Velo3D, Inc.

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 172.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while ANET trades at $136.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check ANET's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 110.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while STRC trades at $98.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to STRC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check STRC's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while DELL trades at $138.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check DELL's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while STX trades at $155.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check STX's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while SMCI trades at $45.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check SMCI's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while WDC trades at $76.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check WDC's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while HPQ trades at $26.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check HPQ's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while CAJ trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check CAJ's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while NTAP trades at $109.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check NTAP's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while PSTG trades at $57.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 154.29. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check PSTG's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while LOGI trades at $98.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check LOGI's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while IONQ trades at $41.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -19.53. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check IONQ's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while IONQ-WT trades at $29.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check IONQ-WT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check SNDKV's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while QBTS trades at $18.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check QBTS's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while QBTS-WT trades at $14.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check QBTS-WT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while RGTI trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check RGTI's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while RGTIW trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check RGTIW's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while QUBT trades at $15.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -28.39. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check QUBT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while CRCT trades at $5.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check CRCT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check MKFG-WT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 926.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while CRSR trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check CRSR's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 827.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while RCAT trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -16.49. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check RCAT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 790M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while SSYS trades at $9.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check SSYS's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 299.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while NNDM trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check NNDM's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 262.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while DDD trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to DDD's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check DDD's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 221.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while CAN trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check CAN's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while TIO trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check TIO's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while DM trades at $4.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to DM's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check DM's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while MICT trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check MICT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while OSS trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check OSS's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while MKFG trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check MKFG's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while ALOT trades at $11.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check ALOT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while INVE trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check INVE's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while YIBO trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check YIBO's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while UAVS trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check UAVS's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while ZSPC trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check ZSPC's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while QMCO trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check QMCO's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while TACT trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check TACT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while FATH trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check FATH's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while KTCC trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check KTCC's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while EBON trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check EBON's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while SGE trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to SGE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check SGE's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while SCKT trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check SCKT's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while VJET trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check VJET's competition here

VLD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VLD stands at 11M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLD is priced at $1.28, while STRCW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VLD's ROE is -3.12%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD.Check STRCW's competition here