Service Care Ltd.
Service Care Ltd. (SERVICE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SERVICE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE.NS | ₹51.85 | +8.25% | 577.8M | 30.83 | ₹1.63 | N/A |
| SUNDARMHLD.NS | ₹684.25 | +0.00% | 152B | 33.12 | ₹20.66 | +1.21% |
| BLS.BO | ₹264.70 | -1.65% | 109.3B | 18.18 | ₹14.60 | +1.13% |
| BLS.NS | ₹264.85 | -1.56% | 109.2B | 15.94 | ₹16.65 | +1.13% |
| CMSINFO.BO | ₹309.75 | -0.23% | 50.8B | 16.88 | ₹18.27 | +3.15% |
| CMSINFO.NS | ₹309.40 | -0.37% | 50.7B | 16.87 | ₹18.26 | +3.15% |
| PDSL.NS | ₹299.45 | -0.02% | 42.5B | 38.27 | ₹7.87 | +1.11% |
| PDSL.BO | ₹299.35 | +0.00% | 42.4B | 38.23 | ₹7.86 | +1.11% |
| SEIL.BO | ₹192.40 | -2.04% | 31.3B | 693.39 | ₹0.28 | N/A |
| JAYKAY.BO | ₹213.70 | +8.18% | 26.2B | 87.75 | ₹2.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SERVICE.NS vs SUNDARMHLD.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SUNDARMHLD.NS has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SUNDARMHLD.NS trades at ₹684.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SUNDARMHLD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SUNDARMHLD.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs BLS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, BLS.BO has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while BLS.BO trades at ₹264.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLS.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to BLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check BLS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs BLS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, BLS.NS has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while BLS.NS trades at ₹264.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLS.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to BLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check BLS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs CMSINFO.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, CMSINFO.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while CMSINFO.BO trades at ₹309.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CMSINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMSINFO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to CMSINFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check CMSINFO.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs CMSINFO.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, CMSINFO.NS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while CMSINFO.NS trades at ₹309.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CMSINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMSINFO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to CMSINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check CMSINFO.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PDSL.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PDSL.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PDSL.NS trades at ₹299.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PDSL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to PDSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check PDSL.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PDSL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PDSL.BO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PDSL.BO trades at ₹299.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PDSL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PDSL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to PDSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check PDSL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SEIL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SEIL.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SEIL.BO trades at ₹192.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 693.39. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SEIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SEIL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs JAYKAY.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, JAYKAY.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while JAYKAY.BO trades at ₹213.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas JAYKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 87.75. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JAYKAY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to JAYKAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check JAYKAY.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs BLSE.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, BLSE.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while BLSE.NS trades at ₹220.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLSE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLSE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to BLSE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check BLSE.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs HGS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, HGS.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while HGS.BO trades at ₹413.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HGS.BO's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HGS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to HGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check HGS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs HGS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, HGS.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while HGS.NS trades at ₹414.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HGS.NS's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HGS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to HGS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check HGS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ALLSEC.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ALLSEC.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ALLSEC.NS trades at ₹1,084.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ALLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ALLSEC.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ONEPOINT.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ONEPOINT.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ONEPOINT.NS trades at ₹64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ONEPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ONEPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ONEPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ONEPOINT.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ALLSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ALLSEC.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ALLSEC.BO trades at ₹1,080.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ALLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ALLSEC.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs BLIL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, BLIL.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while BLIL.BO trades at ₹72.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLIL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to BLIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check BLIL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ALLDIGI.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ALLDIGI.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ALLDIGI.BO trades at ₹830.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ALLDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ALLDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ALLDIGI.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ALLDIGI.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ALLDIGI.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ALLDIGI.NS trades at ₹830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ALLDIGI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLDIGI.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ALLDIGI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ALLDIGI.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs UDS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, UDS.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while UDS.BO trades at ₹177.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas UDS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UDS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to UDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check UDS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs UDS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, UDS.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while UDS.NS trades at ₹178.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas UDS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UDS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to UDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check UDS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs KAPSTON.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, KAPSTON.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while KAPSTON.NS trades at ₹346.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KAPSTON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAPSTON.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to KAPSTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check KAPSTON.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ASTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ASTAR.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ASTAR.BO trades at ₹656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ASTAR.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs GKWLIMITED.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, GKWLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while GKWLIMITED.NS trades at ₹1,696.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GKWLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 145.03. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GKWLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to GKWLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check GKWLIMITED.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs BLUSPRING.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, BLUSPRING.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while BLUSPRING.NS trades at ₹68.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLUSPRING.NS's P/E ratio is -66.14. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUSPRING.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to BLUSPRING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check BLUSPRING.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ONEGLOBAL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ONEGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ONEGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹424.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ONEGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ONEGLOBAL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs EXHICON.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, EXHICON.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while EXHICON.BO trades at ₹459.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EXHICON.BO's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXHICON.