WALRF vs LTSRF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check LTSRF's competition here
WALRF vs SYAAF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while SYAAF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and SYAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYAAF's competition here
WALRF vs LRSRF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check LRSRF's competition here
WALRF vs STQNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STQNF's competition here
WALRF vs MGMNF Comparison July 2025
WALRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WALRF stands at 324.1K. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WALRF is priced at $0.01, while MGMNF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WALRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, WALRF's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WALRF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALRF.Check MGMNF's competition here