Comfort Intech Limited
Comfort Intech Limited (531216.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (531216.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 531216.BO | ₹12.36 | +1.73% | 2.8B | 17.17 | ₹0.72 | +0.93% |
| SUNDARMHLD.NS | ₹684.25 | +0.00% | 152B | 33.12 | ₹20.66 | +1.21% |
| BLS.NS | ₹276.76 | -5.23% | 116.6B | 18.12 | ₹15.63 | +1.06% |
| BLS.BO | ₹283.15 | -2.98% | 116.6B | 19.39 | ₹14.60 | +1.06% |
| CMSINFO.BO | ₹312.90 | -1.57% | 51.5B | 16.18 | ₹19.34 | +3.10% |
| CMSINFO.NS | ₹311.10 | -2.11% | 51.5B | 16.15 | ₹19.36 | +3.10% |
| PDSL.BO | ₹285.60 | -1.14% | 40.3B | 37.58 | ₹7.60 | +1.17% |
| PDSL.NS | ₹283.45 | -2.06% | 40.3B | 37.51 | ₹7.61 | +1.17% |
| SEIL.BO | ₹180.10 | -1.67% | 29.4B | 677.22 | ₹0.27 | N/A |
| JAYKAY.BO | ₹162.00 | -1.37% | 21.2B | 71.20 | ₹2.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
531216.BO vs SUNDARMHLD.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUNDARMHLD.NS has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SUNDARMHLD.NS trades at ₹684.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SUNDARMHLD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SUNDARMHLD.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs BLS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLS.NS has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while BLS.NS trades at ₹276.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BLS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLS.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to BLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check BLS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs BLS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLS.BO has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while BLS.BO trades at ₹283.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BLS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLS.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to BLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check BLS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs CMSINFO.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CMSINFO.BO has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while CMSINFO.BO trades at ₹312.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CMSINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMSINFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and CMSINFO.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMSINFO.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs CMSINFO.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CMSINFO.NS has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while CMSINFO.NS trades at ₹311.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CMSINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMSINFO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to CMSINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check CMSINFO.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs PDSL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PDSL.BO has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PDSL.BO trades at ₹285.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PDSL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PDSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to PDSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check PDSL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs PDSL.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PDSL.NS has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PDSL.NS trades at ₹283.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PDSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to PDSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check PDSL.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs SEIL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEIL.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SEIL.BO trades at ₹180.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 677.22. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SEIL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs JAYKAY.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JAYKAY.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while JAYKAY.BO trades at ₹162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas JAYKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 71.20. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JAYKAY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and JAYKAY.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAYKAY.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs HGS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HGS.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while HGS.NS trades at ₹412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HGS.NS's P/E ratio is -18.56. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HGS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to HGS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check HGS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs HGS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HGS.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while HGS.BO trades at ₹413.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HGS.BO's P/E ratio is -18.53. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HGS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to HGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check HGS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs ALLSEC.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLSEC.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ALLSEC.NS trades at ₹1,084.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ALLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ALLSEC.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ALLSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLSEC.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ALLSEC.BO trades at ₹1,080.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ALLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ALLSEC.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs BLIL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLIL.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while BLIL.BO trades at ₹73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BLIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to BLIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check BLIL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs BLSE.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLSE.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while BLSE.NS trades at ₹178.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BLSE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLSE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to BLSE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check BLSE.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ONEPOINT.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ONEPOINT.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ONEPOINT.NS trades at ₹54.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ONEPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONEPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ONEPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ONEPOINT.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ALLDIGI.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLDIGI.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ALLDIGI.BO trades at ₹814.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ALLDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ALLDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ALLDIGI.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs ALLDIGI.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLDIGI.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ALLDIGI.NS trades at ₹832.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ALLDIGI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLDIGI.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ALLDIGI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ALLDIGI.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ONEGLOBAL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ONEGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ONEGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ONEGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ONEGLOBAL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs UDS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UDS.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while UDS.NS trades at ₹159.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas UDS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UDS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to UDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check UDS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs UDS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UDS.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while UDS.BO trades at ₹160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas UDS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UDS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to UDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check UDS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs KAPSTON.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KAPSTON.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while KAPSTON.NS trades at ₹341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KAPSTON.NS's P/E ratio is 38.65. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KAPSTON.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to KAPSTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check KAPSTON.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ASTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ASTAR.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ASTAR.BO trades at ₹629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ASTAR.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs BLUSPRING.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLUSPRING.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while BLUSPRING.NS trades at ₹64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BLUSPRING.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLUSPRING.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to BLUSPRING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check BLUSPRING.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs GKWLIMITED.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GKWLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while GKWLIMITED.NS trades at ₹1,539.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GKWLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 128.57. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GKWLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to GKWLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check GKWLIMITED.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs EXHICON.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EXHICON.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while EXHICON.BO trades at ₹531.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EXHICON.BO's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXHICON.