Velo3D, Inc.
Velo3D, Inc. (VLD-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VLD-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: NaN Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLD-WT | $0.03 | +60.34% | 11M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VSMPX | $310.74 | +0.38% | 2.1T | 26.79 | $11.53 | +1.13% |
| VFIAX | $638.79 | +0.43% | 1.5T | 27.60 | $22.99 | +1.12% |
| VIGIX | $239.38 | +0.54% | 351.1B | 35.01 | $6.78 | +0.44% |
| CLBAX | $38.89 | +0.49% | 275.6B | 27.23 | $1.42 | N/A |
| CGFAX | $77.88 | +0.57% | 273.8B | 29.20 | $2.65 | N/A |
| VVIAX | $80.69 | +0.11% | 227.8B | 21.75 | $3.70 | +1.92% |
| FFICX | $63.55 | +0.71% | 178.4B | 27.72 | $2.27 | N/A |
| CICAX | $63.30 | +0.72% | 178.3B | 27.71 | $2.27 | N/A |
| VSMAX | $133.78 | +0.46% | 170.5B | 21.59 | $6.18 | +1.28% |
Stock Comparison
VLD-WT vs VSMPX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VSMPX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VSMPX trades at $310.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSMPX's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VSMPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VSMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VSMPX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VFIAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VFIAX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VFIAX trades at $638.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFIAX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VFIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VFIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VFIAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VIGIX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VIGIX has a market cap of 351.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VIGIX trades at $239.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIGIX's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VIGIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VIGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VIGIX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CLBAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CLBAX has a market cap of 275.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CLBAX trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBAX's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CLBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CLBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CLBAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CGFAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CGFAX has a market cap of 273.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CGFAX trades at $77.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGFAX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CGFAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CGFAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CGFAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VVIAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VVIAX has a market cap of 227.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VVIAX trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVIAX's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VVIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VVIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VVIAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FFICX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FFICX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FFICX trades at $63.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFICX's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FFICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FFICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FFICX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CICAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CICAX has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CICAX trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CICAX's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CICAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VSMAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VSMAX has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VSMAX trades at $133.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSMAX's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VSMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VSMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VSMAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FUNFX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FUNFX has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FUNFX trades at $95.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUNFX's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FUNFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FUNFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FUNFX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VEMRX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VEMRX has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VEMRX trades at $122.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMRX's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VEMRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VEMRX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FIFAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FIFAX has a market cap of 144.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FIFAX trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIFAX's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FIFAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FIFAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FIFAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJEB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJEB has a market cap of 121.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJEB trades at $51.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJEB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJEB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJEB's competition here
VLD-WT vs COWB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, COWB has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while COWB trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to COWB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to COWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check COWB's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJTB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJTB has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJTB trades at $47.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJTB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJTB's competition here
VLD-WT vs BALB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, BALB has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while BALB trades at $47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to BALB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to BALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check BALB's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJGB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJGB has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJGB trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJGB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJGB's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJAB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJAB has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJAB trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJAB's competition here
VLD-WT vs BJJN Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, BJJN has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while BJJN trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to BJJN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to BJJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check BJJN's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJUB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJUB has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJUB trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJUB's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJSB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJSB has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJSB trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJSB's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJPB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJPB has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJPB trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJPB's competition here
VLD-WT vs SGGB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, SGGB has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while SGGB trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to SGGB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to SGGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check SGGB's competition here
VLD-WT vs VEXAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VEXAX has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VEXAX trades at $165.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEXAX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VEXAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VEXAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VEXAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CFAAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CFAAX has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CFAAX trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFAAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CFAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CFAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CFAAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJMB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJMB has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJMB trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJMB's competition here
VLD-WT vs JJCB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JJCB has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JJCB trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JJCB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JJCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JJCB's competition here
VLD-WT vs BJO Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, BJO has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while BJO trades at $41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to BJO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to BJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check BJO's competition here
VLD-WT vs PGMB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, PGMB has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while PGMB trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to PGMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to PGMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check PGMB's competition here
VLD-WT vs FRIAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FRIAX has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FRIAX trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRIAX's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FRIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FRIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FRIAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VWIUX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VWIUX has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VWIUX trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWIUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VWIUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VWIUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VWIUX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VEMPX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VEMPX has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VEMPX trades at $408.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMPX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VEMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VEMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VEMPX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CSPAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CSPAX has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CSPAX trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPAX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CSPAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CSPAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CSPAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CNWAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CNWAX has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CNWAX trades at $100.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNWAX's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CNWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CNWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CNWAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VGSNX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VGSNX has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VGSNX trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSNX's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VGSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VGSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VGSNX's competition here
