Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $34.12 | +0.71% | 2.7B | 10.66 | $3.20 | +3.58% |
| UNP | $282.25 | +1.63% | 167.6B | 23.72 | $11.90 | +1.96% |
| CSX | $48.89 | +1.16% | 90.8B | 28.76 | $1.70 | +1.10% |
| CP | $87.79 | +2.18% | 77.9B | 26.44 | $3.32 | +0.78% |
| CNI | $121.56 | +1.45% | 73.7B | 22.18 | $5.48 | +2.15% |
| NSC | $322.71 | +1.17% | 72.5B | 25.90 | $12.46 | +1.67% |
| WAB | $262.19 | -0.69% | 44.5B | 28.84 | $9.09 | +0.43% |
| GBX | $47.54 | -0.71% | 1.5B | 13.70 | $3.47 | +2.73% |
| FSTR | $42.76 | -2.99% | 447.2M | 41.51 | $1.03 | N/A |
| RAIL | $8.97 | -6.56% | 172.4M | 19.09 | $0.47 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while UNP trades at $282.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check UNP's competition here
TRN vs CSX Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while CSX trades at $48.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CSX's competition here
TRN vs CP Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while CP trades at $87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CP's competition here
TRN vs CNI Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while CNI trades at $121.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CNI's competition here
TRN vs NSC Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while NSC trades at $322.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check NSC's competition here
TRN vs WAB Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while WAB trades at $262.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check WAB's competition here
TRN vs GBX Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while GBX trades at $47.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check GBX's competition here
TRN vs FSTR Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 447.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while FSTR trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check FSTR's competition here
TRN vs RAIL Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while RAIL trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RAIL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RAIL's competition here
TRN vs KIQ Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KIQ's competition here
TRN vs RVSN Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while RVSN trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSN's competition here
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while RVSNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSNW's competition here
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU-P's competition here
TRN vs KSU Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU's competition here
TRN vs PRL Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while PRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas PRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to PRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check PRL's competition here
TRN vs PWX Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PWX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while PWX trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas PWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to PWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check PWX's competition here
TRN vs BNI Comparison July 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $34.12, while BNI trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BNI's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to BNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check BNI's competition here