Vivid Mercantile Ltd.

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SUNDARMHLD.NS has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SUNDARMHLD.NS trades at ₹684.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SUNDARMHLD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SUNDARMHLD.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, BLS.BO has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while BLS.BO trades at ₹296.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas BLS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLS.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to BLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check BLS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, BLS.NS has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while BLS.NS trades at ₹296.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas BLS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLS.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to BLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check BLS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, CMSINFO.BO has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while CMSINFO.BO trades at ₹318.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas CMSINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSINFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to CMSINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check CMSINFO.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, CMSINFO.NS has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while CMSINFO.NS trades at ₹318.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas CMSINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSINFO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to CMSINFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check CMSINFO.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PDSL.BO has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PDSL.BO trades at ₹301.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PDSL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PDSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to PDSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PDSL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PDSL.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PDSL.NS trades at ₹301.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PDSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to PDSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PDSL.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SEIL.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SEIL.BO trades at ₹178.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 636.79. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to SEIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SEIL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, JAYKAY.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while JAYKAY.BO trades at ₹164.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas JAYKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 71.72. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAYKAY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to JAYKAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check JAYKAY.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, HGS.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while HGS.BO trades at ₹426.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas HGS.BO's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to HGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check HGS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, HGS.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while HGS.NS trades at ₹426.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas HGS.NS's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to HGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check HGS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ALLSEC.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ALLSEC.NS trades at ₹1,084.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ALLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ALLSEC.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ALLSEC.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ALLSEC.BO trades at ₹1,080.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ALLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ALLSEC.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, BLIL.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while BLIL.BO trades at ₹73.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas BLIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to BLIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check BLIL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, BLSE.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while BLSE.NS trades at ₹175.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas BLSE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLSE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to BLSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check BLSE.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ONEPOINT.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ONEPOINT.NS trades at ₹56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ONEPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONEPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to ONEPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ONEPOINT.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ALLDIGI.BO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ALLDIGI.BO trades at ₹854.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ALLDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALLDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to ALLDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ALLDIGI.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ALLDIGI.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ALLDIGI.NS trades at ₹854.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ALLDIGI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALLDIGI.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to ALLDIGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ALLDIGI.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ONEGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ONEGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹645.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ONEGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ONEGLOBAL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, UDS.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while UDS.NS trades at ₹161.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas UDS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UDS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to UDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check UDS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, UDS.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while UDS.BO trades at ₹161.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas UDS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UDS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to UDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check UDS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, BLUSPRING.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while BLUSPRING.NS trades at ₹67.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas BLUSPRING.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLUSPRING.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to BLUSPRING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check BLUSPRING.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ASTAR.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ASTAR.BO trades at ₹620.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to ASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ASTAR.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, KAPSTON.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while KAPSTON.NS trades at ₹308.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas KAPSTON.NS's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAPSTON.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to KAPSTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check KAPSTON.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, GKWLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while GKWLIMITED.NS trades at ₹1,559.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas GKWLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 130.07. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GKWLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to GKWLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check GKWLIMITED.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, EXHICON.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while EXHICON.BO trades at ₹540.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas EXHICON.BO's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXHICON.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to EXHICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check EXHICON.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, MADHUVEER.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while MADHUVEER.BO trades at ₹215.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas MADHUVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 145.34. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MADHUVEER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to MADHUVEER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check MADHUVEER.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, REPRO.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while REPRO.BO trades at ₹359.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas REPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REPRO.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to REPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check REPRO.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, REPRO.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while REPRO.NS trades at ₹357.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas REPRO.NS's P/E ratio is -24.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REPRO.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to REPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check REPRO.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, VINSYS.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while VINSYS.NS trades at ₹319.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas VINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VINSYS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to VINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check VINSYS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RADIANTCMS.BO trades at ₹41.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RADIANTCMS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RADIANTCMS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RADIANTCMS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RADIANTCMS.NS trades at ₹41.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RADIANTCMS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RADIANTCMS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RADIANTCMS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, CGRAPHICS.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while CGRAPHICS.NS trades at ₹173.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas CGRAPHICS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGRAPHICS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to CGRAPHICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check CGRAPHICS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ALPHALOGIC.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ALPHALOGIC.BO trades at ₹63.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ALPHALOGIC.BO's P/E ratio is 69.79. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ALPHALOGIC.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, LIKHAMI.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while LIKHAMI.BO trades at ₹352.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas LIKHAMI.BO's P/E ratio is 1530.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LIKHAMI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to LIKHAMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check LIKHAMI.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, MAJESAUT.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while MAJESAUT.BO trades at ₹318.