VLD-WT vs IBIT Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, IBIT has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while IBIT trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to IBIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to IBIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check IBIT's competition here
VLD-WT vs VSIAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VSIAX has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VSIAX trades at $99.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSIAX's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VSIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VSIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VSIAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs HIPO-WT Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
VLD-WT vs ANEFX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, ANEFX has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while ANEFX trades at $75.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANEFX's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to ANEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to ANEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check ANEFX's competition here
VLD-WT vs MFEKX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, MFEKX has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while MFEKX trades at $191.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFEKX's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to MFEKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to MFEKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check MFEKX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFIEX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFIEX has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFIEX trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFIEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFIEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFIEX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFEOX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFEOX has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFEOX trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFEOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFEOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFEOX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFQTX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFQTX has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFQTX trades at $46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFQTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFQTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFQTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFQTX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FOCPX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FOCPX has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FOCPX trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOCPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FOCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FOCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FOCPX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFCEX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFCEX has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFCEX trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFCEX's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFCEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFCEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFCEX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VSGAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VSGAX has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VSGAX trades at $112.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGAX's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VSGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VSGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VSGAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs VMVAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VMVAX has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VMVAX trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMVAX's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VMVAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VMVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VMVAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FGOMX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FGOMX has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FGOMX trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FGOMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FGOMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FGOMX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FFFFX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FFFFX has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FFFFX trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FFFFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FFFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FFFFX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FSNVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FSNVX has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FSNVX trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FSNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FSNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FSNVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs SWTSX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, SWTSX has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while SWTSX trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWTSX's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to SWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to SWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check SWTSX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FSELX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FSELX has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FSELX trades at $49.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSELX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FSELX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FSELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FSELX's competition here
VLD-WT vs PEMGX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, PEMGX has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while PEMGX trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEMGX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to PEMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to PEMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check PEMGX's competition here
VLD-WT vs RFKTX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, RFKTX has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while RFKTX trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFKTX's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to RFKTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to RFKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check RFKTX's competition here
VLD-WT vs TRFHX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, TRFHX has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while TRFHX trades at $28.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRFHX's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to TRFHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to TRFHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check TRFHX's competition here
VLD-WT vs BBGLX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, BBGLX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while BBGLX trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGLX's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to BBGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to BBGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check BBGLX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FKDNX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FKDNX has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FKDNX trades at $176.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FKDNX's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FKDNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FKDNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FKDNX's competition here
VLD-WT vs RITGX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, RITGX has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while RITGX trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITGX's P/E ratio is 49.46. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to RITGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to RITGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check RITGX's competition here
VLD-WT vs BRHYX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, BRHYX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while BRHYX trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRHYX's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to BRHYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to BRHYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check BRHYX's competition here
VLD-WT vs BHYIX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, BHYIX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while BHYIX trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHYIX's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to BHYIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to BHYIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check BHYIX's competition here
VLD-WT vs OWLSX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, OWLSX has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while OWLSX trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OWLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to OWLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to OWLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check OWLSX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FJTKX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FJTKX has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FJTKX trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FJTKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FJTKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FJTKX's competition here
VLD-WT vs JCPUX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JCPUX has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JCPUX trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCPUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JCPUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JCPUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JCPUX's competition here
VLD-WT vs SOJB Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, SOJB has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while SOJB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJB's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to SOJB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to SOJB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check SOJB's competition here
VLD-WT vs SOJA Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, SOJA has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while SOJA trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJA's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to SOJA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to SOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check SOJA's competition here
