American Battery Technology Company
American Battery Technology Company (ABML) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABML | $9.83 | +1344.53% | 6.7B | -22.34 | -$0.44 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $42.50 | -6.63% | 215.9B | 21.14 | $2.01 | +3.13% |
| RTNTF | $125.94 | +0.00% | 204.6B | 20.71 | $6.08 | +3.19% |
| RTPPF | $103.50 | -5.48% | 164.4B | 16.62 | $6.09 | +3.97% |
| GMBXF | $11.99 | -2.52% | 96.9B | 17.54 | $0.71 | +2.42% |
| GLNCY | $15.24 | -4.27% | 89.4B | 254.33 | $0.06 | +1.77% |
| GLCNF | $7.64 | -3.83% | 89.4B | 254.73 | $0.03 | +1.78% |
| CMCLF | $2.49 | -0.40% | 60B | 17.79 | $0.14 | +1.37% |
| NGLOY | $25.68 | -5.80% | 55.3B | -49.31 | -$0.52 | +0.45% |
| AAUKF | $49.99 | -6.80% | 53.6B | -47.61 | -$1.05 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
ABML vs BHPLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 215.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while BHPLF trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check BHPLF's competition here
ABML vs RTNTF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 204.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while RTNTF trades at $125.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check RTNTF's competition here
ABML vs RTPPF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while RTPPF trades at $103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check RTPPF's competition here
ABML vs GMBXF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while GMBXF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check GMBXF's competition here
ABML vs GLNCY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while GLNCY trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is 254.33. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check GLNCY's competition here
ABML vs GLCNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while GLCNF trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is 254.73. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check GLCNF's competition here
ABML vs CMCLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while CMCLF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check CMCLF's competition here
ABML vs NGLOY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NGLOY trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -49.31. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NGLOY's competition here
ABML vs AAUKF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AAUKF trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -47.61. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AAUKF's competition here
ABML vs FSUMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while FSUMF trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check FSUMF's competition here
ABML vs FSUGY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while FSUGY trades at $32.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check FSUGY's competition here
ABML vs TCKRF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while TCKRF trades at $65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check TCKRF's competition here
ABML vs IPOAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while IPOAF trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check IPOAF's competition here
ABML vs STMNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while STMNF trades at $70.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check STMNF's competition here
ABML vs SMMYY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while SMMYY trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check SMMYY's competition here
ABML vs BDNNY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while BDNNY trades at $108.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check BDNNY's competition here
ABML vs PILBF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PILBF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -225.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PILBF's competition here
ABML vs SHTLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while SHTLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check SHTLF's competition here
ABML vs SOUHY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while SOUHY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 33.59. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check SOUHY's competition here
ABML vs LYSDY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while LYSDY trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 213.33. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check LYSDY's competition here
ABML vs LYSCF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while LYSCF trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 212.84. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check LYSCF's competition here
ABML vs IVPAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while IVPAF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check IVPAF's competition here
ABML vs BOLIF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check BOLIF's competition here
ABML vs STTSY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check STTSY's competition here
ABML vs MALRY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MALRY trades at $45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MALRY's competition here
ABML vs MALRF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MALRF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MALRF's competition here
ABML vs PUTKF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PUTKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PUTKF's competition here
ABML vs LINRF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while LINRF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check LINRF's competition here
ABML vs PUTKY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PUTKY trades at $30.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PUTKY's competition here
ABML vs IPGDF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while IPGDF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check IPGDF's competition here
ABML vs NILSY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NILSY's competition here
ABML vs MIMTF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MIMTF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MIMTF's competition here
ABML vs NGXXF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NGXXF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -41.47. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NGXXF's competition here
ABML vs PTNDF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PTNDF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PTNDF's competition here
ABML vs IIDDY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while IIDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -25.87. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check IIDDY's competition here
ABML vs PAEKY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PAEKY's competition here
ABML vs DWMNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while DWMNF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check DWMNF's competition here
ABML vs NICMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NICMF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NICMF's competition here
ABML vs PTNDY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PTNDY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PTNDY's competition here
ABML vs MFRVF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MFRVF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MFRVF's competition here
ABML vs FLMMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check FLMMF's competition here
ABML vs AFBOF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AFBOF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AFBOF's competition here
ABML vs ILKAY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ILKAY trades at $28.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ILKAY's competition here
ABML vs ILKAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ILKAF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ILKAF's competition here
ABML vs FMCXF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while FMCXF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check FMCXF's competition here
ABML vs AZZVF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AZZVF's competition here
ABML vs ERMAY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ERMAY trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ERMAY's competition here
ABML vs DETRF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while DETRF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check DETRF's competition here
ABML vs ATUSF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ATUSF trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ATUSF's competition here
ABML vs PTTMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PTTMF's competition here
ABML vs ERMAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ERMAF trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ERMAF's competition here
ABML vs ADMLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ADMLF's competition here
ABML vs TAOFF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while TAOFF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -20.24. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check TAOFF's competition here