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to EXHICON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check EXHICON.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs MADHUVEER.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, MADHUVEER.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while MADHUVEER.BO trades at ₹226.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MADHUVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 156.06. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MADHUVEER.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to MADHUVEER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check MADHUVEER.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs REPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, REPRO.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while REPRO.NS trades at ₹380.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas REPRO.NS's P/E ratio is -25.89. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to REPRO.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to REPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check REPRO.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs REPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, REPRO.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while REPRO.BO trades at ₹380.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas REPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -26.38. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to REPRO.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to REPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check REPRO.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs VINSYS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, VINSYS.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while VINSYS.NS trades at ₹378.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VINSYS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to VINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check VINSYS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RADIANTCMS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RADIANTCMS.NS trades at ₹41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RADIANTCMS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RADIANTCMS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check RADIANTCMS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RADIANTCMS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RADIANTCMS.BO trades at ₹42.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RADIANTCMS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RADIANTCMS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check RADIANTCMS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs DJML.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, DJML.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while DJML.NS trades at ₹106.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DJML.NS's P/E ratio is 42.68. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DJML.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to DJML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check DJML.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs DJML.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, DJML.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while DJML.BO trades at ₹106.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DJML.BO's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DJML.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to DJML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check DJML.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs MAJESAUT.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, MAJESAUT.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while MAJESAUT.BO trades at ₹335.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MAJESAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MAJESAUT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to MAJESAUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check MAJESAUT.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs CGRAPHICS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, CGRAPHICS.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while CGRAPHICS.NS trades at ₹148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CGRAPHICS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGRAPHICS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to CGRAPHICS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check CGRAPHICS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs LIKHAMI.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, LIKHAMI.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while LIKHAMI.BO trades at ₹342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas LIKHAMI.BO's P/E ratio is 1628.57. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LIKHAMI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and LIKHAMI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIKHAMI.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ALPHALOGIC.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ALPHALOGIC.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ALPHALOGIC.BO trades at ₹53.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ALPHALOGIC.BO's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ALPHALOGIC.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs 531216.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, 531216.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while 531216.BO trades at ₹12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas 531216.BO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to 531216.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and 531216.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 531216.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ARIHANTACA.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ARIHANTACA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ARIHANTACA.NS trades at ₹450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ARIHANTACA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.69. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARIHANTACA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and ARIHANTACA.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARIHANTACA.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs DYNAMIC.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, DYNAMIC.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while DYNAMIC.NS trades at ₹119.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DYNAMIC.NS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DYNAMIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check DYNAMIC.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs EFACTOR.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, EFACTOR.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while EFACTOR.NS trades at ₹180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EFACTOR.NS's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EFACTOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to EFACTOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check EFACTOR.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs DUGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, DUGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while DUGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DUGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 63.07. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DUGLOBAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to DUGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check DUGLOBAL.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs COMFINTE.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, COMFINTE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while COMFINTE.BO trades at ₹6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas COMFINTE.BO's P/E ratio is -55.64. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COMFINTE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to COMFINTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check COMFINTE.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs INFOLLION.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, INFOLLION.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while INFOLLION.NS trades at ₹194.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas INFOLLION.NS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INFOLLION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to INFOLLION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check INFOLLION.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RUCHINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RUCHINFRA.NS trades at ₹6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RUCHINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RUCHINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check RUCHINFRA.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RUCHINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RUCHINFRA.BO trades at ₹6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RUCHINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RUCHINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check RUCHINFRA.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs KANDARP.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, KANDARP.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while KANDARP.NS trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KANDARP.NS's P/E ratio is 88.20. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KANDARP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to KANDARP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check KANDARP.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs KHFM.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, KHFM.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while KHFM.NS trades at ₹60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KHFM.NS's P/E ratio is 41.26. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KHFM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to KHFM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check KHFM.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ISTRNETWK.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ISTRNETWK.BO has a market cap of 980.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ISTRNETWK.BO trades at ₹45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ISTRNETWK.BO's P/E ratio is 73.87. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ISTRNETWK.BO's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ISTRNETWK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ISTRNETWK.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SUPRAPFSL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SUPRAPFSL.BO has a market cap of 960.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SUPRAPFSL.BO trades at ₹30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SUPRAPFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SUPRAPFSL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs CHOKSILA.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, CHOKSILA.BO has a market cap of 940.