Trinity Industries, Inc.
Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $31.46 | -0.91% | 2.5B | 10.06 | $3.14 | +3.87% |
| UNP | $269.98 | +0.48% | 159.7B | 22.14 | $12.15 | +2.04% |
| CSX | $45.44 | +0.06% | 84.5B | 27.89 | $1.63 | +1.16% |
| CP | $87.39 | +0.57% | 78.4B | 26.48 | $3.30 | +0.76% |
| NSC | $319.79 | +0.02% | 71.6B | 26.89 | $11.86 | +1.69% |
| CNI | $115.42 | +0.72% | 70.3B | 20.75 | $5.54 | +2.26% |
| WAB | $263.78 | -1.23% | 45.3B | 37.74 | $7.08 | +0.39% |
| GBX | $48.84 | -0.91% | 1.5B | 10.46 | $4.69 | +2.67% |
| FSTR | $31.88 | -0.48% | 332.5M | 46.07 | $0.69 | N/A |
| RAIL | $8.62 | -1.54% | 168.1M | 8.05 | $1.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 159.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while UNP trades at $269.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check UNP's competition here
TRN vs CSX Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while CSX trades at $45.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CSX's competition here
TRN vs CP Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while CP trades at $87.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CP's competition here
TRN vs NSC Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while NSC trades at $319.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check NSC's competition here
TRN vs CNI Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while CNI trades at $115.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CNI's competition here
TRN vs WAB Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while WAB trades at $263.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check WAB's competition here
TRN vs GBX Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while GBX trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check GBX's competition here
TRN vs FSTR Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while FSTR trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check FSTR's competition here
TRN vs RAIL Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while RAIL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RAIL's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RAIL's competition here
TRN vs RVSN Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while RVSN trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSN's competition here
TRN vs KIQ Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KIQ's competition here
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while RVSNW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSNW's competition here
TRN vs KSU Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU's competition here
TRN vs PRL Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while PRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas PRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to PRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check PRL's competition here
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU-P's competition here
TRN vs BNI Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while BNI trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas BNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to BNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check BNI's competition here
TRN vs PWX Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PWX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $31.46, while PWX trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas PWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to PWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check PWX's competition here