Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 129.40B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while UNP trades at $216.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 69.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CP trades at $73.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 61.90B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CNI trades at $98.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 53.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CSX trades at $28.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 50.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while NSC trades at $222.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, EJPRY has a market cap of 25.61B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while EJPRY trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas EJPRY's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EJPRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to EJPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, EJPRF has a market cap of 24.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while EJPRF trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas EJPRF's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EJPRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to EJPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CJPRY has a market cap of 22.14B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CJPRY trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CJPRY's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CJPRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CJPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CJPRF has a market cap of 20.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CJPRF trades at $21.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CJPRF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CJPRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CJPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, MTCPY has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while MTCPY trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas MTCPY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTCPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to MTCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, MTRJF has a market cap of 19.58B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while MTRJF trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas MTRJF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to MTRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, VOSSY has a market cap of 14.76B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while VOSSY trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas VOSSY's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOSSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to VOSSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, ALSMY has a market cap of 11.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while ALSMY trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas ALSMY's P/E ratio is -29.87. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to ALSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, AOMFF has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while AOMFF trades at $23.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas AOMFF's P/E ratio is -30.49. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AOMFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to AOMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, WJRYY has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while WJRYY trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas WJRYY's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WJRYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to WJRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, WJRYF has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while WJRYF trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas WJRYF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WJRYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to WJRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GRPTF has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GRPTF trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GRPTF's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRPTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GRPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GRPTY has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GRPTY trades at $33.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GRPTY's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRPTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GRPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, RUMOF has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while RUMOF trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas RUMOF's P/E ratio is 45.74. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUMOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to RUMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GMXTF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GMXTF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GMXTF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMXTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to GMXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CRYYF has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CRYYF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CRYYF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRYYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to CRYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CRYCY has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CRYCY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CRYCY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRYCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CRYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, ZHUZF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while ZHUZF trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas ZHUZF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZHUZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to ZHUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, KELRF has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while KELRF trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas KELRF's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KELRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to KELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, QRNNF has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while QRNNF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas QRNNF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QRNNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to QRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, ODERF has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while ODERF trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas ODERF's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to ODERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, TBURF has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while TBURF trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas TBURF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBURF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to TBURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, BKKXF has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while BKKXF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas BKKXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKKXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to BKKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CDGLY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CDGLY trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CDGLY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDGLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to CDGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GNGYF has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GNGYF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GNGYF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNGYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GNGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, BTGRF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while BTGRF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas BTGRF's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTGRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to BTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, CDGLF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while CDGLF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas CDGLF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDGLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CDGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, SRAIF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while SRAIF trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas SRAIF's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRAIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to SRAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, TRN has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while TRN trades at $24.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas TRN's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to TRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, VOSSF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while VOSSF trades at $73.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas VOSSF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to VOSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GBX trades at $43.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, FGROY has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while FGROY trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas FGROY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGROY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to FGROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, FGROF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while FGROF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas FGROF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGROF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to FGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, JFBHF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while JFBHF trades at $182.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas JFBHF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JFBHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to JFBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, BTSGY has a market cap of 495.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while BTSGY trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas BTSGY's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTSGY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to BTSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GRPOF has a market cap of 420.75M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GRPOF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GRPOF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRPOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GRPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, ZHUZY has a market cap of 332.89M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while ZHUZY trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas ZHUZY's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZHUZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to ZHUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, GLTVF has a market cap of 320.97M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while GLTVF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas GLTVF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLTVF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to GLTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, NXPGF has a market cap of 232.93M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while NXPGF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas NXPGF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NXPGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to NXPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 219.11M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while FSTR trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 192.05M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while RAIL trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAIL's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 21.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while RVSN trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.85M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while KIQ trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while RVSNW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, AWRY has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while AWRY trades at $72.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas AWRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AWRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to AWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, DMRR has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while DMRR trades at $27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas DMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMRR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to DMRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, USDP has a market cap of 175627.00. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while USDP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas USDP's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USDP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to USDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, MAGP has a market cap of 15216.00. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while MAGP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas MAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to MAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, RLPHQ has a market cap of 9148.00. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while RLPHQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas RLPHQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLPHQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RLPHQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, URAL has a market cap of 39.00. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while URAL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas URAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to URAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to URAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, KSU-P comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, BVZHF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while BVZHF trades at $792.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas BVZHF's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BVZHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to BVZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, KSU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while KSU trades at $293.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.

WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 32.64B. In comparison, DMRRP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $190.77, while DMRRP trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.85, whereas DMRRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMRRP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to DMRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.