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to EXHICON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check EXHICON.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs MADHUVEER.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MADHUVEER.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while MADHUVEER.BO trades at ₹215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MADHUVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 147.33. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MADHUVEER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to MADHUVEER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check MADHUVEER.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs REPRO.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, REPRO.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while REPRO.NS trades at ₹356.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas REPRO.NS's P/E ratio is -24.19. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REPRO.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to REPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check REPRO.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs REPRO.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, REPRO.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while REPRO.BO trades at ₹353.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas REPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -24.63. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REPRO.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to REPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check REPRO.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs VINSYS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VINSYS.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while VINSYS.NS trades at ₹323.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VINSYS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to VINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check VINSYS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs RADIANTCMS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RADIANTCMS.BO trades at ₹42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RADIANTCMS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RADIANTCMS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and RADIANTCMS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RADIANTCMS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs RADIANTCMS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RADIANTCMS.NS trades at ₹41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RADIANTCMS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RADIANTCMS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check RADIANTCMS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs CGRAPHICS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CGRAPHICS.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while CGRAPHICS.NS trades at ₹168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CGRAPHICS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGRAPHICS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to CGRAPHICS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check CGRAPHICS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ALPHALOGIC.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALPHALOGIC.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ALPHALOGIC.BO trades at ₹56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ALPHALOGIC.BO's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ALPHALOGIC.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs LIKHAMI.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LIKHAMI.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while LIKHAMI.BO trades at ₹352.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas LIKHAMI.BO's P/E ratio is 1676.19. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LIKHAMI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and LIKHAMI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIKHAMI.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs DUGLOBAL.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DUGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while DUGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DUGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 80.09. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DUGLOBAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to DUGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check DUGLOBAL.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs MAJESAUT.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAJESAUT.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while MAJESAUT.BO trades at ₹315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MAJESAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MAJESAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to MAJESAUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check MAJESAUT.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs DJML.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DJML.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while DJML.BO trades at ₹92.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DJML.BO's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DJML.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to DJML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check DJML.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs EFACTOR.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EFACTOR.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while EFACTOR.NS trades at ₹239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EFACTOR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EFACTOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to EFACTOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check EFACTOR.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs DJML.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DJML.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while DJML.NS trades at ₹91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DJML.NS's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DJML.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to DJML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check DJML.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ARIHANTACA.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ARIHANTACA.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ARIHANTACA.NS trades at ₹470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ARIHANTACA.NS's P/E ratio is 47.72. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARIHANTACA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and ARIHANTACA.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARIHANTACA.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs DYNAMIC.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DYNAMIC.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while DYNAMIC.NS trades at ₹119.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DYNAMIC.NS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DYNAMIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check DYNAMIC.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs COMFINTE.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COMFINTE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while COMFINTE.BO trades at ₹7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas COMFINTE.BO's P/E ratio is -68.36. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COMFINTE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to COMFINTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check COMFINTE.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs INFOLLION.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INFOLLION.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while INFOLLION.NS trades at ₹243.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas INFOLLION.NS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFOLLION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and INFOLLION.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INFOLLION.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs RUCHINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RUCHINFRA.BO trades at ₹6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RUCHINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RUCHINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check RUCHINFRA.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs RUCHINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RUCHINFRA.NS trades at ₹6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RUCHINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RUCHINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check RUCHINFRA.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs KANDARP.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KANDARP.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while KANDARP.NS trades at ₹148.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KANDARP.NS's P/E ratio is 83.57. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KANDARP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to KANDARP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check KANDARP.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs KHFM.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KHFM.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while KHFM.NS trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KHFM.NS's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KHFM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and KHFM.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KHFM.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ISTRNETWK.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ISTRNETWK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ISTRNETWK.BO trades at ₹50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ISTRNETWK.BO's P/E ratio is 80.71. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISTRNETWK.BO's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ISTRNETWK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ISTRNETWK.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs TECHKGREEN.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TECHKGREEN.BO has a market cap of 922.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while TECHKGREEN.BO trades at ₹124.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TECHKGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TECHKGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to TECHKGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check TECHKGREEN.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs HARIGOV.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HARIGOV.BO has a market cap of 892.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while HARIGOV.BO trades at ₹178.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HARIGOV.BO's P/E ratio is -1487.92. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HARIGOV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and HARIGOV.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HARIGOV.