PT Aneka Tambang Tbk
PT Aneka Tambang Tbk (PAEKY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAEKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAEKY | $16.17 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 8.79 | $1.84 | +5.77% |
| RTNTF | $126.50 | +0.00% | 205.6B | 20.81 | $6.08 | +3.18% |
| BHPLF | $39.82 | -0.63% | 202.3B | 19.81 | $2.01 | +3.34% |
| RTPPF | $99.50 | +1.57% | 161.7B | 16.37 | $6.08 | +4.04% |
| GMBXF | $11.70 | +3.33% | 91.1B | 18.00 | $0.65 | +2.60% |
| GLNCY | $15.06 | +0.74% | 89.6B | 251.50 | $0.06 | +1.33% |
| GLCNF | $7.50 | -3.35% | 87.7B | 250.00 | $0.03 | +1.33% |
| CMCLF | $2.44 | +2.31% | 55B | 18.36 | $0.14 | +1.38% |
| NGLOY | $25.27 | -0.39% | 54.5B | -47.60 | -$0.53 | +0.45% |
| AAUKF | $50.22 | +0.93% | 53.8B | -47.83 | -$1.05 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
PAEKY vs RTNTF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while RTNTF trades at $126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check RTNTF's competition here
PAEKY vs BHPLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 202.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while BHPLF trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check BHPLF's competition here
PAEKY vs RTPPF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while RTPPF trades at $99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check RTPPF's competition here
PAEKY vs GMBXF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while GMBXF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check GMBXF's competition here
PAEKY vs GLNCY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while GLNCY trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is 251.50. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check GLNCY's competition here
PAEKY vs GLCNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while GLCNF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check GLCNF's competition here
PAEKY vs CMCLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while CMCLF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check CMCLF's competition here
PAEKY vs NGLOY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NGLOY trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -47.60. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NGLOY's competition here
PAEKY vs AAUKF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AAUKF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -47.83. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AAUKF's competition here
PAEKY vs FSUMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while FSUMF trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check FSUMF's competition here
PAEKY vs FSUGY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while FSUGY trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check FSUGY's competition here
PAEKY vs TCKRF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while TCKRF trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check TCKRF's competition here
PAEKY vs IPOAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while IPOAF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check IPOAF's competition here
PAEKY vs STMNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while STMNF trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 113.12. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check STMNF's competition here
PAEKY vs SMMYY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while SMMYY trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 108.71. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check SMMYY's competition here
PAEKY vs BDNNY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while BDNNY trades at $116.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check BDNNY's competition here
PAEKY vs SHTLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while SHTLF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check SHTLF's competition here
PAEKY vs SOUHY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while SOUHY trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.03. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check SOUHY's competition here
PAEKY vs PILBF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PILBF trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -204.50. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PILBF's competition here
PAEKY vs LYSCF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while LYSCF trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 217.50. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check LYSCF's competition here
PAEKY vs LYSDY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while LYSDY trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 217.46. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check LYSDY's competition here
PAEKY vs IVPAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while IVPAF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check IVPAF's competition here
PAEKY vs BOLIF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check BOLIF's competition here
PAEKY vs STTSY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check STTSY's competition here
PAEKY vs MALRY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MALRY trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MALRY's competition here
PAEKY vs MALRF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MALRF trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MALRF's competition here
PAEKY vs PUTKY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PUTKY trades at $37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PUTKY's competition here
PAEKY vs ABML Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ABML's competition here
PAEKY vs PUTKF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PUTKF's competition here
PAEKY vs LINRF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while LINRF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check LINRF's competition here
PAEKY vs IPGDF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while IPGDF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check IPGDF's competition here
PAEKY vs NILSY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NILSY's competition here
PAEKY vs NGXXF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NGXXF trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -44.71. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NGXXF's competition here
PAEKY vs MIMTF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MIMTF trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MIMTF's competition here
PAEKY vs IIDDY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while IIDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -26.54. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check IIDDY's competition here
PAEKY vs PTNDF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PTNDF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PTNDF's competition here
PAEKY vs DWMNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while DWMNF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check DWMNF's competition here
PAEKY vs MFRVF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MFRVF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MFRVF's competition here
PAEKY vs PTNDY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PTNDY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PTNDY's competition here
PAEKY vs NICMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NICMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -71.73. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NICMF's competition here
PAEKY vs FLMMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check FLMMF's competition here
PAEKY vs AFBOF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AFBOF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AFBOF's competition here
PAEKY vs ILKAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ILKAF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ILKAF's competition here
PAEKY vs ILKAY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ILKAY trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ILKAY's competition here
PAEKY vs FMCXF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while FMCXF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check FMCXF's competition here
PAEKY vs AZZVF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AZZVF's competition here
PAEKY vs ERMAY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ERMAY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ERMAY's competition here
PAEKY vs ATUSF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ATUSF trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ATUSF's competition here
PAEKY vs AUSDF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AUSDF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AUSDF's competition here
PAEKY vs PTTMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PTTMF's competition here
PAEKY vs DETRF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while DETRF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check DETRF's competition here
PAEKY vs ERMAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ERMAF trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ERMAF's competition here
