Fortescue Metals Group Limited (FSUMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $15.00 | +0.42% | 46.2B | 12.40 | $1.21 | +5.50% |
| BHPLF | $45.50 | +3.92% | 231.2B | 22.64 | $2.01 | +2.92% |
| RTNTF | $130.11 | +0.00% | 211.4B | 21.36 | $6.09 | +3.09% |
| RTPPF | $105.78 | -2.90% | 171.9B | 17.40 | $6.08 | +3.80% |
| GLCNF | $7.91 | -3.02% | 92.5B | 263.50 | $0.03 | +1.70% |
| GMBXF | $11.78 | -8.47% | 91.7B | 16.59 | $0.71 | +2.85% |
| GLNCY | $15.56 | -5.01% | 91B | 258.83 | $0.06 | +1.73% |
| AAUKF | $53.84 | -1.56% | 57.7B | -51.28 | -$1.05 | +0.43% |
| CMCLF | $2.36 | -2.68% | 56.8B | 16.84 | $0.14 | +1.77% |
| NGLOY | $25.44 | -7.96% | 54.5B | -47.96 | -$0.53 | +0.45% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 231.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while BHPLF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BHPLF's competition here
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 211.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while RTNTF trades at $130.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RTNTF's competition here
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 171.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while RTPPF trades at $105.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RTPPF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while GLCNF trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is 263.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLCNF's competition here
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while GMBXF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GMBXF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while GLNCY trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is 258.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLNCY's competition here
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AAUKF trades at $53.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -51.28. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AAUKF's competition here
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while CMCLF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CMCLF's competition here
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NGLOY trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -47.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGLOY's competition here
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while FSUGY trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FSUGY's competition here
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while TCKRF trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TCKRF's competition here
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while IPOAF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IPOAF's competition here
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while BDNNY trades at $113.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BDNNY's competition here
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while STMNF trades at $58.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check STMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while SHTLF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SHTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while SOUHY trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SOUHY's competition here
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while SMMYY trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SMMYY's competition here
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PILBF trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -202.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PILBF's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while LYSCF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 208.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSCF's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while LYSDY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 206.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSDY's competition here
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while IVPAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 88.61. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IVPAF's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MALRF trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MALRF's competition here
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BOLIF's competition here
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check STTSY's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MALRY trades at $46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MALRY's competition here
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ABML's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PUTKF's competition here
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while IPGDF trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -35.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IPGDF's competition here
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NILSY's competition here
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while IIDDY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IIDDY's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PUTKY trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PUTKY's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PTNDF's competition here
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while LINRF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LINRF's competition here
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MIMTF trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MIMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PAEKY's competition here
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NGXXF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.61. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while DWMNF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DWMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PTNDY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PTNDY's competition here
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MFRVF's competition here
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NICMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -71.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NICMF's competition here
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FLMMF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AFBOF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFBOF's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ILKAY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ILKAY's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ILKAF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ILKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while FMCXF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FMCXF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AZZVF's competition here
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while DETRF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DETRF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ERMAY trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAY's competition here
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ATUSF trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ATUSF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ERMAF trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTTMF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PTTMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PTTMF's competition here
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while TAOFF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TAOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AUSDF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AUSDF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ADMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NCKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ADTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AFMJF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFMJF's competition here
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while TTNNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 70.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TTNNF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCHHF's competition here
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SLGGF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AZRMF's competition here
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MNXMF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MNXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 985.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MJDLF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MJDLF's competition here
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 973.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MLXEF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLXEF's competition here
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ALMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 863.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PXMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PXMFF's competition here
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 841.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PMETF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -229.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PMETF's competition here
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BIRNF's competition here
FSUMF vs OMZNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 706.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while OMZNF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check OMZNF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 668.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ARAAF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -76.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAAF's competition here
FSUMF vs NTCPF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 649.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NTCPF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -39.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NTCPF's competition here
FSUMF vs CXOXF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 628.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while CXOXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -19.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CXOXF's competition here
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 598M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while OSTTF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check OSTTF's competition here
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 595.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check VULNF's competition here
FSUMF vs CTJHF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while CTJHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CTJHF's competition here
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 577.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while FWEDF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FWEDF's competition here
FSUMF vs CHXMF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while CHXMF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CHXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs MRRDF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 503.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MRRDF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MRRDF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAFF's competition here
FSUMF vs ECRAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ECRAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ECRAF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCRZF's competition here
FSUMF vs DBLVF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, DBLVF has a market cap of 455M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while DBLVF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas DBLVF's P/E ratio is -202.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBLVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DBLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DBLVF's competition here
FSUMF vs UURAF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 448.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while UURAF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check UURAF's competition here
FSUMF vs PRMNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PRMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -73.98. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FGOVF's competition here
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while BQSSF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BQSSF's competition here
FSUMF vs TLOFF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 414.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while TLOFF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is -220.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TLOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 393.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while JMXXF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check JMXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CGMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NQMIY's competition here
FSUMF vs GLNLF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, GLNLF has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while GLNLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GLNLF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLNLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GLNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLNLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AUMTF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AUMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLYF's competition here
FSUMF vs MGMNF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 368.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while MGMNF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MGMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs BENZF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while BENZF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BENZF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 360.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -28.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERLFF's competition here
FSUMF vs QUEXF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, QUEXF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while QUEXF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas QUEXF's P/E ratio is -213.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QUEXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to QUEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check QUEXF's competition here
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while CTJHY trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CTJHY's competition here
FSUMF vs RGLSF Comparison June 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 46.2B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 344M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $15.00, while RGLSF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -91.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RGLSF's competition here