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas MAJESAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAJESAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to MAJESAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check MAJESAUT.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, DJML.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while DJML.NS trades at ₹92.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas DJML.NS's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DJML.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to DJML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check DJML.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, DJML.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while DJML.BO trades at ₹92.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas DJML.BO's P/E ratio is 38.20. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DJML.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to DJML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check DJML.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, EFACTOR.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while EFACTOR.NS trades at ₹229.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas EFACTOR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EFACTOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to EFACTOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check EFACTOR.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ARIHANTACA.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ARIHANTACA.NS trades at ₹478.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ARIHANTACA.NS's P/E ratio is 48.62. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARIHANTACA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ARIHANTACA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ARIHANTACA.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, 531216.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while 531216.BO trades at ₹12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas 531216.BO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 531216.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to 531216.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check 531216.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, DYNAMIC.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while DYNAMIC.NS trades at ₹119.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas DYNAMIC.NS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DYNAMIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to DYNAMIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check DYNAMIC.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, DUGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while DUGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas DUGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 64.91. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUGLOBAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to DUGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check DUGLOBAL.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, INFOLLION.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while INFOLLION.NS trades at ₹253.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas INFOLLION.NS's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INFOLLION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to INFOLLION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check INFOLLION.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, COMFINTE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while COMFINTE.BO trades at ₹7.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas COMFINTE.BO's P/E ratio is -66.18. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COMFINTE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to COMFINTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check COMFINTE.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RUCHINFRA.NS trades at ₹6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RUCHINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUCHINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RUCHINFRA.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RUCHINFRA.BO trades at ₹6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RUCHINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUCHINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RUCHINFRA.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, KANDARP.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while KANDARP.NS trades at ₹141.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas KANDARP.NS's P/E ratio is 79.27. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KANDARP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to KANDARP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check KANDARP.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, KHFM.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while KHFM.NS trades at ₹52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas KHFM.NS's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHFM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to KHFM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check KHFM.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ISTRNETWK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ISTRNETWK.BO trades at ₹51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ISTRNETWK.BO's P/E ratio is 83.61. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISTRNETWK.BO's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ISTRNETWK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ISTRNETWK.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, HARIGOV.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while HARIGOV.BO trades at ₹208.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas HARIGOV.BO's P/E ratio is -1734.58. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HARIGOV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to HARIGOV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check HARIGOV.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, TECHKGREEN.BO has a market cap of 946.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while TECHKGREEN.BO trades at ₹128.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas TECHKGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TECHKGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to TECHKGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check TECHKGREEN.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SUPRAPFSL.BO has a market cap of 822.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SUPRAPFSL.BO trades at ₹24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SUPRAPFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SUPRAPFSL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RIDDHICORP.BO has a market cap of 735.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RIDDHICORP.BO trades at ₹61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RIDDHICORP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RIDDHICORP.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to RIDDHICORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RIDDHICORP.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, TRESCON.BO has a market cap of 723.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while TRESCON.BO trades at ₹9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas TRESCON.BO's P/E ratio is 58.71. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRESCON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to TRESCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check TRESCON.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, CHOKSILA.BO has a market cap of 717.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while CHOKSILA.BO trades at ₹103.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas CHOKSILA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHOKSILA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to CHOKSILA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check CHOKSILA.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SERVICE.NS has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SERVICE.NS trades at ₹57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SERVICE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SERVICE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to SERVICE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SERVICE.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, BLUEPEBBLE.NS has a market cap of 563M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while BLUEPEBBLE.NS trades at ₹138.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas BLUEPEBBLE.NS's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLUEPEBBLE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to BLUEPEBBLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check BLUEPEBBLE.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SHARIKA.BO has a market cap of 562.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SHARIKA.BO trades at ₹13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SHARIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHARIKA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to SHARIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SHARIKA.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ACCELERATE.BO has a market cap of 542.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ACCELERATE.BO trades at ₹157.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ACCELERATE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACCELERATE.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ACCELERATE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ACCELERATE.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, HILIKS.BO has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while HILIKS.BO trades at ₹48.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas HILIKS.BO's P/E ratio is 322.53. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HILIKS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to HILIKS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check HILIKS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RITHWIKFMS.BO has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RITHWIKFMS.BO trades at ₹155.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RITHWIKFMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RITHWIKFMS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, VERTEXPLUS.NS has a market cap of 469.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while VERTEXPLUS.NS trades at ₹85.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas VERTEXPLUS.NS's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VERTEXPLUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to VERTEXPLUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check VERTEXPLUS.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, VKAL.BO has a market cap of 433.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while VKAL.BO trades at ₹1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas VKAL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VKAL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to VKAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check VKAL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, FUTSOL.BO has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while FUTSOL.BO trades at ₹39.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas FUTSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 86.98. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUTSOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to FUTSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check FUTSOL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, HRHNEXT.NS has a market cap of 407.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while HRHNEXT.NS trades at ₹30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas HRHNEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRHNEXT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to HRHNEXT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check HRHNEXT.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SUGALDAM.BO has a market cap of 395.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SUGALDAM.BO trades at ₹63.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SUGALDAM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUGALDAM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to SUGALDAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SUGALDAM.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, JTAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while JTAPARIA.BO trades at ₹23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas JTAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JTAPARIA.