PAEKY vs ADMLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ADMLF's competition here
PAEKY vs AMVMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AMVMF trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -76.91. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AMVMF's competition here
PAEKY vs SYAXF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while SYAXF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check SYAXF's competition here
PAEKY vs NCKAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NCKAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NCKAF's competition here
PAEKY vs ADTLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ADTLF's competition here
PAEKY vs AFMJF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AFMJF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AFMJF's competition here
PAEKY vs MCHHF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MCHHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MCHHF's competition here
PAEKY vs SLGGF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check SLGGF's competition here
PAEKY vs AZRMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check AZRMF's competition here
PAEKY vs TTNNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while TTNNF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check TTNNF's competition here
PAEKY vs TAOFF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while TAOFF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check TAOFF's competition here
PAEKY vs MNXMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MNXMF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -155.78. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MNXMF's competition here
PAEKY vs MJDLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 988.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MJDLF trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 92.62. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MJDLF's competition here
PAEKY vs PXMFF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PXMFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PXMFF's competition here
PAEKY vs MLXEF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 882M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MLXEF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MLXEF's competition here
PAEKY vs ALMTF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ALMTF's competition here
PAEKY vs NTCPF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 750M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NTCPF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -56.52. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NTCPF's competition here
PAEKY vs FWEDF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while FWEDF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check FWEDF's competition here
PAEKY vs BIRNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check BIRNF's competition here
PAEKY vs ARAAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 711.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ARAAF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -80.87. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ARAAF's competition here
PAEKY vs OMZNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while OMZNF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -19.28. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check OMZNF's competition here
PAEKY vs PMETF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 694.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PMETF trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -189.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PMETF's competition here
PAEKY vs CXOXF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 674M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while CXOXF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -23.11. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check CXOXF's competition here
PAEKY vs VULNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while VULNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check VULNF's competition here
PAEKY vs GDQMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 625.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while GDQMF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -165.50. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check GDQMF's competition here
PAEKY vs ARAFF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 625.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ARAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -25.30. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ARAFF's competition here
PAEKY vs CTJHF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while CTJHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check CTJHF's competition here
PAEKY vs TLOFF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 555M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while TLOFF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is -147.75. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check TLOFF's competition here
PAEKY vs MRRDF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MRRDF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -26.32. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MRRDF's competition here
PAEKY vs OSTTF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while OSTTF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check OSTTF's competition here
PAEKY vs FGOVF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 511.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while FGOVF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -88.57. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check FGOVF's competition here
PAEKY vs CHXMF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 491M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while CHXMF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check CHXMF's competition here
PAEKY vs BQSSF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 473.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while BQSSF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check BQSSF's competition here
PAEKY vs GLNLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GLNLF has a market cap of 471.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while GLNLF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas GLNLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLNLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to GLNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check GLNLF's competition here
PAEKY vs MCRZF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MCRZF's competition here
PAEKY vs ECRAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ECRAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ECRAF's competition here
PAEKY vs BENZF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while BENZF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -22.86. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check BENZF's competition here
PAEKY vs UURAF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 457.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while UURAF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check UURAF's competition here
PAEKY vs DBLVF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBLVF has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while DBLVF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas DBLVF's P/E ratio is -195.40. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DBLVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to DBLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check DBLVF's competition here
PAEKY vs CGMLF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while CGMLF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check CGMLF's competition here
PAEKY vs PRMNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check PRMNF's competition here
PAEKY vs MGMNF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MGMNF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MGMNF's competition here
PAEKY vs NQMIY Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check NQMIY's competition here
PAEKY vs JMXXF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 377.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while JMXXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check JMXXF's competition here
PAEKY vs RGLSF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while RGLSF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -149.75. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check RGLSF's competition here
PAEKY vs MLYF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check MLYF's competition here
PAEKY vs ERLFF Comparison April 2026
PAEKY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAEKY stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 373.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAEKY is priced at $16.17, while ERLFF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAEKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, PAEKY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAEKY is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAEKY.Check ERLFF's competition here