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while CHOKSILA.BO trades at ₹132.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CHOKSILA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.39. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHOKSILA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to CHOKSILA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check CHOKSILA.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs TECHKGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, TECHKGREEN.BO has a market cap of 849M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while TECHKGREEN.BO trades at ₹138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TECHKGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TECHKGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to TECHKGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check TECHKGREEN.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs HARIGOV.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, HARIGOV.BO has a market cap of 759.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while HARIGOV.BO trades at ₹151.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HARIGOV.BO's P/E ratio is -1168.46. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HARIGOV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and HARIGOV.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HARIGOV.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RIDDHICORP.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RIDDHICORP.BO has a market cap of 744.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RIDDHICORP.BO trades at ₹63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RIDDHICORP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RIDDHICORP.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to RIDDHICORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check RIDDHICORP.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs VIVIDM.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, VIVIDM.BO has a market cap of 682.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while VIVIDM.BO trades at ₹7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VIVIDM.BO's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVIDM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to VIVIDM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check VIVIDM.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs TRESCON.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, TRESCON.BO has a market cap of 657.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while TRESCON.BO trades at ₹9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TRESCON.BO's P/E ratio is 52.71. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRESCON.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to TRESCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check TRESCON.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs HILIKS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, HILIKS.BO has a market cap of 612.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while HILIKS.BO trades at ₹58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HILIKS.BO's P/E ratio is 380.00. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HILIKS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to HILIKS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check HILIKS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SHARIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SHARIKA.BO has a market cap of 524.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SHARIKA.BO trades at ₹12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SHARIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -48.44. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHARIKA.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SHARIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SHARIKA.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ACCELERATE.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ACCELERATE.BO has a market cap of 481.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ACCELERATE.BO trades at ₹140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ACCELERATE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACCELERATE.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and ACCELERATE.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACCELERATE.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RITHWIKFMS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RITHWIKFMS.BO has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RITHWIKFMS.BO trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RITHWIKFMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and RITHWIKFMS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RITHWIKFMS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs FUTSOL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, FUTSOL.BO has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while FUTSOL.BO trades at ₹43.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FUTSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.73. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUTSOL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to FUTSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check FUTSOL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SUGALDAM.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SUGALDAM.BO has a market cap of 430M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SUGALDAM.BO trades at ₹68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SUGALDAM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUGALDAM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SUGALDAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SUGALDAM.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs BLUEPEBBLE.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, BLUEPEBBLE.NS has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while BLUEPEBBLE.NS trades at ₹95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLUEPEBBLE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUEPEBBLE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to BLUEPEBBLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check BLUEPEBBLE.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs VERTEXPLUS.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, VERTEXPLUS.NS has a market cap of 400.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while VERTEXPLUS.NS trades at ₹73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VERTEXPLUS.NS's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VERTEXPLUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to VERTEXPLUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check VERTEXPLUS.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs WALCHPF.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, WALCHPF.BO has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while WALCHPF.BO trades at ₹138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WALCHPF.BO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WALCHPF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to WALCHPF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check WALCHPF.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PROMAX.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PROMAX.BO has a market cap of 385M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PROMAX.BO trades at ₹15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PROMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PROMAX.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and PROMAX.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PROMAX.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs VKAL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, VKAL.BO has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while VKAL.BO trades at ₹1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VKAL.BO's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VKAL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to VKAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check VKAL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs JTAPARIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, JTAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while JTAPARIA.BO trades at ₹23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas JTAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JTAPARIA.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to JTAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check JTAPARIA.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs HRHNEXT.NS Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, HRHNEXT.NS has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while HRHNEXT.NS trades at ₹27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HRHNEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HRHNEXT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to HRHNEXT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check HRHNEXT.NS's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs KACL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, KACL.BO has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while KACL.BO trades at ₹6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KACL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KACL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to KACL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check KACL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs MPILCORPL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, MPILCORPL.BO has a market cap of 312.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while MPILCORPL.BO trades at ₹519.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MPILCORPL.BO's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MPILCORPL.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to MPILCORPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check MPILCORPL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PRISMX.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PRISMX.BO has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PRISMX.BO trades at ₹0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PRISMX.BO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRISMX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to PRISMX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check PRISMX.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs MADHUSE.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, MADHUSE.BO has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while MADHUSE.BO trades at ₹18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MADHUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MADHUSE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to MADHUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check MADHUSE.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs LIBORDFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, LIBORDFIN.BO has a market cap of 273.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while LIBORDFIN.BO trades at ₹17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas LIBORDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 52.73. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LIBORDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to LIBORDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check LIBORDFIN.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs KAARYAFSL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, KAARYAFSL.BO has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while KAARYAFSL.BO trades at ₹26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KAARYAFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAARYAFSL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and KAARYAFSL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAARYAFSL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs UNICK.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, UNICK.BO has a market cap of 257.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while UNICK.BO trades at ₹48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas UNICK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNICK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to UNICK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check UNICK.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs DECOMIC.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, DECOMIC.BO has a market cap of 255.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while DECOMIC.BO trades at ₹62.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DECOMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DECOMIC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to DECOMIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check DECOMIC.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SMARTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SMARTFIN.BO has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SMARTFIN.BO trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SMARTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMARTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SMARTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SMARTFIN.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs INLANPR.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, INLANPR.BO has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while INLANPR.BO trades at ₹47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas INLANPR.BO's P/E ratio is -64.12. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INLANPR.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to INLANPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check INLANPR.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ESHAMEDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ESHAMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 222.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ESHAMEDIA.BO trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ESHAMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and ESHAMEDIA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESHAMEDIA.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs AMALGAM.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, AMALGAM.BO has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while AMALGAM.BO trades at ₹74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AMALGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMALGAM.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to AMALGAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check AMALGAM.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs MNPLFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, MNPLFIN.BO has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while MNPLFIN.BO trades at ₹23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MNPLFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 92.40. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MNPLFIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and MNPLFIN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNPLFIN.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs INNOKAIZ.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, INNOKAIZ.BO has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while INNOKAIZ.BO trades at ₹17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas INNOKAIZ.BO's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INNOKAIZ.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to INNOKAIZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check INNOKAIZ.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ICSL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ICSL.BO has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ICSL.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ICSL.BO's P/E ratio is 245.00. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ICSL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ICSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ICSL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PREMCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PREMCAP.BO has a market cap of 173.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PREMCAP.BO trades at ₹4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PREMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -234.50. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PREMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to PREMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check PREMCAP.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SBECSYS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SBECSYS.BO has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SBECSYS.BO trades at ₹17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SBECSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBECSYS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SBECSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SBECSYS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SVS.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SVS.BO has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SVS.BO trades at ₹8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SVS.BO's P/E ratio is 160.20. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SVS.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PROCLB.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PROCLB.BO has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PROCLB.BO trades at ₹32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PROCLB.BO's P/E ratio is -30.95. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PROCLB.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to PROCLB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check PROCLB.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs KIRANPR.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, KIRANPR.BO has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while KIRANPR.BO trades at ₹28.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KIRANPR.BO's P/E ratio is 159.17. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRANPR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and KIRANPR.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIRANPR.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs GLCL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, GLCL.BO has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while GLCL.BO trades at ₹22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GLCL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to GLCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check GLCL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs HBEL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, HBEL.BO has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while HBEL.BO trades at ₹23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HBEL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HBEL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to HBEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check HBEL.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs PADAMCO.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, PADAMCO.BO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while PADAMCO.BO trades at ₹0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PADAMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PADAMCO.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to PADAMCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check PADAMCO.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs ASIAN.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, ASIAN.BO has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while ASIAN.BO trades at ₹34.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ASIAN.BO's P/E ratio is 182.40. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASIAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to ASIAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check ASIAN.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs RAJSPTR.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, RAJSPTR.BO has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while RAJSPTR.BO trades at ₹7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RAJSPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAJSPTR.BO's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and RAJSPTR.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAJSPTR.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs VISVEN.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, VISVEN.BO has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while VISVEN.BO trades at ₹38.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VISVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VISVEN.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to VISVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check VISVEN.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SUJALA.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SUJALA.BO has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SUJALA.BO trades at ₹18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SUJALA.BO's P/E ratio is 62.06. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUJALA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SUJALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SUJALA.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs SHANGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, SHANGAR.BO has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while SHANGAR.BO trades at ₹0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SHANGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHANGAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS is less volatile compared to SHANGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SERVICE.NS.Check SHANGAR.BO's competition here
SERVICE.NS vs GGPL.BO Comparison May 2026
SERVICE.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SERVICE.NS stands at 577.8M. In comparison, GGPL.BO has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SERVICE.NS is priced at ₹51.85, while GGPL.BO trades at ₹1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SERVICE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GGPL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, SERVICE.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GGPL.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SERVICE.NS and GGPL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGPL.BO's competition here