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SUPRAPFSL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUPRAPFSL.BO has a market cap of 814.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SUPRAPFSL.BO trades at ₹23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SUPRAPFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SUPRAPFSL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs RIDDHICORP.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RIDDHICORP.BO has a market cap of 764.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RIDDHICORP.BO trades at ₹64.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RIDDHICORP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RIDDHICORP.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to RIDDHICORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check RIDDHICORP.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs CHOKSILA.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CHOKSILA.BO has a market cap of 740.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while CHOKSILA.BO trades at ₹106.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CHOKSILA.BO's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHOKSILA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to CHOKSILA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check CHOKSILA.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs VIVIDM.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VIVIDM.BO has a market cap of 722.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while VIVIDM.BO trades at ₹7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VIVIDM.BO's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VIVIDM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to VIVIDM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check VIVIDM.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs TRESCON.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRESCON.BO has a market cap of 702.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while TRESCON.BO trades at ₹9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TRESCON.BO's P/E ratio is 56.29. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRESCON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to TRESCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check TRESCON.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SERVICE.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SERVICE.NS has a market cap of 626.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SERVICE.NS trades at ₹54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SERVICE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SERVICE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SERVICE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SERVICE.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs SHARIKA.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHARIKA.BO has a market cap of 564.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SHARIKA.BO trades at ₹13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SHARIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -52.16. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHARIKA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SHARIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SHARIKA.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs HILIKS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HILIKS.BO has a market cap of 526.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while HILIKS.BO trades at ₹48.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HILIKS.BO's P/E ratio is 326.27. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HILIKS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to HILIKS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check HILIKS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs PROMAX.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PROMAX.BO has a market cap of 517M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PROMAX.BO trades at ₹20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PROMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PROMAX.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to PROMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check PROMAX.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs BLUEPEBBLE.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLUEPEBBLE.NS has a market cap of 514.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while BLUEPEBBLE.NS trades at ₹126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BLUEPEBBLE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLUEPEBBLE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to BLUEPEBBLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check BLUEPEBBLE.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs VERTEXPLUS.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VERTEXPLUS.NS has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while VERTEXPLUS.NS trades at ₹93.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VERTEXPLUS.NS's P/E ratio is 58.41. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VERTEXPLUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to VERTEXPLUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check VERTEXPLUS.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs ACCELERATE.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACCELERATE.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ACCELERATE.BO trades at ₹140.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ACCELERATE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACCELERATE.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and ACCELERATE.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACCELERATE.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs RITHWIKFMS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RITHWIKFMS.BO has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RITHWIKFMS.BO trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RITHWIKFMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and RITHWIKFMS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RITHWIKFMS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs HRHNEXT.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HRHNEXT.NS has a market cap of 417.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while HRHNEXT.NS trades at ₹31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HRHNEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HRHNEXT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to HRHNEXT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check HRHNEXT.NS's competition here
531216.BO vs VKAL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VKAL.BO has a market cap of 413.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while VKAL.BO trades at ₹1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VKAL.BO's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VKAL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and VKAL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VKAL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs FUTSOL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FUTSOL.BO has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while FUTSOL.BO trades at ₹39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas FUTSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FUTSOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to FUTSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check FUTSOL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SUGALDAM.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUGALDAM.BO has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SUGALDAM.BO trades at ₹64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SUGALDAM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUGALDAM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SUGALDAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SUGALDAM.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs JTAPARIA.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JTAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while JTAPARIA.BO trades at ₹23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas JTAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JTAPARIA.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to JTAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check JTAPARIA.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs WALCHPF.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WALCHPF.BO has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while WALCHPF.BO trades at ₹108.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas WALCHPF.BO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WALCHPF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to WALCHPF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check WALCHPF.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs MADHUSE.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MADHUSE.BO has a market cap of 294.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while MADHUSE.BO trades at ₹19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MADHUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MADHUSE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to MADHUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check MADHUSE.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs PRISMX.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRISMX.BO has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PRISMX.BO trades at ₹0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PRISMX.BO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRISMX.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to PRISMX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check PRISMX.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs KACL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KACL.BO has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while KACL.BO trades at ₹5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KACL.BO's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KACL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to KACL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check KACL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs LIBORDFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LIBORDFIN.BO has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while LIBORDFIN.BO trades at ₹17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas LIBORDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.69. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LIBORDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to LIBORDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check LIBORDFIN.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SMARTFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SMARTFIN.BO has a market cap of 269.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SMARTFIN.BO trades at ₹8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SMARTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMARTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SMARTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SMARTFIN.