VLD-WT vs JVMAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, JVMAX has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while JVMAX trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JVMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to JVMAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to JVMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check JVMAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFLVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFLVX has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFLVX trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFLVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFLVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFLVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FZTKX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FZTKX has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FZTKX trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FZTKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FZTKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FZTKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FZTKX's competition here
VLD-WT vs GQGPX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, GQGPX has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while GQGPX trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GQGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to GQGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to GQGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check GQGPX's competition here
VLD-WT vs WCMRX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, WCMRX has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while WCMRX trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to WCMRX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to WCMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check WCMRX's competition here
VLD-WT vs MDDVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, MDDVX has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while MDDVX trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDDVX's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to MDDVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to MDDVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check MDDVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs RFUTX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, RFUTX has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while RFUTX trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFUTX's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to RFUTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to RFUTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check RFUTX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FSPTX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FSPTX has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FSPTX trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSPTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FSPTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FSPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FSPTX's competition here
VLD-WT vs LZOEX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, LZOEX has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while LZOEX trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZOEX's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to LZOEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to LZOEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check LZOEX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFSTX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFSTX has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFSTX trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFSTX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFSVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFSVX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFSVX trades at $58.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFSVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFSVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFSVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs MKLOX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, MKLOX has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while MKLOX trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to MKLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to MKLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check MKLOX's competition here
VLD-WT vs RLEMX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, RLEMX has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while RLEMX trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLEMX's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to RLEMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to RLEMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check RLEMX's competition here
VLD-WT vs ILMNV Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, ILMNV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while ILMNV trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILMNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to ILMNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to ILMNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check ILMNV's competition here
VLD-WT vs VMBSX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, VMBSX has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while VMBSX trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to VMBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to VMBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check VMBSX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DRUA Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DRUA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DRUA trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRUA's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DRUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DRUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DRUA's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFISX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFISX has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFISX trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFISX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFISX's competition here
VLD-WT vs TWCGX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, TWCGX has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while TWCGX trades at $54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWCGX's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to TWCGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to TWCGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check TWCGX's competition here
VLD-WT vs CBTAX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, CBTAX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while CBTAX trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to CBTAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to CBTAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check CBTAX's competition here
VLD-WT vs TEPLX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, TEPLX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while TEPLX trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEPLX's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to TEPLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to TEPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check TEPLX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFFVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFFVX has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFFVX trades at $41.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFFVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFFVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFFVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFFVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DISVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DISVX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DISVX trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DISVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DISVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DISVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FIQZX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FIQZX has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FIQZX trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIQZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FIQZX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FIQZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FIQZX's competition here
VLD-WT vs OTCIX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, OTCIX has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while OTCIX trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTCIX's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to OTCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to OTCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check OTCIX's competition here
VLD-WT vs HIMFX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, HIMFX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while HIMFX trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to HIMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to HIMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check HIMFX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFUSX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFUSX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFUSX trades at $45.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFUSX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFUSX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFEVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFEVX has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFEVX trades at $41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFEVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFEVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFEVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFIVX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFIVX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFIVX trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFIVX's competition here
VLD-WT vs DFAPX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, DFAPX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while DFAPX trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to DFAPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to DFAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check DFAPX's competition here
VLD-WT vs FIGRX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, FIGRX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while FIGRX trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to FIGRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to FIGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check FIGRX's competition here
VLD-WT vs MRSKX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, MRSKX has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while MRSKX trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRSKX's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to MRSKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to MRSKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check MRSKX's competition here
VLD-WT vs GQLIX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, GQLIX has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while GQLIX trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GQLIX's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to GQLIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to GQLIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check GQLIX's competition here
VLD-WT vs LIJIX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, LIJIX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while LIJIX trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIJIX's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to LIJIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to LIJIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check LIJIX's competition here
VLD-WT vs HBLFX Comparison February 2026
VLD-WT plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLD-WT stands at 11M. In comparison, HBLFX has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLD-WT is priced at $0.03, while HBLFX trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLD-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBLFX's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, VLD-WT's ROE is -1.58%, compared to HBLFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLD-WT is more volatile compared to HBLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLD-WT.Check HBLFX's competition here