Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB | $236.76 | -1.50% | 40.5B | 34.61 | $6.84 | +0.44% |
| UNP | $242.44 | -0.68% | 143.8B | 20.23 | $11.98 | +2.26% |
| CSX | $39.30 | +0.20% | 73.1B | 25.52 | $1.54 | +1.35% |
| CP | $81.36 | +0.23% | 73.1B | 24.51 | $3.32 | +0.77% |
| NSC | $289.37 | -0.65% | 65B | 22.71 | $12.74 | +1.86% |
| CNI | $105.02 | +1.13% | 64.3B | 18.85 | $5.57 | +2.48% |
| TRN | $29.51 | +0.07% | 2.4B | 9.61 | $3.07 | +4.11% |
| GBX | $51.75 | -1.88% | 1.6B | 9.04 | $5.73 | +2.48% |
| FSTR | $27.24 | -1.52% | 283.1M | 40.06 | $0.68 | N/A |
| RAIL | $8.28 | -4.61% | 158.7M | 3.45 | $2.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WAB vs UNP Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while UNP trades at $242.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check UNP's competition here
WAB vs CSX Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while CSX trades at $39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check CSX's competition here
WAB vs CP Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while CP trades at $81.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check CP's competition here
WAB vs NSC Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while NSC trades at $289.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check NSC's competition here
WAB vs CNI Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while CNI trades at $105.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check CNI's competition here
WAB vs TRN Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, TRN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while TRN trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TRN's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to TRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check TRN's competition here
WAB vs GBX Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while GBX trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check GBX's competition here
WAB vs FSTR Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while FSTR trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check FSTR's competition here
WAB vs RAIL Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while RAIL trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAIL's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check RAIL's competition here
WAB vs RVSN Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while RVSN trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check RVSN's competition here
WAB vs KIQ Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check KIQ's competition here
WAB vs RVSNW Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while RVSNW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check RVSNW's competition here
WAB vs KSU Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check KSU's competition here
WAB vs PRL Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, PRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while PRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to PRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check PRL's competition here
WAB vs BNI Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, BNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while BNI trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to BNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check BNI's competition here
WAB vs KSU-P Comparison March 2026
WAB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAB stands at 40.5B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAB is priced at $236.76, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAB currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, WAB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WAB is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WAB.Check KSU-P's competition here