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to JTAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check JTAPARIA.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PROMAX.BO has a market cap of 355.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PROMAX.BO trades at ₹14.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PROMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PROMAX.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to PROMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PROMAX.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, WALCHPF.BO has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while WALCHPF.BO trades at ₹110.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas WALCHPF.BO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WALCHPF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to WALCHPF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check WALCHPF.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PRISMX.BO has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PRISMX.BO trades at ₹0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PRISMX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRISMX.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to PRISMX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PRISMX.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, MADHUSE.BO has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while MADHUSE.BO trades at ₹19.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas MADHUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MADHUSE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to MADHUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check MADHUSE.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, KACL.BO has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while KACL.BO trades at ₹5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas KACL.BO's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KACL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to KACL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check KACL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, LIBORDFIN.BO has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while LIBORDFIN.BO trades at ₹17.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas LIBORDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LIBORDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to LIBORDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check LIBORDFIN.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, MPILCORPL.BO has a market cap of 261.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while MPILCORPL.BO trades at ₹458.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas MPILCORPL.BO's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPILCORPL.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to MPILCORPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check MPILCORPL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PREMCAP.BO has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PREMCAP.BO trades at ₹7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PREMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -352.00. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PREMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to PREMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PREMCAP.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, DECOMIC.BO has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while DECOMIC.BO trades at ₹61.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas DECOMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DECOMIC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to DECOMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check DECOMIC.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, KAARYAFSL.BO has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while KAARYAFSL.BO trades at ₹26.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas KAARYAFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAARYAFSL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to KAARYAFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check KAARYAFSL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, INLANPR.BO has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while INLANPR.BO trades at ₹51.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas INLANPR.BO's P/E ratio is -69.59. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INLANPR.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to INLANPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check INLANPR.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SMARTFIN.BO has a market cap of 246.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SMARTFIN.BO trades at ₹8.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SMARTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMARTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to SMARTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SMARTFIN.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ESHAMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ESHAMEDIA.BO trades at ₹31.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ESHAMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -13.84. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ESHAMEDIA.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, UNICK.BO has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while UNICK.BO trades at ₹39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas UNICK.BO's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNICK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to UNICK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check UNICK.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SVS.BO has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SVS.BO trades at ₹9.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SVS.BO's P/E ratio is 199.80. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to SVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SVS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PADAMCO.BO has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PADAMCO.BO trades at ₹1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PADAMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PADAMCO.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to PADAMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PADAMCO.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, MNPLFIN.BO has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while MNPLFIN.BO trades at ₹22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas MNPLFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 90.40. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNPLFIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to MNPLFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check MNPLFIN.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SBECSYS.BO has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SBECSYS.BO trades at ₹18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SBECSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBECSYS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to SBECSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SBECSYS.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PROCLB.BO has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PROCLB.BO trades at ₹33.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PROCLB.BO's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PROCLB.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to PROCLB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PROCLB.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ICSL.BO has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ICSL.BO trades at ₹4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ICSL.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICSL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ICSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ICSL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SUJALA.BO has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SUJALA.BO trades at ₹26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SUJALA.BO's P/E ratio is 81.50. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUJALA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to SUJALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SUJALA.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, RAJSPTR.BO has a market cap of 149.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while RAJSPTR.BO trades at ₹9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas RAJSPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RAJSPTR.BO's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to RAJSPTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check RAJSPTR.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, INNOKAIZ.BO has a market cap of 143.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while INNOKAIZ.BO trades at ₹14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas INNOKAIZ.BO's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INNOKAIZ.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to INNOKAIZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check INNOKAIZ.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, GLCL.BO has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while GLCL.BO trades at ₹22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas GLCL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to GLCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check GLCL.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, KIRANPR.BO has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while KIRANPR.BO trades at ₹26.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas KIRANPR.BO's P/E ratio is 145.83. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRANPR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to KIRANPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check KIRANPR.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, AMALGAM.BO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while AMALGAM.BO trades at ₹47.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas AMALGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -36.86. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMALGAM.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to AMALGAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check AMALGAM.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, SHANGAR.BO has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while SHANGAR.BO trades at ₹0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas SHANGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHANGAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to SHANGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check SHANGAR.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, ASIAN.BO has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while ASIAN.BO trades at ₹36.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas ASIAN.BO's P/E ratio is 164.00. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASIAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to ASIAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check ASIAN.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, VISVEN.BO has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while VISVEN.BO trades at ₹40.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas VISVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VISVEN.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is less volatile compared to VISVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check VISVEN.BO's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, WINNY.NS has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while WINNY.NS trades at ₹47.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas WINNY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WINNY.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to WINNY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check WINNY.NS's competition here

VIVIDM.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIVIDM.BO stands at 705.8M. In comparison, PLADAINFO.NS has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIVIDM.BO is priced at ₹7.04, while PLADAINFO.NS trades at ₹11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIVIDM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.11, whereas PLADAINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, VIVIDM.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLADAINFO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIVIDM.BO is more volatile compared to PLADAINFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIVIDM.BO.Check PLADAINFO.NS's competition here