Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB | $255.29 | -1.88% | 43.3B | 36.12 | $7.07 | +0.41% |
| UNP | $271.56 | -1.30% | 161.2B | 22.33 | $12.16 | +2.00% |
| CSX | $46.08 | -0.26% | 85.6B | 28.27 | $1.63 | +1.14% |
| CP | $86.13 | -0.10% | 76.5B | 26.34 | $3.27 | +0.76% |
| NSC | $318.20 | -0.59% | 71.5B | 26.78 | $11.88 | +1.69% |
| CNI | $113.20 | +0.51% | 69.2B | 20.47 | $5.53 | +2.30% |
| TRN | $33.23 | -3.03% | 2.6B | 10.48 | $3.17 | +3.66% |
| GBX | $47.67 | -0.65% | 1.5B | 10.17 | $4.69 | +2.72% |
| FSTR | $37.42 | -4.93% | 391.4M | 36.33 | $1.03 | N/A |
| RAIL | $7.55 | -2.33% | 145.1M | 10.49 | $0.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WAB vs UNP Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while UNP trades at $271.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check UNP's competition here
WAB vs CSX Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while CSX trades at $46.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB and CSX have similar daily volatility (1.78).Check CSX's competition here
WAB vs CP Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while CP trades at $86.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check CP's competition here
WAB vs NSC Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while NSC trades at $318.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check NSC's competition here
WAB vs CNI Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while CNI trades at $113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check CNI's competition here
WAB vs TRN Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, TRN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while TRN trades at $33.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas TRN's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to TRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check TRN's competition here
WAB vs GBX Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while GBX trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check GBX's competition here
WAB vs FSTR Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 391.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while FSTR trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check FSTR's competition here
WAB vs RAIL Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while RAIL trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAIL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check RAIL's competition here
WAB vs RVSN Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while RVSN trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check RVSN's competition here
WAB vs KIQ Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check KIQ's competition here
WAB vs RVSNW Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while RVSNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check RVSNW's competition here
WAB vs BNI Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, BNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while BNI trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas BNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to BNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check BNI's competition here
WAB vs KSU Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check KSU's competition here
WAB vs PRL Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, PRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while PRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas PRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to PRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check PRL's competition here
WAB vs PWX Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, PWX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while PWX trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas PWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to PWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check PWX's competition here
WAB vs KSU-P Comparison May 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 43.3B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $255.29, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 36.12, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check KSU-P's competition here