ABML vs TTNNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while TTNNF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 79.27. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check TTNNF's competition here
ABML vs AUSDF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AUSDF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AUSDF's competition here
ABML vs NCKAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NCKAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NCKAF's competition here
ABML vs ADTLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ADTLF's competition here
ABML vs AFMJF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AFMJF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AFMJF's competition here
ABML vs MCHHF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MCHHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MCHHF's competition here
ABML vs SLGGF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check SLGGF's competition here
ABML vs AZRMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AZRMF's competition here
ABML vs MNXMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MNXMF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -162.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MNXMF's competition here
ABML vs MLXEF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MLXEF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MLXEF's competition here
ABML vs MJDLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 963.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MJDLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 90.23. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MJDLF's competition here
ABML vs PMETF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 907.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PMETF trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -247.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PMETF's competition here
ABML vs PXMFF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 892.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PXMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PXMFF's competition here
ABML vs ALMTF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ALMTF's competition here
ABML vs CXOXF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 841.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while CXOXF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check CXOXF's competition here
ABML vs BIRNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check BIRNF's competition here
ABML vs ARAAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 731.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ARAAF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -83.16. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ARAAF's competition here
ABML vs OMZNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 730.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while OMZNF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check OMZNF's competition here
ABML vs NTCPF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 713.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NTCPF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NTCPF's competition here
ABML vs FWEDF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 668.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while FWEDF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check FWEDF's competition here
ABML vs VULNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 628M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while VULNF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check VULNF's competition here
ABML vs MRRDF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 598.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MRRDF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -30.44. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MRRDF's competition here
ABML vs ARAFF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 569.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ARAFF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -23.05. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ARAFF's competition here
ABML vs CHXMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 561.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while CHXMF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check CHXMF's competition here
ABML vs CTJHF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while CTJHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check CTJHF's competition here
ABML vs OSTTF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while OSTTF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check OSTTF's competition here
ABML vs ECRAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 484.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ECRAF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ECRAF's competition here
ABML vs MCRZF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MCRZF's competition here
ABML vs FGOVF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while FGOVF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -79.24. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check FGOVF's competition here
ABML vs GLNLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GLNLF has a market cap of 452.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while GLNLF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas GLNLF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to GLNLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to GLNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check GLNLF's competition here
ABML vs BENZF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while BENZF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -22.14. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check BENZF's competition here
ABML vs CGMLF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 447.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while CGMLF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check CGMLF's competition here
ABML vs MGMNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 445.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MGMNF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MGMNF's competition here
ABML vs UURAF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 445.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while UURAF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check UURAF's competition here
ABML vs TLOFF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while TLOFF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is -118.37. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check TLOFF's competition here
ABML vs DBLVF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DBLVF has a market cap of 439.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while DBLVF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas DBLVF's P/E ratio is -195.20. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to DBLVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to DBLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check DBLVF's competition here
ABML vs PRMNF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check PRMNF's competition here
ABML vs CREQF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 418.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while CREQF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check CREQF's competition here
ABML vs AUMTF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while AUMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check AUMTF's competition here
ABML vs BQSSF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 395.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while BQSSF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check BQSSF's competition here
ABML vs JMXXF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 393.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while JMXXF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check JMXXF's competition here
ABML vs NQMIY Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check NQMIY's competition here
ABML vs MLYF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check MLYF's competition here
ABML vs RGLSF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while RGLSF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -149.00. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check RGLSF's competition here
ABML vs ERLFF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while ERLFF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.68. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check ERLFF's competition here
ABML vs REEMF Comparison May 2026
ABML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABML stands at 6.7B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABML is priced at $9.83, while REEMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABML currently has a P/E ratio of -22.34, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, ABML's ROE is -0.87%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABML is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABML.Check REEMF's competition here