Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited (FSUMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $14.85 | -4.13% | 45.6B | 12.24 | $1.21 | +5.62% |
| RTNTF | $126.50 | +0.00% | 205.6B | 20.81 | $6.08 | +3.18% |
| BHPLF | $39.82 | -0.63% | 202.3B | 19.81 | $2.01 | +3.34% |
| RTPPF | $99.50 | +1.57% | 161.7B | 16.37 | $6.08 | +4.04% |
| GMBXF | $11.70 | +3.33% | 91.1B | 18.00 | $0.65 | +2.60% |
| GLNCY | $15.06 | +0.74% | 89.6B | 251.50 | $0.06 | +1.33% |
| GLCNF | $7.50 | -3.35% | 87.7B | 250.00 | $0.03 | +1.33% |
| CMCLF | $2.44 | +2.31% | 55B | 18.36 | $0.14 | +1.38% |
| NGLOY | $25.27 | -0.39% | 54.5B | -47.60 | -$0.53 | +0.45% |
| AAUKF | $50.22 | +0.93% | 53.8B | -47.83 | -$1.05 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while RTNTF trades at $126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RTNTF's competition here
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 202.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while BHPLF trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BHPLF's competition here
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while RTPPF trades at $99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RTPPF's competition here
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while GMBXF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GMBXF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while GLNCY trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is 251.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLNCY's competition here
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while GLCNF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLCNF's competition here
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while CMCLF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CMCLF's competition here
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NGLOY trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -47.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGLOY's competition here
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AAUKF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -47.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AAUKF's competition here
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while FSUGY trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FSUGY's competition here
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while TCKRF trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TCKRF's competition here
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while IPOAF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IPOAF's competition here
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while STMNF trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 113.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check STMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while SMMYY trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 108.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SMMYY's competition here
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while BDNNY trades at $116.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BDNNY's competition here
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while SHTLF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SHTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while SOUHY trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SOUHY's competition here
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PILBF trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -204.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PILBF's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while LYSCF trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 217.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSCF's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while LYSDY trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 217.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSDY's competition here
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while IVPAF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IVPAF's competition here
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BOLIF's competition here
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check STTSY's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MALRY trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MALRY's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MALRF trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MALRF's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PUTKY trades at $37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PUTKY's competition here
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ABML's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PUTKF's competition here
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while LINRF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LINRF's competition here
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while IPGDF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IPGDF's competition here
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NILSY's competition here
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NGXXF trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -44.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MIMTF trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MIMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while IIDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -26.54. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IIDDY's competition here
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PAEKY's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PTNDF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PTNDF's competition here
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while DWMNF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DWMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MFRVF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MFRVF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PTNDY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PTNDY's competition here
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NICMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -71.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NICMF's competition here
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FLMMF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AFBOF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFBOF's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ILKAF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ILKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ILKAY trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ILKAY's competition here
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while FMCXF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FMCXF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AZZVF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ERMAY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAY's competition here
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ATUSF trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ATUSF's competition here
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AUSDF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AUSDF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTTMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PTTMF's competition here
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while DETRF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DETRF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ERMAF trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ADMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AMVMF trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -76.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AMVMF's competition here
FSUMF vs SYAXF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while SYAXF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SYAXF's competition here
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NCKAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NCKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ADTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AFMJF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFMJF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MCHHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCHHF's competition here
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SLGGF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AZRMF's competition here
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while TTNNF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TTNNF's competition here
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while TAOFF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TAOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MNXMF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -155.78. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MNXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 988.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MJDLF trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 92.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MJDLF's competition here
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PXMFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PXMFF's competition here
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 882M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MLXEF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLXEF's competition here
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ALMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs NTCPF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 750M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NTCPF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -56.52. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NTCPF's competition here
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while FWEDF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FWEDF's competition here
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BIRNF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 711.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ARAAF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -80.87. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAAF's competition here
FSUMF vs OMZNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while OMZNF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -19.28. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check OMZNF's competition here
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 694.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PMETF trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -189.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PMETF's competition here
FSUMF vs CXOXF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 674M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while CXOXF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -23.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CXOXF's competition here
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while VULNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check VULNF's competition here
FSUMF vs GDQMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 625.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while GDQMF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -165.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GDQMF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 625.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ARAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -25.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAFF's competition here
FSUMF vs CTJHF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while CTJHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CTJHF's competition here
FSUMF vs TLOFF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 555M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while TLOFF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is -147.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TLOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs MRRDF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MRRDF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -26.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MRRDF's competition here
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while OSTTF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check OSTTF's competition here
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 511.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while FGOVF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -88.57. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FGOVF's competition here
FSUMF vs CHXMF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 491M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while CHXMF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CHXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 473.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while BQSSF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BQSSF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLNLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, GLNLF has a market cap of 471.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while GLNLF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GLNLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLNLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLNLF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCRZF's competition here
FSUMF vs ECRAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ECRAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ECRAF's competition here
FSUMF vs BENZF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while BENZF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -22.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BENZF's competition here
FSUMF vs UURAF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 457.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while UURAF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check UURAF's competition here
FSUMF vs DBLVF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, DBLVF has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while DBLVF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DBLVF's P/E ratio is -195.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBLVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DBLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DBLVF's competition here
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while CGMLF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CGMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs PRMNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PRMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs MGMNF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MGMNF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MGMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NQMIY's competition here
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 377.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while JMXXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check JMXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs RGLSF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while RGLSF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -149.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RGLSF's competition here
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLYF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison April 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 373.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.85, while ERLFF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERLFF's competition here