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs MPILCORPL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MPILCORPL.BO has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while MPILCORPL.BO trades at ₹467.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MPILCORPL.BO's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MPILCORPL.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to MPILCORPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check MPILCORPL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs INLANPR.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INLANPR.BO has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while INLANPR.BO trades at ₹53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas INLANPR.BO's P/E ratio is -72.47. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INLANPR.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to INLANPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check INLANPR.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs KAARYAFSL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KAARYAFSL.BO has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while KAARYAFSL.BO trades at ₹26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KAARYAFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KAARYAFSL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and KAARYAFSL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAARYAFSL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs DECOMIC.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DECOMIC.BO has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while DECOMIC.BO trades at ₹59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DECOMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DECOMIC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to DECOMIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check DECOMIC.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs ESHAMEDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ESHAMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ESHAMEDIA.BO trades at ₹31.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ESHAMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -13.84. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and ESHAMEDIA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESHAMEDIA.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs UNICK.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UNICK.BO has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while UNICK.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas UNICK.BO's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNICK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to UNICK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check UNICK.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs PREMCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PREMCAP.BO has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PREMCAP.BO trades at ₹5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PREMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -287.50. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PREMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to PREMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check PREMCAP.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SVS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SVS.BO has a market cap of 202.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SVS.BO trades at ₹9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SVS.BO's P/E ratio is 190.00. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SVS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SVS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs MNPLFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MNPLFIN.BO has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while MNPLFIN.BO trades at ₹23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MNPLFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 94.92. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MNPLFIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and MNPLFIN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNPLFIN.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SBECSYS.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SBECSYS.BO has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SBECSYS.BO trades at ₹17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SBECSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SBECSYS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SBECSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SBECSYS.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs ICSL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ICSL.BO has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ICSL.BO trades at ₹4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ICSL.BO's P/E ratio is 243.50. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICSL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ICSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ICSL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs PADAMCO.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PADAMCO.BO has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PADAMCO.BO trades at ₹1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PADAMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PADAMCO.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and PADAMCO.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PADAMCO.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs INNOKAIZ.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INNOKAIZ.BO has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while INNOKAIZ.BO trades at ₹15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas INNOKAIZ.BO's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INNOKAIZ.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and INNOKAIZ.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INNOKAIZ.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs PROCLB.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PROCLB.BO has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while PROCLB.BO trades at ₹31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PROCLB.BO's P/E ratio is -29.73. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PROCLB.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to PROCLB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check PROCLB.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs GLCL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLCL.BO has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while GLCL.BO trades at ₹24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GLCL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to GLCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check GLCL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs RAJSPTR.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RAJSPTR.BO has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while RAJSPTR.BO trades at ₹8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RAJSPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAJSPTR.BO's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and RAJSPTR.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAJSPTR.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SUJALA.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUJALA.BO has a market cap of 133.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SUJALA.BO trades at ₹23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SUJALA.BO's P/E ratio is 72.84. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUJALA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to SUJALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check SUJALA.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs KIRANPR.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KIRANPR.BO has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while KIRANPR.BO trades at ₹26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KIRANPR.BO's P/E ratio is 145.83. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KIRANPR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and KIRANPR.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIRANPR.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs AMALGAM.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMALGAM.BO has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while AMALGAM.BO trades at ₹47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AMALGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -36.77. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMALGAM.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to AMALGAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check AMALGAM.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs VISVEN.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VISVEN.BO has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while VISVEN.BO trades at ₹40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VISVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VISVEN.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to VISVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check VISVEN.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs ASIAN.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ASIAN.BO has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while ASIAN.BO trades at ₹36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ASIAN.BO's P/E ratio is 165.41. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASIAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to ASIAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check ASIAN.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs SHANGAR.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHANGAR.BO has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while SHANGAR.BO trades at ₹0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SHANGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHANGAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO and SHANGAR.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHANGAR.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs GGPL.BO Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GGPL.BO has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while GGPL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GGPL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GGPL.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to GGPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check GGPL.BO's competition here
531216.BO vs WINNY.NS Comparison April 2026
531216.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 531216.BO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WINNY.NS has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 531216.BO is priced at ₹12.36, while WINNY.NS trades at ₹49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
531216.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas WINNY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, 531216.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WINNY.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 531216.BO is less volatile compared to WINNY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 531216.BO.Check WINNY.NS's competition here